Implementation Workgroup, Starter Kits – Mar 8, 2010

Implementation Workgroup – Mar 8, 2010
Implementation Starter Kits
HIT Standards Committee
Monday, March 8, 2010
9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. [Eastern]
Washington, DC

Note from Meeting site: “A blog on “Implementation Starter Kits” is available on the FACA blog for you to tell us about the opportunties and challenges you faced in adopting health IT. Any information you can give us will be helpful for this public meeting.”

A G E N D A (pdf version)
9:00 a.m. Call to Order/Roll Call – Judy Sparrow, ONC
9:05 a.m. Welcome and Introduction
Aneesh Chopra, Chair, Implementation Workgroup
“Implementation Starter Kit: Lessons & Resources to Accelerate Adoption”
9:15 a.m. Public Sector Panel
Moderator: Aneesh Chopra, HIT Standards Committee member
–Doug Fridsma, NHIN, Office of the National Coordinator, HHS
–Hunt Blair, Deputy Director, Health Care Reform, Office of Vermont Health Access
–Jessica Kahn, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS
–Kim Davis-Allen, Alabama Medicaid
–Ken Buetow, National Cancer Institute, HHS
–Kathleen M. Roberts, National Institute of Standards and Technology
10:30 a.m. Implementation Experiences Panel
Moderator: Liz Johnson, HIT Standards Committee member
–David Muntz, Baylor
–Jay Colfer, Eclipsys (Baylor vendor)
–Charles Christian, Good Samaritan
–Michelle Freed, McKesson (Good Samaritan)
–Mitzi Cardenas, Truman Medical
–Mike Valentine, Cerner (Truman Medical)
–Michael Sauk, University of Wisconsin
–Sumit Rana, Epic (University of Wisconsin)
12:00 p.m. LUNCH BREAK
1:00 p.m. Implementation Experiences Panel, con’t
Moderator: Judy Murphy, HIT Standards Committee member
–Amanda Parsons, New York City Primary Care Information Project (NYC PCIP)
–Sidd Shah, eClinical Works (NYC PCIP)
–Dick Thompson, Quality Health Network
–Ray Scott, Axolotl (Quality Health Network)
–John Blair, Taconic, IPA
–Jennifer Brull, Solo Family Physician, Plainville, KS
–Maria Rudolph, eMDs (Dr. Brull’s vendor)
2:15 p.m. Innovation Panel
Moderator: Cris Ross, HIT Standards Committee member
–David Stuart Buck, Healthcare for the Homeless – Houston & Baylor College of Medicine
–Harry Totonis or David Yakimischak, SureScripts
–Tom Morrison, NaviNet
–Sherry Reynolds, Group Health
–Will Ross, Redwood MedNet
3:30 p.m. Meeting Summary – Aneesh Chopra, Chair
3:45 p.m. Public Comment
4:00 p.m. Adjourn

How to Participate Remotely
Webconference: Go to link at least 10 minutes prior to meeting; test system prior to meeting.
Audio: You may listen in via computer or telephone.
US toll free:   1-877-705-2976
International Direct:  1-201-689-8798

Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA: Special Asst to Blumenthal

Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA
Special Assistant to the National Coordinator  for Health IT

Name, role and bio added to ONC site by March 5, 2010:

Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA

Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA

“Sachin H. Jain is special assistant to the National Coordinator for HealthInformation Technology in the Obama Administration.  In this role, he works closely with Dr. Blumenthal in executing his health IT agenda.  Prior to joining the administration, he was a member of the faculty at Harvard Business School and a resident physician in internal medicine at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. 

“Dr. Jain holds his bachelor’s degree (AB), his medical degree (MD), and MBA from Harvard University.  A Paul and Daisy Soros Fellow, Dr. Jain has worked previously at McKinsey and Co, WellPoint, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement.  Dr. Jain was principal investigator on three Commonwealth Fund grants used to found and support ImproveHealthCare.org, an organization that aims to educate physicians about health care systems.  He has served as a guest instructor at the MIT-Sloan School of Management, and the Darden School at the University of Virginia. He has served as a reviewer for JAMA and the European Management Journal.  

