ONC Updates FAQs on Regional Extension Centers: Oct 1, 2009

ONC Updates FAQs on Regional Extension Centers
Frequently Asked Questions Updated as of October 1, 2009
The Funding and Application Submissions FAQs were updated on October 1, 2009. ONC encourages users to check its site frequently for updates.
Main Regional Extension Center FAQ page 
      A. BACKGROUND/GENERAL FAQs
      B. FUNDING FAQs (updated Oct 1, 2009)
      C. ELIGIBILITY FAQs
      D. APPLICATION SUBMISSION FAQs (updated Oct 1, 2009)
      E. APPLICATION REVIEW FAQs
     
F. AWARD ADMINISTRATION FAQs
      G. OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS FAQs

The Funding FAQs reiterate that for the purposes of this grant,  “10 individual priority primary-care providers” is the maximum number that will be counted in a single incorporated physician practice. A Center will only receive financial support once for a provider no matter how many locations that physician serves. Providers will be identified by a National Provider Identifier (NPI).

For previous post about FAQs, see e-Healthcare Marketing.

Data in EMRs to be Health Industry’s Most Valuable Asset: PriceWaterhouseCoopers Study

EMR Data–Health Industry’s Most Valuable Asset: PwC Study
“Transforming healthcare through secondary use of health data”

In a report issued on October 1, 2009 by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 3/4 of healthcare executives surveyed “agree that the secondary use of this information (from electronic medical records) will be their organization’s greatest asset over the next five years. The data that could be mined from the health system can improve patient care, predict public health trends and reduce healthcare costs, but PricewaterhouseCoopers finds lack of standards, privacy concerns and technology limitations are holding back progress.”

“PricewaterhouseCoopers calls for public-private collaboration and a role for government in creating incentives for the private sector to collect, share and use health data; to establish standards; and to redefine technical architecture to allow interoperability.”

This report is based on a round-table discussion PwC held with IT and strategy leaders from payer, provider, and pharmaceutical companies, and  a related national survey conducted in the spring of 2009.

Five case studies for using secondary health data are highlighted:
1. Integrated, member focused healthcare: Aetna
2. Evidence-based, quality improvement program: American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA)
3. Promoting healthcare research: Geisinger Health System
4. Post-market surveillance of drugs: Partners HealthCare
5. An integrated health record: WellPoint

PwC Press Release
PwC Report Web Page
PwC Report (pdf) : “Transforming healthcare through secondary use of health data”

North Shore-LIJ (NY) Health System Investing $400M to Connect Up to 7,000 Physicians, 13 Hospitals with Electronic Health Records System

North Shore-LIJ (NY) Health System Investing $400M to Connect
Up to 7,000 Physicians, 13 Hospitals with Electronic Health Records System
Per North Shore-LIG and Allscripts September 28, 2009 Press Release: “The North Shore-LIJ Health System announced today it is subsidizing up to 85 percent of the cost of implementing and operating an Electronic Health Records (EHR) system in the offices of its more than 7,000 affiliated physicians in New York City and Long Island — part of a $400 million investment to strengthen the quality of care throughout the region by automating inpatient and outpatient records in all medical settings, including 13 hospitals. In implementing the largest EHR program in the New York metropolitan area and one of the largest in the nation, North Shore-LIJ will provide physicians with individual subsidies of up to $40,000 over five years.”

Michael J. Dowling, president and chief executive officer (CEO) of the North Shore-LIJ Health System said “We’re not going to measure our return-on-investment (ROI) in terms of dollars and cents; our ROI will be based on our ability to improve patient outcomes.”

“Glen Tullman, CEO of Allscripts, noted that providing physicians with real-time care guidelines via the EHR increases the probability of achieving fundamental improvements in the quality of patient care.”

John Bosco, North Shore-LIJ’s chief information officer said “the Allscripts’ EHR will connect to a separate inpatient clinical information system from Eclipsys Corporation that North Shore-LIJ is deploying at its hospitals and other facilities.”

