New ONC-Sponsored Research Advances Health Information Exchange

New ONC-Sponsored Research Advances Health Information Exchange

Health information exchange (HIE) is not easy. ONC has sponsored expert research on various technical and business-related health information exchange topics, because we know that professionals engaged in implementing health information exchange must possess business acumen and technical expertise, on top of policy savvy and many other competencies. Without these skills there are many ways to overreach, or just as perilously, under reach, resulting in failure to maximize the long-term value of services offered through health information exchange.

The ONC-sponsored research will provide health information exchange implementers, policymakers, and researchers with a heightened understanding of several high-impact services that can support the sustainability of health information exchange organizations.

We would like to announce that five new health information exchange research reports are now available on HealthIT.gov. Each provides:

  • Background information on core concepts
  • Analyses of key challenges and opportunities
  • Rich appendices, including up-to-date case studies
  • Health information exchange vendor descriptions

To execute this work, ONC contracted with Audacious Inquiry External Links Disclaimer, a health information technology services company. These reports will support the State HIE Program’s grantees as they continue to implement health information exchange, which increasingly includes launching query-based exchanges.

Listed below are the five new HIE reports that are available:

1. REPORT: Query-based Exchange: Key factors influencing success & failure of health information exchange

Perhaps the broadest of the reports, Query-Based Exchange: Key Factors Influencing Success and Failure provides essentially a “how-to” guide for navigating the major business considerations facing an HIE, including a breakdown of what the authors consider to be the determinants of HIE success. These are:

  • Data provider distribution
  • Data diversity/data saturation
  • Breadth/relevance of the user-base
  • Utilization rates

The report states that:

“…arriving at the true tipping point for query services that will make a Health Information Organization a clinical necessity is dependent on reaching certain milestones against [these] four interrelated metrics.”

REPORT FINDING: The Number of Patient Record Queries Indicate Success of HIEs

One of the most revealing aspects of this report is a chart contrasting six successful HIEs with two shuttered organizations across nearly 24 data points. One of these data points is the average number of patient record queries per month that each entity is receiving or had received. Those HIEs that are considered successful have figures ranging from 1,548 to 333,333 per month, while the closed HIEs had between 167 and 250 queries per month.

REPORT FINDING: There are Leadership Challenges for Health Information Exchange Vendors

The report also considers specific lessons from the experience of these health information organizations. It details the challenges of hiring and retaining a chief executive who is responsible for strategic vision, sales, marketing, day-to-day operations, and complex technical implementation projects. The research found that on top of all this, the leader might only receive a modest salary relative to her private sector counterparts.

2. REPORT: Health Information Exchange-Driven Notification & Subscription Services.

While health information exchange is not easy, it need not be overly complex. One theme that runs throughout the research is that basic tools can be used to support sophisticated use cases.

The report on HIE-Driven Notification & Subscription Services provides a review of the technical considerations involved in enabling push messages to providers. While these messages are a relatively simple technology, they can be used to support the advanced care coordination requirements of new payment models such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Accountable Care Organizations. The report uses, as an example, the Indiana Health Information Exchange (IHIE)’s ability to send hospital admission alerts and discharge summaries to primary care providers. Such tools will be essential as hospitals begin to face negative financial incentives for readmissions, such as through CMS’ Readmissions Reduction Program.

The report also touches on how IHIE is developing a pilot that will allow managed care organization case managers, as part of their care coordination efforts, to receive notifications when their members are admitted to a hospital or visit an emergency department.

3. REPORT: Provider Directory Solutions for Health Information Exchanges and Beyond

Another important aspect of health information exchange is provider directories. While they are not glamorous, they are ubiquitous, and they can be highly valuable. On the most basic level, a provider directory is a type of electronic white pages that allows one provider to look up contact information for another provider.

The report on Provider Directory Solutions covers the key concepts associated with the technology. However, it also describes several additional use cases, such as how they can be used for future health benefits exchanges or for state licensing boards. Yet, the report goes even further by supporting the idea that the profit potential of provider directories is likely to go beyond the fundamental requirements of clinical health information exchange. Such considerations are critical for the State HIE Program’s cooperative agreement partners as they seek strategies to attain sustainability beyond the grant period.

4. REPORT: Master Data Management within Health Information Exchange Infrastructures

The report on Master Data Management within HIE Infrastructures explores the technical aspects of the tools that can help HIEs accurately capture and coordinate a patient’s identity. In short, master data management is how two pieces of electronic health information are appropriately merged or kept separate, which is particularly challenging when there are varying levels of data quality on patient identities.

The report also considers how master data management tools can be employed for advanced uses, such as data analytics associated with new payment models or patient centered medical homes.

