Blumenthal Letter #14: Beacon Communities Lead the Charge to Improve Health Outcomes

Establishing Beacons for Nationwide Advances in Health IT
Emailed May 5, 2010 

Dr. David Blumenthal

Dr. David Blumenthal

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal,
National Coordinator for Health IT
 
 

Healthcare professionals appreciate opportunities to learn from innovative colleagues and communities – to see what really works, to get “boots-on-the-ground” perspectives, to learn best practices, and to use the experience of other leaders to inform how to improve performance more broadly.    

The Beacon Community Cooperative Agreement Program, by its very design, was intended to shine a spotlight on health information technology (health IT) innovators, so that we all might learn from them. Today, Secretary Sebelius awarded $220 million to establish 15 Beacon Communities throughout America. These community consortia – selected from 130 applicants – have demonstrated leadership in developing advanced health IT solutions to help improve specific health outcomes. They also share a strong conviction in the benefits of health IT as a critical pillar to advance broad and sustainable health system improvement. The average award amount is $15 million over 36 months.    

The Beacon Community awards recognize collaborative community efforts operating at the cutting edge of health IT and health care delivery system innovation. Beacon Communities will implement a range of care delivery innovations building on existing infrastructure of interoperable health IT and standards-based information exchange, in coordination with the Regional Extension Center Program and State Health Information Exchange Program.  

In addition, the program will help Beacon Communities plan and develop new initiatives that can ensure the longer-term sustainability of health IT-enabled improvements in health care quality, safety, efficiency, and population health. This includes preparing for future policy changes resulting from enactment of health care reform legislation that will permit providers, states, and regional health care organizations to test new payment methods emphasizing improvements in quality and value.  

Like so many other providers who effectively implement health IT, Beacon Communities will leverage other existing federal programs and resources to promote health information exchange at the community level. These resources include:  

  • Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record (VLER)  program, which aims to develop a longitudinal electronic health record for all active duty, Guard and Reserve, retired military personnel, and eligible separated Veterans
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) programs at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and Health Center Controlled Networks (HCCNs) to advance the adoption of certified electronic health records and exchange of health information
  • Department of Agriculture and Department of Commerce efforts to extend broadband infrastructure

The partnership with applicable VLER, FQHC, and HCCN sites is particularly important to ensure we realize measurable and tangible results in federally funded, military, and private sector health care settings alike.
 
I am particularly pleased by the diversity among Beacon awardees:  geographically, they span the continental United States and reach as far as Hawaii; both urban and rural communities are well represented; and targeted program outcomes span some of America’s most pressing health concerns, from reducing medication errors and improving the care of individuals with cardiovascular disease to reducing disparities in access and outcomes for patients with diabetes. Additionally, the programs bring health IT innovation to a variety of underserved populations to address health disparities and improve patient care. The Beacon Communities demonstrate that health IT can bring meaningful change to health care for all Americans — not just the healthiest, wealthiest, or best insured.  

I extend my sincere congratulations to our 15 Beacon Communities. Your work inspires me, and I believe that in the coming months, it will inspire and inform America’s medical and health IT communities.  

Sincerely,
David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services  

“The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) encourages you to share this information as we work together to enhance the quality, safety and value of care and the health of all Americans through the use of electronic health records and health information technology.”
#          #         #
See post on e-Healthcare Marketing with full statement from White House listing recipients and the focus of the award for each.

Health IT Listening Session Apr 6 Agenda Set: Strategic Framework

Listening Agenda set for Health IT Strategic Framework Session
HIT Policy Committee Strategic Plan Workgroup
Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Per Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT, “The objective of the listening session is to obtain feedback from the healthcare community regarding the Health IT Strategic Framework which will become foundation for the updates to the Federal Health IT Strategic Plan. The Health IT Strategic Plan will focus on 2011 through 2015 time period as well as lay the ground work for the period beyond 2015 to create a learning health system through the effective use of HIT.”