Several accounts following this story in conjunction with Press Release:
Steve Lohr of New York Times broke the story previous day on September 27, 2009 reporting ”The nation’s drive toward computerized medical records is getting a push from big hospitals, which hope not only to improve patient care but to gain an edge on competitors.”
Ridgley Ochs of Newsday reported on September 28, 2009 “Dr. Paul Moulinie, a cardiologist in Huntington and Syosset, said he is excited – and nervous – that his practice will be one of the first to get rid of paper charts and go completely electronic.” Moulinie said that physicians could do a better job of patient care with immediate access to complete patient histories.
Claude Solnik of Long Island Business News reported September 28, 2009 that Dr. Robert Williams, director of Deloitte Healthcare Consulting said “No comparably-sized hospital system in the country is providing this level of financial assistance to so many physicians to integrate an electronic health record.”  Solnick also quoted Stanley Bergman, CEO of Melville, Long Island-based Henry Schein, one of several independent distributors of Allscripts’ system to physicians, but it appears that the North Shore deal is directly with Allscripts.

See previous e-Healthcare Marketing post on “Connecting All Your Docs at ‘Most Wired’ Hospitals.”

Physicians & Hospitals: To wait or not to wait for ‘Meaningful Use?’

‘MEANINGFUL USE’
Halamka Advises No Waiting for Physicians & Hospitals
John Halamka is knee-deep in the issues of Electronic Health Records from his CIO jobs and his national committee roles, and it’s worth paying close attention to what he says and blogs. In his September 21, 2009 post on his Life as  Healthcare CIO blog, Halamka clearly states “Meaningful Use is complete for 2011 and you’ll find the finished matrix online.” (See below.) Halamka then outlines the three stages coming in 2009, and concludes that you should buy a EHR or hosted solution with qualifications he futher outlines.

Final Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures 2011-2013-2015
Matrix–August 2009
(pdf)
from Health IT Policy Committee Recommendations to National Coordinator of Defining Meaningful Use

While ONC site labels above Augsut 2009 matrix as “final meaningful use objectives and measures” for three years, only the 2011 recommendations to the ONC are complete, and they are subject to additional approval process by ONC, HHS, and CMS. It’s likely that only inability of CMS to process some of the measures in a timely basis could impact implementation in 2011 or first year of implementation by physician or hospital. The Policy Committee still needs to finalize the 2013 and 2015 criteria in this matrix before they make a final recommendation for those years.

ONC Meaningful Use Overview
ONC Meaningful Use Documents Page

          Documents from ONC, CMS, HIT Policy and Standards Committees, and National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).

Digital Dilemma for Hospital Medicine

Digital Dilemma for Hospital Medicine Physicians
The September 2009 issue of The Hospitalist does an overview of the HITECH Stimulus act and what Hospitalists face in terms of implementing EHRs, not getting left behind, and facing privacy and communication obstacles.

Added note: What’s the dilemma? The boxed sidebar entitled “DON’T GET LEFT BEHIND” describes the dilemma, though the article and my brief summary above should have pointed this out. According to the Society of Hospital Medicine  ”The term ‘hospitalist’ refers to physicians whose practice emphasizes providing care for hospitalized patients.” Yet, as the sidebar points out that the hospitalist must get involved from the earliest stages, taking time away from their immediate focus of caring directly for patients, to work through what may seem tedious discussions and activities to make EHR adoption successful: attend meetings with hospital leaders and IT about adoption; speak up with your concerns; participate in design forums, testing, and feedback sessions; and plan ahead.

Hospital Medicine and Hospitalists
Web site for Society of Hospital Medicine:
http://www.hospitalmedicine.org
The Society for Hospital Medicine estimates that there are about 20,000 hospitalists in the country, with 30,000 expected by the end of the decade. In June 2009, the American Medical Association approved recommendations for 15 Prinicipals for Developing Sustainable and Successful Hospitalist Programs. While the AMA does not represent the majority of physicians, it does maintain a generally accepted database of all US physicians and its official specialty count for US Hospitalists was about 110 at the end of 2008. This specialty was added relatively recently to the AMA’s physician database.

Thanks to a LinkedIn member for noting that the original brief summary needed more value, and not just another click before the full text.

