New Jersey Sends HIE Operational Plan to ONC

New Jersey Health Information Exchange Operational Plan: August 13, 2010
Includes Map of Current HIE Landscape

New Jersey sent its Operational Plan for State  Health Information Exchange Cooperation Agreement to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT on August 13, 2010. Per the report, New Jersey submitted its initial “State HIT Plan in October 2009 with an additional update in January 2010.” Plan is posted on NJ Health IT Commission Web site, with excerpts below which include the cover letter from NJ State HIE Coordinator Colleen Woods and the Executive Summary.

[Clicking on any of the four figures will give you a clearer view of those figures.]
Operational Plan PDF [2.2M]
NJ State HIT Operational Plan 2010

COVER LETTER
August 13, 2010  

David Blumenthal MD, MPP
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
Department of Health and Human Services 
Washington, DC 20201

Dear Dr. Blumenthal:
Attached is New Jersey’s HIT Operational Plan which represents a continuation of our planning efforts started in 2009 with the submission to the Office of the National Coordinator for HIT of our State HIT Plan in October 2009 with an additional update in January 2010. Our Operational Plan represents a significant collaborative effort that included:  

  • New Jersey State Medicaid leadership
  • Director of NJ-HITEC, our Regional Extension Center
  • Executive Director of the New Jersey HIT Commission
  • Director of the New Jersey Office for eHIT Development
  • Leadership from our four funded HIEs
  • Leaders from several unfunded HIEs
  • Representative from New Jersey Hospital Association

I am very pleased with the result and believe this represents a significant step for the State of New Jersey in bringing fundamental change in the delivery, quality, and value of healthcare in the State. With this Plan we bring:   

  • A re- commitment for New Jersey to be a national leader in HIT
  • A drive to leverage and harness health information to improve, monitor and protect the health of our citizens
  • A goal to meet and exceed Federal mandates for each person to have an electronic health record by 2014

As the New Jersey Statewide HIT Coordinator I am committed to working with all state departments and agencies, the healthcare provider community, and other key stakeholders, to implement and facilitate the HIT Strategic and Operational Plans for New Jersey in accordance with nationally recognized Federal standards.We look forward to your timely review and approval of our HIT Operational Plan and continued collaboration on this vital issue for our country and for the State of New Jersey. We also request timely release of implementation funds for our four ONC funded HIEs. 

Sincerely, 
Ms. Colleen Woods 
New Jersey Statewide HIT Coordinator 

NEW JERSEY  STATE OPERATIONAL PLAN
Submitted August 13, 2010
 

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This HIT Operational Plan serves as the approach and schedule to implement New Jersey’s Strategic HIT Plan previously submitted in October 2009 and further refined in January 2010. Execution of this Plan will enhance the quality, delivery, and value of healthcare while supporting New Jersey’s hospitals and eligible providers in achieving and demonstrating meaningful use of Health Information Technology (HIT). The State acknowledges that the HIT and HIE landscape at the federal and state levels is evolving, and that this is a living document requiring ongoing review, changes, and refinement. Our plan, by design, is nimble and adaptable to the expected changes and evolution of HIT strategy. 

A Unique Approach - Our approach, depicted in Figure 1.1 below, builds on existing, long-standing HIT projects across the State combined with newly funded ARRA initiatives to ensure that all expenditures and resources are leveraged in one cohesive, strategic plan. Recognizing that complex and functional HIT systems are already established, and that expertise is available and willing to be shared, building our plan on a “ground-up” strategy makes perfect sense. Realizing that barriers do exist, our leadership is committed to identifying and eliminating barriers, while ensuring that duplication of effort and expenses are avoided. NJHIN Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1 New Jersey Health Information Network (NJHIN) 

Our approach recognizes that this is a time of unprecedented change in the Heath Information Technology landscape. Simultaneously, the following conditions and projects are occurring across New Jersey:  

  • Community-based physicians are moving to better understand the impact of adopting certified electronic health record (EHR) technology in order to be eligible for “meaningful use” incentives.
  • Hospitals are expanding and upgrading their IT systems to ensure “meaningful use” eligibility as well.
  • The newly created regional extension center, the New Jersey Health Information Technology Extension Center (NJ-HITEC) has begun to assist physicians in understanding EHR technology, selecting technology vendors and becoming eligible for “meaningful use” incentives.
  • Four ONC funded regional Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) are in various stages of becoming incorporated, developing solution strategies and building/testing new infrastructure. Health-e-cITi-NJ has been incorporated as a 501(c)(3) organization. Jersey Health Connect has been incorporated and is awaiting 501(c)(3) designation.
  • No less than eight distinct HIE models have been identified throughout the State that are in a position to be leveraged into the state plan.
  • New Jersey Medicaid is progressing toward its own HIE model and has begun implementation of a crucial Master Client Index project.

The New Jersey Health Information Network (NJHIN) will integrate these various projects and initiatives. In effect, NJHIN consists of a “network of networks” in which centralized shared services will provide: 

  • A focal point for accessing state-managed data (e.g., various state registries).
  • A record locator service (RLS) for locating records within the four new regional HIEs, the Medicaid HIE and the other existing HIE initiatives across the State.
  • A conduit to the federal NHIN Direct and NHIN Connect networks.