Presentation [PPT - 1.60 MB]

AGENDA (pdf version)
12:00 Welcome
     –Jodi Daniel, JD, MPH, Co-Chair, Strategic Plan Workgroup
12:10 Overview of the Health IT Strategic Framework Paper: Development & Vision
     –Paul Tang, MD, Vice Chair, HIT Policy Committee, Chair, Strategic Plan Workgroup
12:25 Learning Health System
     –Presenter / Moderator: Patricia Brennan – 10 min
     –Public Comments – 25 min
1:00 Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology
     –Presenter / Moderator : Paul Tang – 10 min
     –Public Comments – 25 min
1:35 Policy and Technical Infrastructure
     –Presenter / Moderator: Paul Egerman – 10 min
     –Public Comments – 25 min
2:10 Privacy and Security
     –Presenter / Moderator: Deven McGraw – 10 min
     –Public Comments – 25 min
2:45 Open Discussion, Closing Remarks & Next Steps
     –Paul Tang

Registration required:
Visit http://events.signup4.com/hitstrategic to register to attend the session.  Meeting materials will be posted at http://healthit.hhs.gov/StrategicPlanWG as they become available.

For more details about strategic framework, please see earlier post on e-Heathcare Marketing.

ONC names managers for ‘Beacon’ grants program

ONC names managers for ‘Beacon’ grants program
Mary Mosquera of Government HealthIT News reported on March 23, 2010, that “ONC named Aaron McKethan, a research director at the Brookings Institution’s Engelberg Center for Health Reform as the Beacon program director.”

“Craig Brammer, a project director at Cincinnati’s Aligning Forces for Quality, an initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, was named deputy director,” and will report to McKethan.

Which Medical Dictionary? Vocabulary Task Force Meets March 23

Vocabulary Task Force Meeting
Clinical Operations Workgroup of  HIT Standards Committee
March 23, 2010

9:00am to 4:30pm EDT   Webconference/Audio (see access below)
Meeting focuses on Best Practices and lessons learned from stakeholders in vocabulary infratructure as well as governance values for various vocabularies.

Questions for Vocabulary Owners/Custodians
1. What vocabulary subset or value set creation and distribution services do you provide?
2. Who uses your services and what is the level of use?
3. What, if any, additional services and capabilities are in active development?
4. If applicable, what process is used to establish and revise any subsets or value sets that you distribute?
5. Based on your experience, what advice would you offer regarding best practices and pitfalls to avoid?

Questions for those involved in Governance Value Sets
1. Who should determine which value sets are needed?
2. Who should produce the value sets?
3. Who should review and approve value sets?
4. How should value sets be described, i.e., what is the minimum set of metadata needed?
5. In what format(s) and via what mechanism should value sets be distributed?
6. How and how frequently should value sets be updated, and how should updates be coordinated?
7. What support services would promote and facilitate their use?
8. What best practices/lessons learned have you learned, or what problems have you learned to avoid, regarding value set creation, maintenance, dissemination, and support services?
9. Do you have other advice or comments on value sets and their relationship to meaningful use?
10. What must the federal government do or not do with regard to the above, and/or what role should the federal government play?
11. Some have expressed concerns about intellectual property with respect to the specific value sets (i.e., the effort and expertise required to create them), and regarding the specific codes used (i.e., value sets developer from proprietary code sets). How do you envision sharing value sets while accounting for these intellectual property issues?

  • Agenda [PDF - 415 KB]
  • Welcome, Purpose of the Meeting
              – Jamie Ferguson, Chair
  • Summary & Key Points from February Hearing
            – Jamie Ferguson, Chair
            – Betsy Humphreys, Co-Chair
  • Panel 1: Office of the National Coordinator, Interoperability Framework
    • Douglas Fridsma, MD
  • Panel 2:  Federal Provider Organizations
  • Panel 3:  Best Practices & Lessons Learned: Vocabulary Infrastructure
  • Panel 4:  Best Practices & Lessons Learned, con’t
  • Panel 5:  Level 1 Governance Value Set
    • Sharon Sprenger, The Joint Commission [PDF - 229 KB]
      “While The Joint Commission has its roots in hospital accreditation, over the years it has developed evaluation programs for a diverse array of health care settings. Today, The Joint Commission evaluates and accredits more than 17,000 health care organizations and programs in the United States, including ambulatory care, behavioral health services, durable medical equipment providers and suppliers, home care, hospices, hospitals and critical access hospitals, laboratories and long term care facilities.” –From Joint Commission Statement
    • Karen Kmetik, American Medical Association
    • Greg Pawlson, National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) [invited]
    • Janet Corrigan, National Quality Forum (NQF)

    You may participate
    Webconference
    Audio:
    You may listen in via computer or telephone.
    US toll free:   1-877-705-2976
    International Direct:  1-201-689-8798

    HIT Policy and Standards Committees’ Recommendations for CMS Incentive Programs, ONC Implementation, Certification

    HIT Policy Committee Recommendations — March 2010
    “The HIT Policy Committee has made recommendations to the National Coordinator on (1) the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding CMS’ incentive program for the meaningful use of EHRs; and (2) the Interim Final Rule (IFR) on Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for EHRs. The recommendations, from the Meaningful Use, Certification/Adoption, Privacy & Security Policy, and Information Exchange Workgroups, were approved by the HIT Policy Committee at its February 2010 meeting. The HIT Policy Committee recommendations have been transmitted to the National Coordinator and to CMS.”