Connecting All Your Docs at ‘Most Wired’ Hospitals

Connecting All Your Docs at ‘Most Wired Hospitals’
Alden Solovoy reports in the September 2009 issue of American Hospitals Association’s
H&HN–Hospitals & Health Networks  The majority of the Most Wired (hospitals and hospital systems) do not distinguish between employed and independent physicians in their integration efforts, with 57 percent subsidizing both types of physician practices.” 93% of the 2009 Most Wired provide some EHR support to at least one category of practices. Story includes useful charts plus quotes from John Halamka, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, #1 Most Wired; Daniel Barchi,  Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, #7 of 100 Most Wired;  John Schrenker, Lakeside Health System, Brockport, NY, one of the 2009 Most Improved; and Jerry Peter, Lakeside Hospital System, Painesville, Ohio, one of the 2009 Most Improved.

H&HN Lists of Most Wired, Most Improved, Most Wired–Small and Rural, and Most Wireless. Published in July 2009.

See Sept 29 post on e-Healthcare Marketing about North Shore-LIJ subsidizing up to 7,000 physicians.

Blumenthal calls for more study on uses of HIT

AHRQ Conference:
Blumenthal calls for more study on uses of Health IT

Mary Mosquera of Government Health IT reported on September 14, 2009 from the Annual Conference of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), just outside Washington, DC, that National Coordinator for Health IT, David Blumenthal, “anticipates an enormous amount of research will be needed to determine the effectiveness of health information technology at the same time as it is widely deployed under the stimulus.” Blumenthal said that while research on EHR usage has been done in individual hospital and practice settings, a great deal of research will need to be conducted in many different settings across a large spectrum to ensure the most effective use of the technology.  AHRQ issues grants to conduct research in Health IT, and AHRQ Director Carolyn Clancy said new research would look into its impact.

AHRQ: Consumers don’t understand Health IT
Mary Mosquera of Government Health IT further reported September 14, 2009, on AHRQ research among consumer focus that “Although healthcare is a very important issue to most people, ‘the specific issue of health IT is not because they do not perceive a strong connection between health IT and healthcare quality.’” Focus group members were very concerned about privacy issues involving Health IT. Public education could help mitigate these concerns according to the report.

AHRQ Report: Report on Engaging Consumers in Health IT Development (pdf)

NY Times: Tech Companies Push to Digitize Patients’ Records

Tech Companies Push to Digitize Patients’ Records
In a major story fronting New York Times business section (Sept 10, 2009), Steve Lohr reports “On one proposal for health care reform at least, there is a rare bipartisan consensus: the push to computerize patient records.” Article starts with Dell’s new partnerships with hospital groups, gives a sampling of seven companies involved with EHR implementation in a sidebar,  looks at Verizon’s initiative to build supporting data centers, and captures the EHR experience of Dr. Allen Gee, a sole practioner in Cody, Wyoming.

ONC’s Questions for Regional Extension Centers

Regional Extension Centers
Required Content for Preliminary Application
First Wave: Due September 8, 2009 for ARRA 2009
Health Information Technology Extension Program:
Regional Centers Cooperative Agreement Program
Below is an excerpt;  please go to ONC’s HIT Extension Program: Regional Centers Cooperative Agreement Program site for complete information.

I.  Geographic Catchment Area
Proposed Catchment Area
Sub-State Region:
          Specify State(s) by 2-letter USPS abbreviation(s)*
          Specify Counties
Metropolitan Service Area:
          Specify MSA Name
          Specify Code
Proposed Number of Practices
          (providers) receiving direct technical assistance

Hospitals:
          # of hospitals, # of sites, # providers
Community Health Centers
          # CHC, # sites, # providers
Large practices (>10)
          # practices, # sites , # providers
Small practices (= or <10)
         # practices, # sites, # providers

Prior quality improvement/ practice redesign experience
Hospitals
          # hospitals,  # sites,  # providers
Community Health Centers
          #CHC, # sites, # providers
Small practices (= or <10)
          # practices, # sites,  # providers

VA Hospital(s) in catchment area?
          Yes (Specify #), No
Department of Defense Military Treatment Facility in catchment area?
          Yes (Specify #), No
Tribal health facility in catchment area?
          Yes (Specify #), No
Health information exchange capability in catchment area?
          Yes (Specify  name and operational stage for each), No

II. Proposed Service Offerings
Group purchasing of EHR software
          Yes, No
Onsite technical assistance
         Yes, No
Local workforce support
        Yes, No
Implementation-related project management
         Yes, No
Practice and workflow redesign
         Yes, No