5. REPORT: Consumer Engagement in Health Information Exchange

The report, Consumer Engagement in Health Information Exchange, provides a solid primer on the challenges and technical aspects of consumer-mediated exchange. This includes the considerations related to identity proofing, identity authentication, and access. The report also presents short case studies on several well-known entities working in this space, including:

For More Information

This work was overseen by the State HIE Policy Office, which is part of the State HIE Cooperative Agreement Program. ONC plans to release additional reports in the future.

For more information, contact ONC Program Analyst John Rancourt or ONC Program Manager Lee Stevens.

HIE Hearings by ONC Advisory Committees Jan 29, 2013

AGENDA

Health Information Exchange Hearing
HIT Policy Committee and HIT Standards Committee
Tuesday, January 29, 2013 9:00am – 5:00pm/Eastern Time
The Dupont Circle Hotel
1500 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington DC, 20036

9:00 a.m.         Call to Order/Roll Call MacKenzie Robertson, ONC
9:05 a.m.         Opening Remarks
                          Farzad Mostashari, National Coordinator

9:15 a.m.         The State of Health Information Exchange
                          Micky Tripathi, Chair, IEWG HITPC

9:45 a.m.         Panel 1: Health Information Exchange Enabling Healthcare Transformation

Moderator: John Halamka

  • Michael Lee, Atrius Health
  • Sandy Selzer, Camden Coalition
  • Keith Hepp, HealthBridge
  • John Blair, Hudson Valley Initiative
  • Karen VanWagner, Plus ACO/North Texas Specialty Physicians

11:00 a.m.       Break

11: 15 a.m.      Panel 2: Technical and Business Barriers and Opportunities

Moderator: Paul Tang

  • John Halamka, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • David Horrocks, CRISP
  • Bill Spooner, Sharp
  • Tone Southerland, Greenway

12:45 p.m.      Lunch

1:30 p.m.        Panel 3: Governance Barriers and Opportunities

Moderator: John Halamka

  • David Kibbe, Direct Trust
  • Christopher Alban, Epic
  • Sid Thornton, Care Connectivity Consortium
  • Michael Matthews, Healtheway

2:45 p.m.        Break

3:00 p.m.        Panel 4: Consumer-Mediated Exchange

Moderator: Paul Tang

  • Jeff Donnell, NoMoreClipboard
  • Mary Anne Sterling, Sterling Health
  • Neal Patterson, Cerner
  • Alan Blaustein, Care Planners

4:15 p.m.        Committee Discussion and Next Steps

  • Paul Tang, Vice Chair HITPC

4:45 p.m.        Public Comment

5:00 p.m.        Adjourn

Meeting Agenda: 

Mostishari: “reforms require electronic health records to carry out.”

Mostishari rebuts RAND EHR study in 178 words in NY Times:
"reforms require electronic health records to carry out." http://goo.gl/FpYMR
New York Times Letter to the Editor on January 23, 2013 from National Health IT Coordinator Farzad Mostishare:
In 2nd Look, Few Savings From Digital Care Records” (Business Day, Jan. 11) reports on the recent RAND study’s findings that the use of electronic health records has not yet reached its potential."
See http://goo.gl/FpYMR
Original times story: www.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/business/electronic-records-systems-have-not-reduced-health-costs-report-says.html"
Report based on RAND Study "What It Will Take to Achieve the As-Yet-Unfulfilled Promises of Health Information Technology" by Arthur L. Kellermann and Spencer S. Jones, as published in Health Affairs January 2013 issue: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/32/1/63.abstract?etoc

 

Electronic Health Records Infographic from ONC

How do electronic health records (EHRs) connect you and your doctor?
Infographic accessed from www.healthit.gov on 12/12/2012.

"In the past, medical data was only stored on paper, making it difficult for your health care providers to share your information. Between 2001 and 2011, the number of doctors using an EHRsystem grew about 57%, making it easier for you and all of your doctors to coordinate your care, and often reducing the chance of medical errors. Where are electronic health records headed? In this Infographic, view the history of electronic health records and see how they may improve your health and health care in the future."

ONC provided an easy way for you to share this HealthIT infographic. Copy and paste this code to your company website or blog:
<iframe src="http://www.healthit.gov/embed/" width="500" height="1970" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:0; height:1970px; overflow:hidden; width:500px;"></iframe>
 

ONC Activities Support Governance of Nationwide Health Information Exchange

Mostishari Outlines ONC Steps to Improve HIE Governance
Originally posted on ONC Buzz Blog Post on December 20, 2012 by Dr. Farzad Mostashari, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
Reposted on e-HealthcareMarketing.com on December 22, 2012.