Key aspects of the NJHIN include: 

  • Leveraging of significant work in progress through a “ground up” collaborative effort between state HIT leadership and several community-based healthcare organizations within the State.
  • A multi-track effort leveraging Medicaid capabilities and funding, local HIE leadership, provider capabilities, NJ-HITEC services, and overall state HIT leadership.   
  • A centralized approach where appropriate, e.g., Master Patient Index/Master Client Index, while leveraging community based innovation and leadership.
  • NJHIN will leverage Medicaid and all the MMIS medical history data that already exists for ~1.3M citizens in our state representing 15% of our population.

Significant effort and investment have already been made in evolving the NJHIN. The release of implementation funding for the four approved HIEs will accelerate the realization of the NJHIN.

Continuing Our Leadership – New Jersey has been in the forefront of promoting electronic health records. Some historical context includes: 

  • New Jersey’s active interest in electronic systems as a means of increasing healthcare quality and reducing costs began in 1993 through a study to analyze current methods, barriers, and recommendations for achieving savings and administrative simplification in the New Jersey healthcare system.
  • This led to the passage of the New Jersey Health Information Network and Technology (HINT) law in 1999 which set a precedent for health information technology standards for interoperability in the Garden State.
  • During 2004-2005 the New Jersey Hospital Association began facilitating discussion focused on HIE development and deployment. This led to the emergence of several community-based HIE initiatives which have become the basis of the current NJHIN.
  • As early as 2004, some New Jersey hospital systems began developing HIE models, primarily within their corporate structures, and have accomplished sophisticated health information sharing solutions that are ready to be integrated into the statewide plan.
  • In 2008 the New Jersey Health Information Technology Act was passed which mandates the creation of a plan to implement a secure, integrated, inter-operative and statewide infrastructure for the sharing of electronic health records. The Act also created a Health Information Technology Commission to oversee the development, implementation and oversight of the plan, in partnership with the Office for eHIT Development.
  • In October 2009 New Jersey submitted one of the first State HIT Plans to ONC and received initial approval of the four requested HIE implementation grants.
  • In March 2010, through a transformation grant from CMS, the New Jersey Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (DMAHS) initiated a project to build Phase I of our Master Patient Identifier (MPI) capability which will promote the critical interoperable exchange of Medicaid, Immunization, and Blood Lead Screening databases among New Jersey’s departments of Health and Senior Services and Children and Families, Managed Care Organizations, Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) providers, hospitals and the Department of Human Services.  
    • In March of 2010, DMHAS initiated a Planning APD to CMS to secure planning funds to begin the State Medicaid HIT Plan (SMHP) that will be leveraged and integrated into the statewide planning process. 
    • Implementation planning is underway for the NJ-HITEC which will promote broad-based adoption of electronic health records. Funding for this effort was received in mid-2010.  

Our leadership continues at the national and state level as we aggressively move forward in transforming the healthcare delivery system of New Jersey.

Our Fundamental Strategies – In addition to supporting the strategic direction articulated in our State HIT Plan submitted in October 2009, the following represents the fundamental strategies for our HIT Operational Plan. These strategies include the following:  

  • Medicaid is a key partner in the execution of this HIT Operational Plan and we will leverage CMS funding to help build the infrastructure for statewide health information exchange.
  • A core tenet of the program is the elimination of disparities of care by ensuring that underserved communities, including children, are represented in evolving HIT/HIE efforts. We must also be aware of the potential for a “digital divide” between more affluent segments of the population and those who are underserved.
  • We will leverage our 98% broadband coverage (#1 in the US) to ensure all providers and healthcare service recipients have access to the right information at the right time.
  • We will leverage all funding sources (public and private) to ensure the financial viability and stability of the HIT program.
  • Through effective HIT coordination we will eliminate duplicative efforts and projects across the HIT landscape and ensure efficiency of efforts by centralizing and sharing policies, standards, and infrastructure as appropriate.
  • We will effectively manage the transformational change in the New Jersey healthcare community through the efforts of the NJ-HITEC and the Office of the Statewide HIT Coordinator. 

Coordinating Our Efforts – Ms. Colleen Woods has recently been named as New Jersey’s Statewide HIT Coordinator. Among her many outstanding qualifications Ms. Woods was most recently the CIO for the New Jersey Department of Human Services providing technology direction to the State Medicaid Program. With her selection, we have adjusted our overall governance structure for the HIT Program pertaining to HIT direction and policy. As depicted below the Program is wide-ranging with a varied and complex set of stakeholders.    

NJ HIT Program Context Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2 New Jersey HIT Program Context  

Effective governance is essential. Given this context we have designed and implemented a governance capability to drive successful program performance and results.  

NJ HIT Program Governance Figure 1.3Figure 1.3 New Jersey HIT Program Governance 

The ongoing transformation of the healthcare system in New Jersey from a paper-based healthcare information environment to a digital healthcare information environment is complex and will require collaboration between multiple parties with potential conflicting interests. We are confident our approach will build upon our early successes in bringing together the necessary constituents (both public and private) to continue the transformation to provide access to reliable healthcare information that improves the quality and efficiency of care.  