III. Organizational Mission, Capability, Experience
Organizational Tax Status
501 (c) (3)
          Yes, No
Other (specify)

Annual Budget
          Budget $

Staffing (# FTE Staff in each category)
          Outreach/ communications _#_
          HIT implementation _#_
          Quality improvement_#_
          Other_#_
          Interfaces and information exchange _#_
          Hardware and network infrastructure _#_
          Quality improvement_#_

Prior EHR implementation experience (must include clinical documentation)
          # Different EHR Systems (Name)
          # Active EHR vendor contracts
          Hospitals
                    # hospitals, # sites,  # providers
          Community Health Centers
                    #CHC, # sites,  # providers
          Large practices (>10)
                    # practices, # sites, # providers
          Small practices (= or <10)
                    # practices, # sites, # providers

Prior quality improvement/practice redesign experience
          Hospitals
                    # hospitals, # sites,  # providers
          Community Health Centers
                    #CHC, # sites,  # providers
          Small practices (= or <10)
                    # practices, # sites, # providers

IV. Multi-Stakeholder Community and Provider Support
Health Plans          0, 1, 2+
Hospital Systems          0, 1, 2+
Medical Professional Societies          0, 1, 2+
Community Colleges          0, 1, 2+
State/ Local/ Tribal Public Health Agency 0, 1, 2+
State Primary Care Association          0, 1, 2+
Medicare Quality Improvement  Org.          0, 1, 2+
State Medicaid Director (if applicable)          0, 1, 2+
Local Quality Improvement Org.          0, 1, 2+

Above is an excerpt;  please go to ONC’s HIT Extension Program: Regional Centers Cooperative Agreement Program site for complete information.

See previous e-Healthcare Marketing post about Regional Extension Centers Grant Program FAQs.

FAQs on State Health Information Exchange Program Released By HHS: Sept 11 Deadline

State HIE Cooperative Agreement Program: 
Frequently Asked Questions  (Main FAQ Page)

     
General Questions
      Questions for Potential Applicants
      September 11, 2009 deadline for State HIE Letter of Intent was reconfirmed in the 10 Questions and Answers about the State HIE Program posted in the FAQs on the ONC site as of September 1, 2009. ONC encourages users to check its FAQ page frequently since regular changes are expected.

      GENERAL QUESTIONS include purpose and goal of State HIE agreement, state role in “meaningful use” of EHRs by 2014, working relationship of states to federal government and private sector, and addressing differences in levels of HIE and EHR adoption between and within states.
      QUESTIONS FOR POTENTIAL APPLICANTS are used to explain who is eligible, describe application process; clarify deadline for Letter of Intent–September 11, 2009; explain rolling schedule for grant awards, describe ONC-State integration of existing State HIE plans within new HIE grants framework, and confirm that all states and territories will be funded for HIEs.

Facts-in-Brief
Deadline:
ONC reconfirmed that the  deadline for each state’s Letter of Intent is September 11, 2009.
Fund: ONC intends to provide each state and US territory an exclusive grant as an individual state or as part of a multi-state application that succesfully fufills the application requirements. Total of $564 million will be awarded on a rolling basis beginning in January 2010, including for planning purposes where necessary.
Exclusive: Only the State or a State-Designated Entity in each state or territory, either individually or as part of a multi-state program, will receive an award.  ONC will only accept one application per state or territory, though multi-state initiatives may apply. To ensure every state and territory is covered, ONC may eventually make award to another entity if an application is not submitted.
Three Level Evaluation: States must determine where they are in the process of implementing health information exchange: “no existing plan; non-compliant existing plan; compliant existing plan.” ONC will work with each state to integrate existing state plans with the requirements of “meaningful use.”
ONC Web site on State HIE Cooperative Agreement Program: The ONC page contains links to Announcement, location for official documents, Facts-At-A-Glance, and FAQs.

Prior e-Healthcare Marketing post with ONC State HIE Deadlines

REGIONAL CENTERS PROGRAM FAQ UPDATES CONTINUE
As ONC promised, FAQs on Regional Extension Centers Program will continue to be updated. Updates for Sept. 2, 2009 are occurring today. See prior e-Healthcare Marketing post for links, and remember to check back for both sets of FAQs. Or go directly to ONC FAQs about Regional Extension Centers Program.