    HIT Standards Committee Recommendations–March 2010
    “The HIT Standards Committee has made recommendations to the National Coordinator on (1) the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding CMS’ incentive program for the meaningful use of EHRs; and (2) the Interim Final Rule (IFR) on Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for EHRs. The recommendations, from the Clinical Operations, Clinical Quality, and Privacy & Security Workgroups, were approved by the HIT Standards Committee at its February 2010 meeting. The HIT Standards Committee recommendations have been transmitted to the National Coordinator.”

    Certification Programs for HIT Webinar on Rulemaking NPRM Mar 25, 4pm EDT

    Certification Programs for Health IT Webinar
    Focus on Proposed Rulemaking NPRM

    March 25, 2010 4:00 – 5:00 p.m. EDT
    Sent via email on March 19, 2010
    On March 25, 2010 from 4:00 – 5:00 p.m. EDT, The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), will present a webinar on the recently released Certification Programs for HIT Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).  Public comments on the NPRM are now being accepted.  The temporary certification program’s comment period ends April 9 and the permanent certification program’s comment period ends May 10.  Because this NPRM is currently in the comment period phase, this webinar will be solely informational and seeks to help listeners better understand the proposals included in the NPRM.  

    Background
    Eligible professionals and eligible hospitals who seek to qualify for incentive payments under the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs are required by statute to use Certified EHR Technology.  This webinar will discuss the proposals included in the NPRM that would enable eligible professionals and eligible hospitals to adopt health IT that meets the definition of Certified EHR Technology.   

    Learn more about the NPRM at http://healthit.hhs.gov/CertificationNPRM

    To Participate
    There is limited space on this webinar. For those unable to join, there will be a transcript posted to the ONC website, http://healthit.hhs.gov, by March 29, 2010.

    Join the meeting

    Audio Information
    Dial-In: 1-888-673-9805
    Participant Passcode: 9033671

    First Time Users:
    To save time before the meeting, check your system to make sure it is ready to use Microsoft Office Live Meeting.

    Troubleshooting
    Unable to join the meeting? Follow these steps:

    1. Copy this address and paste it into your web browser:
    2. Copy and paste the required information:
      • Meeting ID: 9CS6RH
      • Entry Code: 5z}BQR5

    If you still cannot enter the meeting, contact support
    # # #

    ONC Web site on Certification Programs NPRM
    Certification NPRM | [PDF - 463 KB]
    Submit a comment on the certification NPRM
    Facts-at-a-Glance
    Frequently Asked Questions
    ONC HIMSS Town Hall (3/2/2010) Slides [PDF - 1.31 MB]
    Certification NPRM Webinar

    Implementation Workgroup, Starter Kits – Mar 8, 2010

    Implementation Workgroup – Mar 8, 2010
    Implementation Starter Kits
    HIT Standards Committee
    Monday, March 8, 2010
    9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. [Eastern]
    Washington, DC

    Note from Meeting site: “A blog on “Implementation Starter Kits” is available on the FACA blog for you to tell us about the opportunties and challenges you faced in adopting health IT. Any information you can give us will be helpful for this public meeting.”