                      ***************************************************

As described in this Operational Plan, the State acknowledges and accepts the following HIT program responsibilities:  

  • To ensure alignment with Medicaid and other public health programs.
  • To design and manage a transparent multi-stakeholder process to guide and implement the program.
  • To monitor and track meaningful use of HIE capabilities through a well-coordinated and effective communication process.
  • To ensure the accuracy, security, and privacy of personal health records.
  • To assure all stakeholders that information sharing is consistent with state and federal security and privacy provisions.
  • To ensure effective gap closing strategies related to HIE capabilities for meaningful use exist and are effectively managed.
  • To educate the public (patients and providers alike) to understand, embrace, and realize the benefits of EHR technology.
  • To take the lead in developing statewide, standardized policies and procedures that are consistent with those established at the national level.

In addition to the technical aspects of establishing the NJHIN, the HIT Operational Plan addresses the regulatory, financial sustainability, governance, and project management approaches to effectively implement our strategies. The sections that follow begin with the HIT Operational Plan requirements (highlighted) from the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement Program Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) and the related Program Information Notice (PIN), dated July 6, 2010, followed by our response.  

This HIT Operational Plan is submitted to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) for review and approval.

HIE Landscape in New Jersey
Excerpted from Section 9.0 HIE ARCHITECTURE AND STANDARDS
[Clicking on the map below will give you a clearer view of the map.]
HIE Landscape of New Jersey Figure 9.1

#                    #                        #

For strategic and operational plans from 25 other states, please see updated post on e-Healthcare Marketing.

NIST Publishes Approved Testing Procedures for Electronic Health Records

NIST Publishes Approved Testing Procedures for Electronic Health Records
NIST Press Release for Immediate Release: August 17, 2010
“In efforts to help the nation’s health care industry make the transition to the digital age in an effective and meaningful fashion, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a set of approved procedures for testing information technology systems that work with electronic health records  (EHRs).  Released in draft form earlier this year (see “NIST, Partners Develop Testing Infrastructure for Health IT Systems,” NIST Tech Beat for March 16, 2010, at http://www.nist.gov/itl/hit_031610.cfm), the approved and finalized testing procedures are now available for use.

“Under a certification program established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the National Coordinator (HHS/ONC), testing organizations authorized by HHS/ONC can use the tools to evaluate EHR software and systems that vendors would like to sell to doctor’s offices, hospitals and other health care providers.  Starting next year, the federal government will provide extra Medicare and Medicaid payments to health care providers that implement EHR systems certified to meet ONC requirements that conform to technical standards and are put to “meaningful use,” performing specifically defined functions.

“These ONC-approved test procedures help ensure that electronic health records function properly and work interchangeably across systems developed by different vendors.  The set of 45 approved test procedures evaluate components of electronic health records such as their encryption, how they plot and display growth charts, and how they control access so that only authorized users can access their information.

“The development of these tools was mandated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in order to support a health IT infrastructure.”

“Notice of the approved test procedures appears in the August 9, 2010, Federal Register. For more information, see http://healthcare.nist.gov/use_testing/finalized_requirements.html  and http://healthit.hhs.gov/certification ”

#                 #              #

NIST: Health IT Standards and Testing
SEE LIST OF PDFs OF TESTING REQUIREMENTS ON PAGE ON NIST SITE

List and text below excerpted from NIST site on 8/18/2010.

Approved Test Procedures
“The Approved (Pending) Test Procedures were formally approved on August 2, 2010 for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) Temporary Certification Program. Notice of the approval appears in the August 9, 2010 Federal Register. The set of Test Procedures marked ‘Approved (Pending)’ have been reissued as ‘Approved’. The approval process did not result in changes to the test procedures. However technical corrections, based on feedback, are being made. Changes to a test procedure are indicated through its change log.

“The Final Rule and related information is found at http://healthit.hhs.gov.

“Questions about the applicability of the initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria should be directed to ONC at ONC.Certification@hhs.gov. Questions about the test procedures should be directed to NIST at hit-tst-fdbk@nist.gov. Note that NIST will automatically forward to ONC at the address above any questions regarding the applicability of the standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria. Questions about functions and activities of the ATCBs should be directed to ONC at ONC.Certification@hhs.gov

“The following contains the approved test procedures for evaluating conformance of complete EHRs and/or EHR Modules to the initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria defined in the Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria published on July 13, 2010.”

Criteria # Certification Criteria Test Method Date Published
§170.302 (a) Drug-drug, drug-allergy interaction checks PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (b) Drug formulary checks PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (c) Maintain up-to-date problem list PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (d) Maintain active medication list PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (e) Maintain active medication allergy list PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (f)(1) Vital signs PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (f)(2) Body mass index PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (f)(3) Plot and display growth charts PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (g) Smoking status PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (h) Incorporate lab results PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (i) Generate patient lists PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (j) Medication reconciliation PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (k) Submission to immunization registries PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (l) Public health surveillance PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (m) Patient specific education resources PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (n) Automate measure calculation PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (o) Access control PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (p) Emergency access PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (q) Automatic log-off PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (r) Audit log PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (s) Integrity PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (t) Authentication PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (u) General encryption PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (v) Encryption when exchanging electronic health information PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.302 (w) Accounting of disclosures (optional) PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (a) Computerized provider order entry PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (b) Electronic prescribing PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (c) Record demographics PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (d) Patient reminders PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (e) Clinical decision support PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (f) Electronic copy of health information PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (g) Timely access PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (h) Clinical summaries PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (i) Exchange clinical information and patient summary record PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.304 (j) Calculate and submit clinical quality measures PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (a) Computerized provider order entry PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (b) Record demographics PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (c) Clinical decision support PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (d)(1) Electronic copy of health information PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (d)(2) Electronic copy of health informationNote: For discharge summary PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (e) Electronic copy of discharge information PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (f) Exchange clinical information and patient summary record PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (g) Reportable lab results PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (h) Advanced directives PDF Icon 08/13/2010
§170.306 (i) Calculate and submit clinical quality measures PDF Icon 08/13/2010