“While he was faculty at the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness at Harvard Business School, Dr. Jain worked closely with strategy professor Michael Porter on case studies on innovative health care delivery models.  Dr. Jain was a founding member and associate director of the Global Health Delivery Project housed at the Institute and Harvard Medical School.  He consulted for a variety of companies across the health care sector, including several small health information technology companies.

“Dr. Jain’s writings have appeared in The New England Journal of Medicine, The Boston Globe, Healthcare Financial Management, American Journal of Managed Care, Modern Healthcare, and the Harvard Health Policy Review.  The book he co-edited (with Susan Pories and Gordon Harper) The Soul of A Doctor (Algonquin Press: Chapel Hill) was published in 2006 and has been translated into Chinese (2008).  

“A native of Bergen County, NJ, Dr. Jain now resides in Washington, DC.”

Health IT Policy Committee Meeting: Feb 17, 2010

HIT Policy Committee Meeting: February 17, 2010
Recommendations on CMS and ONC Rules
Agenda, Documents, How to Participate Remotely

Health IT Policy Committee meeting on Feb 17, 2010 focuses on recommendations to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on the Notice for Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) about EHR incentives and to Office of National Coordinator for Health IT on the Interim Final Rule (IFR) on Certification Criteria.
Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m./Eastern
Location:  Washington, DC

Agenda [PDF - 393 KB]
10:00 a.m.
CALL TO ORDER – Judy Sparrow, ONC for Health IT
10:05 a.m. Opening Remarks – David Blumenthal, MD, MPP, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
10:15 a.m. Review of the Agenda – Paul Tang, Vice Chair of the Committee
10:20 a.m. Meaningful Use Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
- Paul Tang, Chair
- George Hripcsak, Co-Chair
11:30 a.m. Adoption/Certification Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the NPRM and the Interim Final Rule (IFR) on Certification Criteria
- Paul Egerman, Co-Chair
- Marc Probst, Co-Chair
12:00 p.m. LUNCH BREAK
12:45 p.m. Information Exchange Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on Health Information Exchange in the NPRM
- Deven McGraw, Chair
- Micky Tripathi, Co-Chair
1:30 p.m. Privacy & Security Policy Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the Privacy & Security Objective in the NPRM
- Deven McGraw, Chair
- Rachel Block, Co-Chair
2:30 p.m. NHIN Workgroup Recommendations
- David Lansky, Chair, NHIN Workgroup
- Daniel Weitzner, Co-Chair, NHIN Workgroup
- Farzad Mostashari, Office of the National Coordinator
3:15 p.m. Update: Strategic Plan Workgroup
- Paul Tang, Chair, Strategic Plan Workgroup
- Jodi Daniel, Co-Chair
3:45 p.m. Public Comment
4:00 p.m. Adjourn

Documents
Meaningful Use Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the NPRM [PPT - 1.22 MB]
NPRM Recommendations [PDF - 488 KB]
Adoption/Certification Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the NPRM and IFR on Certification Criteria [PPT - 1.15 MB]
Information Exchange Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on Health Information Exchange in the NPRM [PPT - 229 KB]
Privacy & Security Policy Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the Privacy & Security Objective in the NPRM [PPT - 216 KB]
NHIN Workgroup Recommendations [PPT - 1.14 MB]

How to Participate Remotely
Webconference: Go to link at least 10 minutes prior to meeting; test system prior to meeting.
Audio: You may listen in via computer or telephone.
US toll free:   1-877-705-6006
International Direct:  1-201-689-8557
Confirmation Code: HIT Committee Meeting

Chopra Invites Feedback on Opportunities, Challenges facing HIT Implementation: FACA Blog

Aneesh Chopra Invites You to Tell Us About Opportunities and Challenges facing HIT Implementation: Federal Advisory Committee Blog
On Feb 12, 2010 post on FACA Blog, US CTO and Implementation Workgroup Chair Aneesh Chopra invited feedback and HIT success stories in preparation for ”March 8th, the Implementation Workgroup of the Health IT Standards Committee (which) will hold a public hearing on ‘Implementation Starter Kit: Lessons and Resources to Accelerate Adoption’ to help providers achieve meaningful use by, in part, surfacing examples of effective meaningful use implementation preparation.”