    A G E N D A (pdf version)
    9:00 a.m. Call to Order/Roll Call – Judy Sparrow, ONC
    9:05 a.m. Welcome and Introduction
    Aneesh Chopra, Chair, Implementation Workgroup
    “Implementation Starter Kit: Lessons & Resources to Accelerate Adoption”
    9:15 a.m. Public Sector Panel
    Moderator: Aneesh Chopra, HIT Standards Committee member
    –Doug Fridsma, NHIN, Office of the National Coordinator, HHS
    –Hunt Blair, Deputy Director, Health Care Reform, Office of Vermont Health Access
    –Jessica Kahn, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS
    –Kim Davis-Allen, Alabama Medicaid
    –Ken Buetow, National Cancer Institute, HHS
    –Kathleen M. Roberts, National Institute of Standards and Technology
    10:30 a.m. Implementation Experiences Panel
    Moderator: Liz Johnson, HIT Standards Committee member
    –David Muntz, Baylor
    –Jay Colfer, Eclipsys (Baylor vendor)
    –Charles Christian, Good Samaritan
    –Michelle Freed, McKesson (Good Samaritan)
    –Mitzi Cardenas, Truman Medical
    –Mike Valentine, Cerner (Truman Medical)
    –Michael Sauk, University of Wisconsin
    –Sumit Rana, Epic (University of Wisconsin)
    12:00 p.m. LUNCH BREAK
    1:00 p.m. Implementation Experiences Panel, con’t
    Moderator: Judy Murphy, HIT Standards Committee member
    –Amanda Parsons, New York City Primary Care Information Project (NYC PCIP)
    –Sidd Shah, eClinical Works (NYC PCIP)
    –Dick Thompson, Quality Health Network
    –Ray Scott, Axolotl (Quality Health Network)
    –John Blair, Taconic, IPA
    –Jennifer Brull, Solo Family Physician, Plainville, KS
    –Maria Rudolph, eMDs (Dr. Brull’s vendor)
    2:15 p.m. Innovation Panel
    Moderator: Cris Ross, HIT Standards Committee member
    –David Stuart Buck, Healthcare for the Homeless – Houston & Baylor College of Medicine
    –Harry Totonis or David Yakimischak, SureScripts
    –Tom Morrison, NaviNet
    –Sherry Reynolds, Group Health
    –Will Ross, Redwood MedNet
    3:30 p.m. Meeting Summary – Aneesh Chopra, Chair
    3:45 p.m. Public Comment
    4:00 p.m. Adjourn

    How to Participate Remotely
    Webconference: Go to link at least 10 minutes prior to meeting; test system prior to meeting.
    Audio: You may listen in via computer or telephone.
    US toll free:   1-877-705-2976
    International Direct:  1-201-689-8798

    Health IT Policy Committee Meeting: Feb 17, 2010

    HIT Policy Committee Meeting: February 17, 2010
    Recommendations on CMS and ONC Rules
    Agenda, Documents, How to Participate Remotely

    Health IT Policy Committee meeting on Feb 17, 2010 focuses on recommendations to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on the Notice for Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) about EHR incentives and to Office of National Coordinator for Health IT on the Interim Final Rule (IFR) on Certification Criteria.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m./Eastern
    Location:  Washington, DC

    Agenda [PDF - 393 KB]
    10:00 a.m.
    CALL TO ORDER – Judy Sparrow, ONC for Health IT
    10:05 a.m. Opening Remarks – David Blumenthal, MD, MPP, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
    10:15 a.m. Review of the Agenda – Paul Tang, Vice Chair of the Committee
    10:20 a.m. Meaningful Use Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
    - Paul Tang, Chair
    - George Hripcsak, Co-Chair
    11:30 a.m. Adoption/Certification Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the NPRM and the Interim Final Rule (IFR) on Certification Criteria
    - Paul Egerman, Co-Chair
    - Marc Probst, Co-Chair
    12:00 p.m. LUNCH BREAK
    12:45 p.m. Information Exchange Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on Health Information Exchange in the NPRM
    - Deven McGraw, Chair
    - Micky Tripathi, Co-Chair
    1:30 p.m. Privacy & Security Policy Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the Privacy & Security Objective in the NPRM
    - Deven McGraw, Chair
    - Rachel Block, Co-Chair
    2:30 p.m. NHIN Workgroup Recommendations
    - David Lansky, Chair, NHIN Workgroup
    - Daniel Weitzner, Co-Chair, NHIN Workgroup
    - Farzad Mostashari, Office of the National Coordinator
    3:15 p.m. Update: Strategic Plan Workgroup
    - Paul Tang, Chair, Strategic Plan Workgroup
    - Jodi Daniel, Co-Chair
    3:45 p.m. Public Comment
    4:00 p.m. Adjourn

    Documents
    Meaningful Use Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the NPRM [PPT - 1.22 MB]
    NPRM Recommendations [PDF - 488 KB]
    Adoption/Certification Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the NPRM and IFR on Certification Criteria [PPT - 1.15 MB]
    Information Exchange Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on Health Information Exchange in the NPRM [PPT - 229 KB]
    Privacy & Security Policy Workgroup: Comments & Discussion on the Privacy & Security Objective in the NPRM [PPT - 216 KB]
    NHIN Workgroup Recommendations [PPT - 1.14 MB]