NJ Regional Extension Center Launches Site, Announces RFPs

NJ-HITEC Sets Schedule for EHR Vendor RFRs (Request for Response),
Letters of Intent Due Aug 18
www.njhitec.org
Excerpted from NJ-HITEC Web site on August 13, 2010.

NJ-HITEC

NJ-HITEC

“New Jersey – Health Information Technology Extension Center (NJ-HITEC) is a federally recognized Regional Extension Center located on the campus of the New Jersey Institute of Technology. The sole purpose of NJ-HITEC is to assist New Jersey primary care providers in the successful adoption, implementation and use of electronic health records systems and to become meaningful users of those healthcare technologies, in order to deliver quality care improvements to New Jersey residents throughout the state.”

[The  NJ-HITEC "website is currently under construction. Please be  sure to check back frequently as" they update and expand the site.]

Schedule for Response for Supported EHR Vendors
Letter of Intent Due Aug 18;  RFR Due Aug 27
FAQ Session Aug 20

Event Date
NJ-HITEC releases RFR August 13th, 2010
E-mail letter of Intent Due by 5 pm August 18th, 2010
Last day for Vendor Questions – Vendor FAQ session August 20th,  2010
Answers Posted on Website August 24th, 2010
RFR Due August 27th, 2010
Vendor Demonstrations & Site Visits September & October, 2010

Excerpted from Request for Response (RFR) for
Supported EHR Vendors on August 13, 2010:
NJ-HITEC was setup “to support and serve health care providers in becoming meaningful users of electronic health records (EHRs). NJ-HITEC will work towards this goal by:

  • Providing  training and support services to assist doctors and other providers in adopting EHRs
  • Offering information and guidance to help with EHR implementation and achieving Meaningful Use
  • Giving technical assistance as and when needed”

“New Jersey has nearly 33,000 physicians, among which 18,343 of which are primary care providers. NJ-HITEC has been established as a 5.01(C) 3 organization with a mission to convert 5,000 Priority Primary Care Providers (Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, Family Medicine, Adolescent Medicine, OB/GYN, Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants) to meaningful users of Electronic Health Record technology in the first two years.   

“This request for responses is being issued to identify and select multiple EHR solutions in order to create a “Supported Vendor List”. This Request for Response addresses NJ-HITEC’s mission to advance the adoption, implementation and meaningful use of health IT among health care providers to improve the safety, quality, accessibility, availability and efficiency of health care for the citizens of New Jersey. NJ-HITEC is seeking vendors whose products are capable of bringing providers to meaningful use in a cost efficient and effective manner and is looking forward to contract with qualified vendors. 

“NJ-HITEC views the selection of these vendors as part of the overall process in New Jersey to create an effective electronic health records system. That system will be accessible to both the individual and to his or her physician, hospital and other health care providers.

“As a part of the qualifying process, respondents may be asked to provide a demonstration of their proposed solutions. The project will be consistent with New Jersey Health Information Technology implementation plan and the NJ Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) and State Medicaid HIT Plan (SMHP) plans.”

The Vendor FAQ conference call will be held on
August 20th, at 11 am – 12 pm EST.
Conference Call Number: 218-936-7988
Passcode: 211

Request for Response for EHR s and Instructions
Documents for Downloads
-RFR Document
-Addendum I
-Addendum II

NJ-HITEC   –   NJHITEC   –  NJ REC

Blumenthal Blogs: Private Sector Shows Support for Meaningful Use

Private Sector Shows Support for Meaningful Use
Friday, August 13th, 2010 | Posted by: Dr. David Blumenthal on ONC Health IT Buzz blog and re-posted here by e-Healthcare Marketing. 

Health IT is a team effort. The whole point is to increase communication and coordination among the different players in the health care system. You just can’t go it alone in this field.

The good news is that, when you have a solid plan and a worthy objective, lots of talented people want to join the team and contribute to the effort.

The HITECH Act got the ball rolling. But government can only take this so far by itself. To provide real momentum for the widespread adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records, the private sector has to be there to push it along.

Now that the Department of Health and Human Services has announced final rules for meaningful use of electronic health records, we have a framework that will enable action by players across the board—in both the private and public sectors.

Some of those players announced their action plans yesterday—putting their weight behind the meaningful use goals and pledging to work together.

At a recent meeting on Advancing EHR Adoption and Meaningful Use sponsored by Health Affairs and Brandeis University’s Health Industry Forum at the National Press Club, payers, providers, and certification and licensing boards came together to announce early plans for supporting rapid adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records.