Chopra continues “Although any comment or question is welcome, we are particularly interested in questions or comments about the four categories of standards:

  1. Vocabulary Standards (i.e., standardized nomenclatures and code sets used to describe clinical problems and procedures, medications, labs and allergies);
  2. Content Exchange Standards (i.e., standards used to share clinical information such as clinical summaries, prescriptions, and structured electronic documents);
  3. Transport Standards (i.e., standards used to establish a common, predictable, secure communication protocol between systems); and
  4. Privacy and Security Standards (e.g., authentication, access control, transmission security) which relate to and span across all of the other types of standards. “

While feedback on the blog is “not a substitute for official feedback on the regulations” due March 15, 2010, it will help guide the Implementation meeting.

CMS & ONC Issue Meaningful Use Definition and EHR Standards for Incentives

CMS and ONC Issue Regulations Proposing a Definition of ‘Meaningful Use’ and Setting Standards for Electronic Health Record Incentive Program
Press Release Distributed via eMail
DATE: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 
FOR RELEASE: Immediately                 

Public Encouraged to Comment on New Regulations:
60-Day Comment Period

“The Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) encourage public comment on two regulations issued today that lay a foundation for improving quality, efficiency and safety through meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technology. The regulations will help implement the EHR incentive programs enacted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act).

“A proposed rule issued by CMS outlines proposed provisions governing the EHR incentive programs, including defining the central concept of ‘meaningful use’ of EHR technology. An interim final regulation (IFR) issued by ONC sets initial standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for EHR technology.  Both regulations are open to public comment.

“‘Widespread adoption of electronic health records holds great promise for improving health care quality, efficiency, and patient safety,’ said, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.  ‘The Recovery Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help providers adopt and make meaningful use of EHR technology so they can give better care and their patients’ experience of care will improve. Over time, we believe the EHR incentive program under Medicare and Medicaid will accelerate and facilitate health information technology adoption by more individual providers and organizations throughout the health care system.’

“‘These regulations are closely linked,’ said Charlene Frizzera, CMS acting administrator.  ‘CMS’s proposed regulation would define and specify how to demonstrate ‘meaningful use’ of EHR technology, which is a prerequisite for receiving the Medicare incentive payments.  Our rule also outlines the proposed payment methodologies for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs.  ONC’s regulation sets forth the standards and specifications that will enhance the interoperability, functionality, utility and security of health information technology.’

“CMS and ONC worked closely to develop the two rules and received input from hundreds of technical subject matters experts, health care providers, and other key stakeholders.  Numerous public meetings to solicit public comment were held by three Federal advisory committees: the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), the Health IT Policy Committee (HITPC), and the Health IT Standards Committee (HITSC).  HITSC presented its final recommendations to the National Coordinator in August 2009.  These recommendations, along with all other input were considered to help inform the development of the regulations announced today.

“The IFR issued by ONC describes the standards that must be met by certified EHR technology to exchange healthcare information among providers and between providers and patients. This initial set of standards begins to define a common language to ensure accurate and secure health information exchange across different EHR systems.  The IFR describes standard formats for clinical summaries and prescriptions; standard terms to describe clinical problems, procedures, laboratory tests, medications and allergies; and standards for the secure transportation of this information using the Internet.

“The IFR calls for the industry to standardize the way in which EHR information is exchanged between organizations, and sets forth criteria required for an EHR technology to be certified. These standards will support meaningful use and data exchange among providers who must use certified EHR technology to qualify for the Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

“Under the statute, HHS is required to adopt an initial set of standards for EHR technology by Dec. 31, 2009.  The IFR will go into effect 30 days after publication, with an opportunity for public comment and refinement over the next 60 days.  A final rule will be issued in 2010.

“‘We strongly encourage stakeholders to provide comments on these standards and specifications,’ Dr. Blumenthal said.

“The Recovery Act established programs to provide incentive payments to eligible professionals and eligible hospitals participating in Medicare and Medicaid that adopt and make “meaningful use” of certified EHR technology.  Incentive payments may begin as soon as October 2010 to eligible hospitals.  Incentive payments to other eligible providers may begin in January 2011.