    How to Participate Remotely
    Webconference: Go to link at least 10 minutes prior to meeting; test system prior to meeting.
    Audio: You may listen in via computer or telephone.
    US toll free:   1-877-705-6006
    International Direct:  1-201-689-8557
    Confirmation Code: HIT Committee Meeting

    Chopra Invites Feedback on Opportunities, Challenges facing HIT Implementation: FACA Blog

    Aneesh Chopra Invites You to Tell Us About Opportunities and Challenges facing HIT Implementation: Federal Advisory Committee Blog
    On Feb 12, 2010 post on FACA Blog, US CTO and Implementation Workgroup Chair Aneesh Chopra invited feedback and HIT success stories in preparation for ”March 8th, the Implementation Workgroup of the Health IT Standards Committee (which) will hold a public hearing on ‘Implementation Starter Kit: Lessons and Resources to Accelerate Adoption’ to help providers achieve meaningful use by, in part, surfacing examples of effective meaningful use implementation preparation.”

    Chopra continues “Although any comment or question is welcome, we are particularly interested in questions or comments about the four categories of standards:

    1. Vocabulary Standards (i.e., standardized nomenclatures and code sets used to describe clinical problems and procedures, medications, labs and allergies);
    2. Content Exchange Standards (i.e., standards used to share clinical information such as clinical summaries, prescriptions, and structured electronic documents);
    3. Transport Standards (i.e., standards used to establish a common, predictable, secure communication protocol between systems); and
    4. Privacy and Security Standards (e.g., authentication, access control, transmission security) which relate to and span across all of the other types of standards. “

    While feedback on the blog is “not a substitute for official feedback on the regulations” due March 15, 2010, it will help guide the Implementation meeting.

    CMS & ONC Issue Meaningful Use Definition and EHR Standards for Incentives

    CMS and ONC Issue Regulations Proposing a Definition of ‘Meaningful Use’ and Setting Standards for Electronic Health Record Incentive Program
    Press Release Distributed via eMail
    DATE: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 
    FOR RELEASE: Immediately                 

    Public Encouraged to Comment on New Regulations:
    60-Day Comment Period

    “The Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) encourage public comment on two regulations issued today that lay a foundation for improving quality, efficiency and safety through meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technology. The regulations will help implement the EHR incentive programs enacted under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act).

    “A proposed rule issued by CMS outlines proposed provisions governing the EHR incentive programs, including defining the central concept of ‘meaningful use’ of EHR technology. An interim final regulation (IFR) issued by ONC sets initial standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for EHR technology.  Both regulations are open to public comment.

    “‘Widespread adoption of electronic health records holds great promise for improving health care quality, efficiency, and patient safety,’ said, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.  ‘The Recovery Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help providers adopt and make meaningful use of EHR technology so they can give better care and their patients’ experience of care will improve. Over time, we believe the EHR incentive program under Medicare and Medicaid will accelerate and facilitate health information technology adoption by more individual providers and organizations throughout the health care system.’

    “‘These regulations are closely linked,’ said Charlene Frizzera, CMS acting administrator.  ‘CMS’s proposed regulation would define and specify how to demonstrate ‘meaningful use’ of EHR technology, which is a prerequisite for receiving the Medicare incentive payments.  Our rule also outlines the proposed payment methodologies for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs.  ONC’s regulation sets forth the standards and specifications that will enhance the interoperability, functionality, utility and security of health information technology.’

    “CMS and ONC worked closely to develop the two rules and received input from hundreds of technical subject matters experts, health care providers, and other key stakeholders.  Numerous public meetings to solicit public comment were held by three Federal advisory committees: the National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS), the Health IT Policy Committee (HITPC), and the Health IT Standards Committee (HITSC).  HITSC presented its final recommendations to the National Coordinator in August 2009.  These recommendations, along with all other input were considered to help inform the development of the regulations announced today.

    “The IFR issued by ONC describes the standards that must be met by certified EHR technology to exchange healthcare information among providers and between providers and patients. This initial set of standards begins to define a common language to ensure accurate and secure health information exchange across different EHR systems.  The IFR describes standard formats for clinical summaries and prescriptions; standard terms to describe clinical problems, procedures, laboratory tests, medications and allergies; and standards for the secure transportation of this information using the Internet.