  • Payers (Aetna, Highmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, United Health Group, and Wellpoint) announced plans for incentive programs that will work in parallel with the CMS program and utilize the meaningful use objectives.
  • Leading provider groups (the Christiana Care Health System, Partners HealthCare, and ThedaCare) announced training and requirements for clinicians.
  • And, perhaps most significantly, certification and licensure bodies (the Federation of State Medical Boards and the American Board of Medical Specialties) announced steps for assisting and encouraging physicians in the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records, with the ultimate goal that their use will become an element of professional certification.

With the meaningful use goals as their framework, these representatives of the private sector are formulating a strategy for the transformation of health care in our country through the use of health IT. These are indeed significant and encouraging first steps, occurring a mere three weeks after announcement of the final phase 1 meaningful use rules. We applaud their efforts and we look forward to more payers, providers, and others in both the public and private sectors joining the team to move together towards our common goal.

– Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
#                            #                        #

To post comments directly on ONC Health IT Buzz blog, click here.

Related Articles/Posts

For an excellent recap of the Health Affairs and Brandeis forum at the National Press Club referenced above, see August 9, 2010 article by Kate Ackerman, iHealthBeat Senior Editor rum, on iHealth Beat called “Private Sector Picks Up Baton To Help Drive ‘Meaningful Use’. “

For links to the blog posts on Health Affairs blog about this forum, see earlier post on e-Healthcare Marketing.

ONC Info Calls: EHR Temp Certification–Aug 18, 25

Office of the National Coordinator
Holds Informational Calls on Temporary Certification Program

Excerpted from email received August 12, 2010
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is hosting a series of informational calls the purpose of which is to provide an overview of, and answer questions related to, the temporary certification program for electronic health record (EHR) technology.  

Participants will hear an overview of the program and be able to ask questions.

Two calls are scheduled for August 2010. Added Powerpoint slides for August 18 and 25, 2010 call below.

1.      Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. EDT

Call-in Information:

Phone Number: 888-324-9617

Participant Passcode: 4584230

Meeting Materials August 18, 2010:
ONC Certification Program Educational Session [PPT – 284 KB]

Meeting Materials August 25, 2010:
ONC Certification Program Educational Session [PPT - 284 KB]

2.      Wednesday, August 25, 2010, 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. EDT
Call-in Information:

Phone Number: 888-324-9617

Participant Passcode: 4584230

Recordings and transcripts for each call will be made available on the ONC web site.

For more information about the temporary certification program and the final rule, please visit http://healthit.hhs.gov/certification.

ONC’s Kendall Blogs on Regional Extension Centers’ Support for Providers and Meaningful Use

Regional Extension Centers Prepare for National Effort to Support Providers to Achieve Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Record Systems
Wednesday, August 11th, 2010 | Posted by: Mat Kendall, Director, Office of Provider Adoption Support, on ONC’s Health IT Buzz Blog and republished here by e-Healthcare Marketing. 

To support the adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records, ONC has funded 60 Regional Extension Centers (RECs) across the country. The goal of the RECs is to provide outreach, education, and on-site technical assistance to support 100,000 primary care physicians implementing electronic health records (EHRs) into their practices and working to attain meaningful use of their systems. The RECs received $643 million in federal funds for the next two years and will receive an additional $42 million in subsequent years to help physicians make the transition to EHRs.

Electronic health records and health IT have the potential to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of health care, so each REC must be prepared to help  providers find the best system for their needs while managing the effects of health IT implementation on the practice. To that end, ONC is hosting five regional meetings this summer to provide REC staff members with an opportunity to receive hands-on training about the new meaningful use regulations, as well as to share best practices with one another.

The first three meetings, held recently in Kansas City, MO, Providence, RI, and Nashville, TN, created opportunities for the regional REC staff to get together in an environment that encouraged learning and information sharing. Conference participants attended educational sessions and were given the opportunity to network with CMS employees, their state partners, health information exchange colleagues, and ONC staff from other programs.  The remaining regional meetings will be held in Chicago, IL, on August 10-11, and Salt Lake City, UT, on August 17-18.

As part of ONC’s effort to increase outreach and support to primary care providers, the Office of Provider Adoption Support (OPAS) meets with each REC at each regional meeting in order to better understand their unique program goals, opportunities, and challenges.  Additionally, the conference sessions are designed to give REC participants the practical hands-on training they’ll need to help their providers achieve meaningful use. Participants were eager to learn what other programs were doing and, during group sessions, they were able to share ideas, lessons learned, and best practices.

These summer meetings are also an opportunity to familiarize the RECs with the support tools made available to them in the REC program.  Those tools will help the RECs continue to collaborate online and share ideas away from the face-to-face time that the regional meetings provide.

ONC continues to educate the RECs on the process of getting the nation’s physicians to meaningful use.  OPAS is always interested in input from our stakeholders on the messages that are most important to convey to the RECs as they work to support the widespread adoption of health IT among the nation’s healthcare community.   We welcome your feedback and ideas.
#                #                 #
To post comments directly on ONC’s Health IT Buzz blog, please click  here.
 
See a new directory just compiled by e-Healthcare Marketing of the REC Web sites targeting physicians and eligible professionals.