“The proposed rule would define the term ‘meaningful EHR user’ as an eligible professional or eligible hospital that, during the specified reporting period, demonstrates meaningful use of certified EHR technology in a form and manner consistent with certain objectives and measures presented in the regulation.  These objectives and measures would include use of certified EHR technology in a manner that improves quality, safety, and efficiency of health care delivery, reduces health care disparities, engages patients and families, improves care coordination, improves population and public health, and ensures adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information. 

“The proposed rule would define meaningful use for the Medicare EHR incentive programs.  It proposes one definition that would apply to eligible professionals participating in the Medicare fee-for-service and the Medicare Advantage EHR incentive programs as well as a proposed definition that would apply to eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals.  These definitions also would serve as the minimum standard for eligible professionals and eligible hospitals participating in the Medicaid EHR incentive program.  The rule proposes that states could request CMS approval to implement additional meaningful use measures, as appropriate, but could not request approval of fewer or less rigorous meaningful use measures than required by the rule.

“This rule proposes a phased approach to implement the proposed requirements for demonstrating meaningful use.  This approach would initially establish reasonable criteria for meaningful use based on currently available technological capabilities and providers’ practice experience.  CMS will establish stricter and more extensive criteria for demonstrating meaningful use over time, as anticipated developments in technology and providers’ capabilities occur.

“CMS provides a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule.  ‘The definition and requirements for demonstrating meaningful use of EHR technology are proposals. CMS welcomes and will give serious consideration to comments that improve our proposal while achieving the goals Congress established for the EHR incentive programs,’ Frizzera said.

“The CMS proposed rule and fact sheets, may be viewed at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Recovery/11_HealthIT.asp

“ONC’s interim final rule may be viewed at http://healthit.hhs.gov/standardsandcertification. In early 2010 ONC intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking related to the certification of health information technology.”
# # #

Additional excerpts from ONC and CMS Web sites:
CMS Proposed Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program (pdf) 

ONC Interim Final Rule: Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology (pdf)

Facts At A Glance: Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology

Standards & Certification Interim Final Rule: 
Frequently Asked Questions
Please note:
Questions are organized by category. These pages are updated frequently, so please check back with the ONC site often.

Question Categories:
A. Background/General
B. Timeframe & Comments
C. Standards & Certification Criteria
D. Related Rules

Related CMS Links
Press Release: CMS and ONC Issue Regulations Proposing A Definition Of “Meaningful Use” and Setting Standards for Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

Fact Sheet: Proposed Requirements for EHR Medicaid Incentive Program

Fact Sheet: Proposed Requirements for EHR Medicare Incentive Program

Sheet: Proposed Definition of Meaningful Use

Health IT Frequently Asked Questions

Blumenthal’s Updates — Dec 30, 2009
For Nat’l Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal’s Letter #8 to Public and Link to his Health IT Buzz post “A Defining Moment for Meaningful Use,” see e-Healthcare Marketing post.

Reporting on Information Releases from ONC and CMS
See HISTalk blog’s Dec 30, 2009 post “ONCHIT Releases Preliminary Definition of Meaningful Use” for summary of proposed and interim rules.
Mary Mosquera’s Dec 30, 2009 story in Government HealthIT, carried my favorite headline “The wait is over: HHS unveil’s ‘meaningful use’ plan” as well as a comprehensive summary while avoiding a detailed rundown.
Healthcare IT News delivered two articles on Dec 30, 2009:
          Bernie Moengain wrote: “CMS, ONC deliver meaningful use package”
          Jack Beaudoin wrote: Eligible Provider “Meaningful Use: Criteria”
Joseph Goedert reported a brief summary Dec 30, 2009 in HealthData Management called “Feds Issue Meaningful Use, Certification Rules.”

HITECH Funding Opportunities from ONC

HITECH Funding Opportunities from ONC
These are the eight funding programs from the Office of National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT. Excerpted from ONC Web site on Dec 22, 2009. Links for upcoming technical assistance calls or slides and transcripts where available.