    “The IFR calls for the industry to standardize the way in which EHR information is exchanged between organizations, and sets forth criteria required for an EHR technology to be certified. These standards will support meaningful use and data exchange among providers who must use certified EHR technology to qualify for the Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

    “Under the statute, HHS is required to adopt an initial set of standards for EHR technology by Dec. 31, 2009.  The IFR will go into effect 30 days after publication, with an opportunity for public comment and refinement over the next 60 days.  A final rule will be issued in 2010.

    “‘We strongly encourage stakeholders to provide comments on these standards and specifications,’ Dr. Blumenthal said.

    “The Recovery Act established programs to provide incentive payments to eligible professionals and eligible hospitals participating in Medicare and Medicaid that adopt and make “meaningful use” of certified EHR technology.  Incentive payments may begin as soon as October 2010 to eligible hospitals.  Incentive payments to other eligible providers may begin in January 2011.

    “The proposed rule would define the term ‘meaningful EHR user’ as an eligible professional or eligible hospital that, during the specified reporting period, demonstrates meaningful use of certified EHR technology in a form and manner consistent with certain objectives and measures presented in the regulation.  These objectives and measures would include use of certified EHR technology in a manner that improves quality, safety, and efficiency of health care delivery, reduces health care disparities, engages patients and families, improves care coordination, improves population and public health, and ensures adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information. 

    “The proposed rule would define meaningful use for the Medicare EHR incentive programs.  It proposes one definition that would apply to eligible professionals participating in the Medicare fee-for-service and the Medicare Advantage EHR incentive programs as well as a proposed definition that would apply to eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals.  These definitions also would serve as the minimum standard for eligible professionals and eligible hospitals participating in the Medicaid EHR incentive program.  The rule proposes that states could request CMS approval to implement additional meaningful use measures, as appropriate, but could not request approval of fewer or less rigorous meaningful use measures than required by the rule.

    “This rule proposes a phased approach to implement the proposed requirements for demonstrating meaningful use.  This approach would initially establish reasonable criteria for meaningful use based on currently available technological capabilities and providers’ practice experience.  CMS will establish stricter and more extensive criteria for demonstrating meaningful use over time, as anticipated developments in technology and providers’ capabilities occur.

    “CMS provides a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule.  ‘The definition and requirements for demonstrating meaningful use of EHR technology are proposals. CMS welcomes and will give serious consideration to comments that improve our proposal while achieving the goals Congress established for the EHR incentive programs,’ Frizzera said.

    “The CMS proposed rule and fact sheets, may be viewed at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Recovery/11_HealthIT.asp

    “ONC’s interim final rule may be viewed at http://healthit.hhs.gov/standardsandcertification. In early 2010 ONC intends to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking related to the certification of health information technology.”
    # # #

    Additional excerpts from ONC and CMS Web sites:
    CMS Proposed Rule: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program (pdf) 

    ONC Interim Final Rule: Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology (pdf)

    Facts At A Glance: Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology

    Standards & Certification Interim Final Rule: 
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Please note:
    Questions are organized by category. These pages are updated frequently, so please check back with the ONC site often.

    Question Categories:
    A. Background/General
    B. Timeframe & Comments
    C. Standards & Certification Criteria
    D. Related Rules

    Related CMS Links
    Press Release: CMS and ONC Issue Regulations Proposing A Definition Of “Meaningful Use” and Setting Standards for Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

    Fact Sheet: Proposed Requirements for EHR Medicaid Incentive Program

    Fact Sheet: Proposed Requirements for EHR Medicare Incentive Program

    Sheet: Proposed Definition of Meaningful Use

    Health IT Frequently Asked Questions

    Blumenthal’s Updates — Dec 30, 2009
    For Nat’l Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal’s Letter #8 to Public and Link to his Health IT Buzz post “A Defining Moment for Meaningful Use,” see e-Healthcare Marketing post.

    Reporting on Information Releases from ONC and CMS
    See HISTalk blog’s Dec 30, 2009 post “ONCHIT Releases Preliminary Definition of Meaningful Use” for summary of proposed and interim rules.
    Mary Mosquera’s Dec 30, 2009 story in Government HealthIT, carried my favorite headline “The wait is over: HHS unveil’s ‘meaningful use’ plan” as well as a comprehensive summary while avoiding a detailed rundown.
    Healthcare IT News delivered two articles on Dec 30, 2009:
              Bernie Moengain wrote: “CMS, ONC deliver meaningful use package”
              Jack Beaudoin wrote: Eligible Provider “Meaningful Use: Criteria”
    Joseph Goedert reported a brief summary Dec 30, 2009 in HealthData Management called “Feds Issue Meaningful Use, Certification Rules.”