Patient Care Summary Exchange: State HIE Conference Call

ONC’s State HIE Technical Assistance Webinar:
Patient Care Summary Exchange and Meaningful Use
August 6, 2010
Excerpted from the State HIE Leadership Forum/Presentations and Webinars Page on August 11, 2010
Slide Set PDF
Audio

The audio (and appears to have been presented in teleconference audio format only) starts out talking about “meaningful use” since  the focus is on the exchange of  Patient Care Summaries and Stage 1 of Meaningful Use. It  includes a discussion about the Continuity of Care Record (CCR) and the newer Continuity of Care Document (CCD); NHIN direct and NHIN Exchange; and several case studies presented by the people involved (NEHEN in Massachussetts; MedVirginia in Virginia, NHIN, and Social Security Administration; KHIE in Kentucky; and Rhode Island HIE and NHIN Direct).

Excerpts selected from slides:
Care Summaries & Stage 1 Meaningful Use
Based on the Meaningful Use Final Rule, “eligible professional, eligible hospital or CAH who transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50% of transitions of care and referrals.”

–Core requirement is to perform at least one test of EHR’s capacity ot electronically exchange information.
–To fulfill menu set requirement, EHR must enable a user to electronically transmit a patient summary record to other providers and organizations including
        –at a minmum, diagnostic test results, problem list, medication list, and a medication allergy list
       –uses HL7 CCD or ASTM CCR

Stage 1 Meaningful Use Objectives that might require sharing of a CCD/CCR:
–Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information upon request
–Provide a clinical summary for each visit
–Exchange clinical information electronically with other providers and patient authorized entities
–Provide summary care record for each transition of care and referral
–Provide patients with an electronic copy of their discharge instructions and procedures
–Other MU requirements could use clinical documents (e.g. lab results, public health reporting)

Initial Set of Standards
–Requires clinical summaries for patients for each office visit in “human readable” format  and on electronic media
–Clinical summary can (be) either HITSP C32-compliant CCD or ASTM CCR
–Why 2 standards?
            — CCD growing in popularity
            — CCR still in use, especially among early adopters
            — In some circumstances the CCR is easier, faster, and requires fewer resources to implement than the CCD
             — Electronic exchange not required in Stage 1, so why make anyone migrate now from one format to the other?

NHIN Specifications
–Both NHIN Exchaneg and NHIN Direct offers means to transport clinical summaries
–Both mechanisms support Stage 1 Meaningful Use
–Both rely on standards for effective communication
–NHIN Exchange offers the means for transporting care summaries; relies on more spohisticated technology, most suitable when participants do not necesssarily know each other personally
–NHIN Direct offers specifications that enable transport of care summaries; relies on simpler technology, most suitable when participants know each other personally and have a data exchange relationship
–Many states are interested in supporting both models for different workflows.

State HIE Strategies
–Can take several forms, just like statewide HIE can take several forms
–Requires some elements of policy, some elements of infrastructure
–Use data from environmental scan to understand current situation, capabilities, pilots, including other relevant states
–Work with RECs to develop consistent message and appropriate capabilities; rely on their services
–Insist on common terminology and coding
–Keep EHR system vendors’ feet to the fire in implementing capabilities “in the field”
–Recognize that manysites are still using HL7 v2 messages
–Provide HIE services to support care summaries
         –Full services like RLS, MPI, directory, IHE XCA
         –Enabling service for NHIN Direct like provider directory
–Consider the impact of the availability of many clinical documents when exchange is successful

Data Aggregation and Data Content issues to be considered are highlighted.

Your Comments Please: Population Health and Care Coordination ‘Meaningful Use’

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup: Two Hearings on MU Criteria
Monday, August 9th, 2010 | Posted by: Judy Sparrow originally on ONC’s FACA Blog  and republished by e-Healthcare Marketing blog here.

The final rules on the meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) are out, and they are expected to help improve Americans’ health, increase safety and reduce health care costs through expanded use of EHRs. The regulation defines the “meaningful use” objectives that providers must meet to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments. This commences a five-year national initiative to adopt and meaningfully use electronic health records for health care.

To assist in understanding the various meaningful use (MU) criteria, the Health IT (HIT) Policy Committee’s Meaningful Use Workgroup held a series of hearings on the MU criteria as outlined in the final rule. The HIT Policy Committee and ONC are both interested in receiving extensive public input to the MU criteria, particularly as we begin to formulate Stage 2 and Stage 3 of the MU criteria.

The last two MU criteria hearings were on Population Health and Care Coordination , and a series of questions were posed to the panelists for consideration and comment. We would welcome any further comments from the public on those questions and/or criteria.

Population Health Hearing – July 31, 2010  

Testimony from the Population Health hearing will help the Meaningful Use Workgroup formulate recommendations to the HIT Policy Committee and National Coordinator on what effects public health agencies might expect on population health as the nation moves toward meaningful use (MU) of certified EHRs.  

The focus of the testimony revolved around two primary questions:  

  • What population health effects should public health agencies expect as the nation moves toward meaningful use (MU) of certified EHRs?
  • How can governmental public health agencies leverage these MU efforts and investments and the goals of a learning health system to improve population health?  

In addition, the Population Health panelists specifically addressed the following:  

Panel 1:  Achieving population health through meaningful use:  How do governmental public health (PH) agencies view the process to date?  