Currently Available Funding Opportunities
Health Information Technology Extension Program (cycle 2)
Objective: This program provides grants for the establishment of Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers that will offer technical assistance, guidance and information on best practices to support and accelerate health care providers’ efforts to become meaningful users of Electronic Health Records (EHRs).
Application Deadline: 
Cycle 1: Full Applications – November 3, 2009
Cycle 2: Preliminary Applications – December 22, 2009; Full Applications – January 29, 2010 

Curriculum Development Centers
Objective: 
This funding opportunity, one component of the Health IT Workforce Program, will provide $10 million in grants to institutions of higher education (or consortia thereof) to support health information technology (health IT) curriculum development.
Application Deadline:  January 14, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 4, 2010)
See slides and transcript from Dec 17, 2009 technical assistance call.

Community College Consortia to Educate Health Information Technology Professionals
Objective:
This program, one component of the Health IT Workforce Program, seeks to rapidly create health IT education and training programs at Community Colleges or expand existing programs.  Community Colleges funded under this initiative will establish intensive, non-degree training programs that can be completed in six months or less.
Application Deadline:  January 22, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 6, 2010)
Slides and Transcript from Technical Assistance Call Dec 16, 2009.

Program of Assistance for University-Based Training
Objective:  The purpose of this program, one component of the Health IT Workforce Program, is to rapidly increase the availability of individuals qualified to serve in specific health information technology professional roles requiring university-level training.  
Application Deadline:  January 25, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 6, 2010)
Technical Assistance call on Dec 23, 2009 at 2:00 pm and Jan 5, 2009 at 3:00 pm EST plus Slides from Dec 23 call.

Competency Examination for Individuals Completing Non-Degree Training
Objective:
  This funding opportunity, one component of the Health IT Workforce Program, will provide $6 million in grants to an institution of higher education (or consortia thereof) to support the development and initial administration of a set of health IT competency examinations.
Application Deadline:  January 25, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 8, 2010)
Technical Assistance Call on Jan 6, 2010 at 1:00pm EST. Details to come.

Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Program
Objective:  The purpose of these awards is to fund research focused on achieving breakthrough advances to address well-documented problems that have impeded adoption: 1) Security of Health Information Technology; 2) Patient-Centered Cognitive Support; 3) Healthcare Application and Network Platform Architectures; and, 4) Secondary Use of EHR Data.
Application Deadline:  January 25, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 4, 2010)
Technical Assistance Call: Dec 22, 2009, and Jan 4, 2010 at 2:30 pm plus Slides from Dec 22 call.

Beacon Community Cooperative Agreement Program
Objective:
  This program will provide funding to communities to build and strengthen their health information technology (health IT) infrastructure and exchange capabilities to demonstrate the vision of meaningful health IT.
Application Deadline:  February 1, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 8, 2010)
Slides and Transcript from Technical Assistance Call Dec 14, 2009.
 
Closed Funding Opportunities (Pending Award)
State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program
These grant programs will support states and/or State Designated Entities (SDEs) in establishing health information exchange (HIE) capacity among health care providers and hospitals in their jurisdictions. Such efforts at the state level will establish and implement appropriate governance, policies, and network services within the broader national framework to rapidly build capacity for connectivity between and among health care providers. State programs to promote HIE will help to realize the full potential of EHRs to improve the coordination, efficiency, and quality of care.
Awards expected in early 2010.

JAMIA: Characteristics associated with RHIO viability

JAMIA: Characteristics associated with Regional Health Information Organization viability
In January 2010 issue of JAMIA,  the original research paper titled “Characteristics associated with Regional Health Information Organization viability” by Julia Adler-Milstein, John Landefeld, and Ashish K Jha concludes “Our work suggests that RHIOs find a broad group of stakeholders and begin with a narrow set of activities to help them get off the ground. Further, we believe that judicious use of grants, possibly through ‘matching’ mechanisms where stakeholders are also asked to contribute early, will help to ensure that RHIOs become viable and self-sustaining.”

As Joseph Goedert reported Dec 17, 2009 in HealthData Management article titled “What Makes HIEs Viable?” “Results from a national survey of regional health information organizations show simplicity and early funding commitments from participants improve viability of the initiatives.”