  • What are the current electronic data systems, are they interoperable and do they connect to any EHRs for mandated electronic reporting?
  • From your unique jurisdictional view, does your PH agency have the capacity to use the 3 types of data to be sent under Stage 1 meaningful use (MU) criteria in a way that impacts population health?
  • What do you perceive as barriers to MU of PH data and information to achieve desired population health outcomes?
  • How are governmental public health agencies planning to leverage increasing access to community HIT assets (e.g., EHR data, chronic disease registries and MU criteria) or other ONC efforts (e.g., health information exchange, Regional Extension Centers, nationwide health information network, Beacon communities, Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects) to support improved population and public health outcomes? 
  • Based on your experience, how is PH working toward a more integrated, enterprise approach to data and information sharing and interoperable infrastructure promoted through MU criteria and measures to support improved population health outcomes?  

Panel 2:  Experiences and current status of MU-like projects:  How do governmental public health agencies use MU-like criteria or measures to achieve population health?  

  • What MU-like data and public health applications and/or public health-EHR projects have you developed in your jurisdiction? How do they impact on public health surveillance, care coordination or other essential public health services?
  • How might the results of your public health-EHR project inform and be learning opportunities for: 1) other public health jurisdictions, 2) HIT policy development, 3) evaluation of Stage 1 MU criteria, and 4) considerations for Stages 2 and 3 MU criteria?
  • What are your next priorities for the described public health-EHR project? 
  • What should be logical next steps for MU criteria development?

Panel 3:  Potential areas where the HIT Policy Committee consideration:  Where should the committee focus its attention to support MU measure and criteria that complement the public health mission?  

  • What policy, legal and/or technical issues do you perceive as barriers to getting to improved population health outcomes? 
  • Are there any specific approaches to data standards, aggregation and/or infrastructure that would help achieve better population health outcomes?
  • How should PH contribute to the concept of a learning health system?
  • What future state might we envision as public health agencies gain access to population health information to drive improved health outcomes?

Please make your comments on the original FACA blog on the ONC site about these Population Health MU Criteria.

Care Coordination Hearing – August 5, 2010

The Meaningful Use Workgroup’s Care Coordination hearing focused on the specified functionalities beginning in Stage 1 of Meaningful Use, which involves electronically capturing health information, and communicating that information for the coordination of care.  

The Care Coordination panelists specifically addressed the following questions:  

Panel 1:  Current HIT Support of Care Coordination

  • What are the key care coordination needs that are being, or could be addressed using health information technology (HIT) today?  
  • How has the electronic health record (EHR) supported, or not supported, your medical home to date, and what are potential implications for future meaningful use requirements (e.g., stage 2 or 3)?   

Panel 2:  Transitions and Care Coordination

  • What issues and deficiencies in care transitions can be effectively addressed by HIT?  
  • How is HIT being used, or will be used, within care to expedite referrals with a team, referrals outside a team, and transitions between settings?  
  • How can HIT assist with care coordination in chronic disease management?  

Panel 3:  Care Coordination in the Ambulatory Environment

  • What is the evidence for effective use of HIT to support coordination of care in the ambulatory environment? 
  • What might EHRs do in the future to assist with care coordination?  
  • How can the electronic record help reduce readmission rates, and unnecessary emergency room visits?  
  • How do privacy and trust issues affect these areas?

Please make your comments on the original FACA blog on the ONC site about these Care Coordination MU Criteria.

Regional Extension Centers Web Site Directory

Regional Extension Centers Directory As of August 10, 2010
Using the Web site of the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT as the starting point, e-Healthcare Marketing compiled this updated list of the Regional Extension Center (REC) Web sites which target physicians and eligible professionals. Early versions of the list contained URLs for those organizations that received REC  funds, prior to the development of the clinician-focused Web sites. There are a few cases where dedicated Web sites or Web pages are still in development. Please let us know if there are corrections and updates. Thank you.

State Actual REC Site Regional Extension Center
AK http://www.ak-ehealth.com/AeHNServices/AlaskasRegional
ExtensionCenter/tabid/114/Default.aspx
Alaska eHealth Network
AL http://al-rec.org University of South Alabama
AR http://www.hitarkansas.com HIT Arkansas
AZ http://www.azhec.org/
regionalextensioncenter.jsp
Arizona Health-e Connection (AzHeC)
CA http://www.calhipso.org CalHIPSO (North)
CA http://www.calhipso.org CalHIPSO (South)
CA http://www.lacare.org/aboutlacare
/hitec-la
HITEC-LA
CO http://www.corhio.org/co-rec.aspx Colorado Regional Extension Center (CORHIO)
CT http://www.ehealthconnecticut.org/
REC.aspx
eHealth Connecticut
DC http://www.dcrec.dcpca.org  District of Columbia Primary Care Association (DCPCA)
DC http://www.nihb.org National Indian Health Board (NIHB)
DE http://www.dehitrec.org Quality Insights of Delaware
FL http://www.chcalliance.org/Services/
RegionalExtensionCenter.aspx
Rural and North Florida Regional Extension Center
FL http://www.southfloridarec.org South Florida Regional Extension Center Collaborative
FL http://www.ucf-rec.org University of Central Florida
FL http://health.usf.edu/paperfree University of South Florida
GA http://primarycareforall.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=
category&layout=blog&id=62&Itemid=207
Morehouse School of Medicine
HI http://www.hawaiihie.org/rec.html  Hawaii Health Information Exchange
IA http://www.iowahitrec.org IFMC Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center (Iowa HITREC)
IL http://www.ilhitrec.org Illinois Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center (IL-HITREC)
IL http://www.chitrec.org Chicago Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center (CHITREC)
IN http://www.ihitec.purdue.edu Purdue University
KS http://www.kfmc.org/rec Kansas Foundation for Medical Care, Inc. (KFMC)
KY http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kentucky-Regional-Extension-Center/114625925251991 University of Kentucky Research Foundation
LA http://www.lhcqf.org/
regional-extension-center.html
Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum
MA http://www.maehi.org  MA Technology Corporation
MD http://www.crisphealth.org/REC/
tabid/106/Default.aspx
Chesapeake Regional Information System for Our Patients
ME http://www.hinfonet.org HealthInfoNet
MI http://www.mceita.org Michigan Center for Effective IT Adoption (M-CEITA)
MN, ND http://www.khareach.org Regional Extension Assistance Center for Health Information Technology (REACH)
MS http://www.eqhs.org/rec Regional Extension Center for Health Information Technology in Mississippi
MO http://www.assistancecenter.missouri.edu Missouri HIT Assistance Center
MT http://www.healthtechnologyservice.com Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation (MPQHF)
NC http://www.ahecqualitysource.com University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
NE http://www.widerivertec.org Wide River Technology Extension Center
NJ http://www.njhitec.org NJ-HITEC (New Jersey Institute of Technology)
NM http://www.nmhitrec.org LCF Research
NY http://www.nycreach.org NYC REACH
NY http://nyecrec.org/ New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeC)
OH http://www.healthbridge.org/rec HealthBridge Inc.
OH http://ohiponline.org/Pages/REC.aspx  Ohio Health Information Partnership (OHIP)
OK http://www.ofmq.com/hitrec Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality (OFMQ)
OR http://o-hitec.org O-HITEC
PA http://www.pareacheast.org Quality Insights of Pennsylvania East
PA http://www.pareachwest.org Quality Insights of Pennsylvania West
PR http://www.psm.edu/
RegionalExtensionCenter
Ponce School of Medicine
RI http://www.docehrtalk.org Rhode Island Quality Institute
SC https://www.citiasc.org South Carolina Research Foundation
SD http://www.cahit.dsu.edu South Dakota Regional Extension Center (SD-REC)
TN http://www.tnrec.org Qsource
TX http://www.txrecs.org Texas RECs
TX http://www.centreastrec.org/rec_finder Texas REC Finder
TX http://www.ntrec.org North Texas REC
TX http://www.ttuhsc.edu West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center (WT-HITREC)
TX http://centreastrec.org CentrEast Regional Extension Center
TX http://www.uthouston.edu/gcrec University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
UT, NV http://www.healthinsight.org/
hcp/hrec/hrec.html
Health Insight
VA http://www.vhqc.org/custom-hit.asp VHQC (Virginia Health Quality Center)
VT http://www.vitl.net/rec Vermont Information Technology Leaders
WA, ID http://www.wirecqh.org WI-REC
WI http://www.whitec.org Wisconsin Health Information Technology Extension Center
WV http://www.wvrhitec.org West Virginia Health Improvement

Health Affairs Blog: Advancing EHR Adoption and Meaningful Use

Washington, DC Follow-up to Health Industry Forum at Brandeis
Covered in Series of Post on Health Affairs Blog
In a series of posts collected on Health Affairs blog by Chris Fleming on August 5, 2010, a range of stakeholders wrote articles inspired by their presentations at an August 5 forum held by Health Affairs and Health Industry Forum. This forum was a follow-up to a July 8, 2010 roundtable hosted at Brandeis University with Health Industry Forum. Both sessions featured National Health IT Coordinator David Blumenthal, who was joined by the new CMS Administrator Donald Berwick in the latest session.

Note: Series of Videos from the August 5 event are now available on the Health Affairs Web site.

–Chris Fleming’s Blog Post:
          Advancing Electronic Health Record Adoption and Meaningful Use
–Blumenthal and Berwick:
          Adoption and Meaningful Use of EHRs–The Journey Begins
–Samuel Nussbaum and Charles Kennedy, WellPoint:
          WellPoint: Supporting Meaningful Use Through Incentive Alignment And Hospital Financing
–Donald Fischer, Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield:
          Highmark: Using EHRs To Drive Quality Improvement
–John Toussaint, ThedaCare:
          ThedaCare: Meaningful Use And Continuous Improvement
–Will Bloedow, Retired minister and a ThedaCare patient:
          Through A Patient’s Eyes: The Value of EHRs
–Robert Laskowski, Christiana Care Health System:
          Christiana Care: A Leadership Moment For Hospitals And Physicians
–Gary Gottlieb and Thomas Lee:
          Partners HealthCare Applauds EHR Meaningful Use Regs (posted Friday, July 23)
–Humayun Chaudhry, Fed Of State Medical Boards:
          Federation Of State Medical Boards: Maintenance of Licensure and Health IT
–Kevin Weiss and Sheldon Horowitz, ABMS:
          American Board of Med. Specialties: Aligning Maintenance Of Certification and Meaningful Use