A December 2007 study in Health Affairs by two of the same Harvard authors examining “The State Of Regional Health Information Organizations: Current Activities And Financing” found “a substantial number of early failures, stalled efforts, and RHIOs that were heavily dependent on grants.”

ONC Releases Two More HIT Workforce Training Programs: Dec 17, 2009

ONC Releases Two More HIT Workforce Training Programs: Dec 17, 2009
University-based Training and
Competency Exams for Non-degree Training

Two new workforce training programs were posted on ONC site on Dec 17, 2009, though not yet “officially” announced. National Coordinator for Health IT Dr. David Blumenthal has been dropping hints in the past few days about additional funding programs to be announced shortly. So here are two new programs.

Program of Assistance for University-Based Training
Objective:  The purpose of this program is to rapidly increase the availability of individuals qualified to serve in specific health information technology professional roles requiring university-level training.  
Application Deadline:  January 25, 2010

Competency Examination for Individuals Completing Non-Degree Training
Objective:  This funding opportunity, one component of the workforce program, will provide $6 million in grants to an institution of higher education (or consortia thereof) to support the development and initial administration of a set of health IT competency examinations.
Application Deadline:  January 25, 2010 (Letter of Intent due January 8, 2010)

Additional info excerpted from ONC HITECH Funding pages:
Program of Assistance for University-Based Training
“The purpose of the Information Technology Professionals in Health Care: Program of Assistance for University-Based Training grants is to rapidly increase the availability of individuals qualified to serve in specific health information technology professional roles requiring university-level training.  Four-year colleges or universities are eligible to apply for funding under this program, which will emphasize programs that can be completed by the trainee in one year or less.  Awardees will be expected to promptly establish, fill, and begin graduating students from new training positions as rapidly as is feasible without compromising the adequacy of training such graduates will have received.”

“The six roles targeted by this funding opportunity are:

  1. Clinician/Public Health Leader
  2. Health Information Management and Exchange Specialist
  3. Health Information Privacy and Security Specialist
  4. Research and Development Scientist
  5. Programmers and Software Engineer
  6. Health IT Sub-specialist “

Learn more about the Program of Assistance for University-Based Training:

Competency Examination Program
“The Competency Examination for Individuals Completing Non-Degree Training program, one component of the workforce program, will provide $6 million in grants to an institution of higher education (or consortia thereof) to support the development and initial administration of a set of health IT competency examinations.  The examinations will assess basic competency for individuals trained through short-duration, non-degree health IT programs, and for members of the workforce with relevant experience or other types of training who are seeking to demonstrate their competency in certain health IT workforce roles integral to achieving meaningful use of electronic health information.”

Learn more about the Competency Examination Program:

‘Beacon’ communities must show HIT bona fides

‘Beacon’ communities must show HIT bona fides
Mary Mosquera reported in Government Health IT on Dec 14, 2009,
“To become a ‘beacon’ community, applicants must have an established track record of using health IT to improve health care in at least one category — cost efficiency, quality of care or population health, said Dr. Farzad Mostashari, senior advisor to the Office of the National Coordinator for health IT during a Dec. 14 teleconference.”

Beacon Communities Technical Call Documents from ONC site
Slides
Transcript

For overview of program and links to Announcment and FAQs, see this post on e-Healthcare Marketing.
Dr. Blumenthal’s Update #5 “Beacon Communities: Shining a Light on the Real Impacts of Health IT” is also posted on e-Healthcare Marketing.

Medscape One-on-One: Rapidly Unfolding Health Information Technology

Medscape One-on-One: Rapidly Unfolding Health IT
Video Interview with Ashish Jha, Health Policy Expert
On December 2, 2009, Medscape inaugurated a new One-on-One video Interview series, starting with its first guest Ashish Jha,
a physician-scientist with the Harvard School of Public Health, whose paper in the New England Journal of Medicine earlier in 2009 pointed out the low rate of EHR implementation in the country. Jha discusses the article and the implications of the HITECH act. (Interview may require registration.)

NEJM, April 16, 2009: “Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals.” Written by Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPH, et. al. (Et. al. includes ONC Director David Blumenthal.) This article is available to public for free.