Earlier this year, ONC issued a request for information regarding a potentialphoto of dr. farzad mostashari governance mechanism for the nationwide health information network.  Based on the comments and feedback we received from multiple stakeholders, ONC announced in September that we would not be issuing federal regulations. Instead, we committed to launch a range of activities to support existing governance initiatives and advance governance goals of nationwide health information exchange: increase interoperability, decrease the cost and complexity of exchange, and increase trust among participants to mobilize trusted exchange to support patient care. 

Below, are some of the activities ONC is undertaking to promote emerging good governing practices within and across communities.

  • Today, we are issuing a new Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA). The FOA will allow ONC to work collaboratively with entities already involved in governance of health information exchange to encourage the continued development and adoption of policies, interoperability requirements, and business practices that will increase the ease of electronic health information exchange, reduce implementation costs, and assure the privacy and security of data being exchanged.
  • In January, ONC will host an open listening session on governance of health information exchange, to provide opportunities for a wide range of stakeholders to describe their issues, priorities, and critical concerns.
  • Building upon this input from stakeholders, the HIT Policy Committee and HIT Standards Committee will hold a public hearing on January 29, 2013, to further discuss the current state of health information exchange.  The hearing will highlight the significant amount of exchange activity that is occurring today and the practices that enabled or impeded it; the health information exchange opportunities and needs of providers as they take on new payment models; the nature and scope of governance policies and practices of entities currently providing governance to different types of exchange communities, the impact of governance on information exchange, and the opportunities to strengthen governance at multiple levels.
  • In the first quarter of 2013, the National e-health Collaborative, through our cooperative agreement, will convene key stakeholder governance entities.  These entities, whose decisions establish policies and practices for a given community of exchange partners, will work throughout the coming year to identify key issues and common problems in the governance of health information exchange and the best ways to address them.
  • ONC plans to publish a series of governance guidelines for effective and trusted electronic health information exchange.  Through this effort, ONC hopes to guide emerging governance models on the policies and practices that should be considered as part of their approach to governance.
  • ONC will also launch a monitoring program to ensure the governance goals are being addressed.

ONC will be holding a technical assistance call on January 7, 2013, at 2:00 pm EST for applicants interested in applying for the FOA.

The overarching goal for ONC remains that the information follow the patient where and when it is needed, across organizational, vendor, and geographic boundaries.  We hope that you agree that we have initiated a robust series of activities to accomplish this goal.  We look forward to your input as we move forward.  It will take all of us to be successful.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Exemplar Health Information Exchange Governance Entities Program
Total of $800,000 in Funding
Excerpted from FOA issued on December 20, 2012
Executive Summary

The Exemplar Health Information Exchange Governance Entities Cooperative Agreement Program (Program) seeks to support a collaborative exchange within existing private or public sector organizations that have already established governance of health information exchange.  The purpose of the Program is to work with existing governance entities to further develop and adopt policies, interoperability requirements, and business practice criteria that align with national priorities, overcome interoperability challenges, reduce implementation costs and assure the privacy and security of electronic exchange of health information.  By advancing and further developing existing health information exchange governance models, this Program promises to increase the level of secure electronic health information exchange in the nation.  Section 3011(a) of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) authorizes the Secretary to invest in the infrastructure necessary to allow for and promote the electronic exchange and use of health information for each individual in the United States consistent with the goals of the Federal Health Information Technology Strategic Plan: 2011-2015, and more specifically, support the nationwide electronic exchange and use of health information in a secure, private, and accurate manner. Total funding available for this initiative is $800,000.

I.       Funding Opportunity Description

A.        Background and Purpose

This funding opportunity announcement (FOA) will advance collaboration within private or public sector organizations that have already established governance of health information exchange.  The purpose of the Program is to work with existing governance entities to further develop and adopt policies, interoperability requirements, and business practice criteria that align with national priorities, overcome interoperability challenges, reduce implementation costs and assure the privacy and security of electronic exchange of health information, in a manner consistent with section 3011(a) of the PHSA.  As a cooperative agreement, as opposed to a grant, this award instrument of financial assistance ensures substantial involvement between the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and the recipients during the performance of the project.

ONC had previously considered proposing the establishment of a voluntary accreditation process for the governance of health information exchange through a rulemaking process. A Request for Information (RFI) solicited feedback on whether ONC should establish this voluntary program and on the specific rules of the road that exchange entities should follow. Several of the responses to the RFI pointed out that there are already organizations engaged in health information exchange governance activities, and that ONC should work with these entities rather than set up a new process and program. Based on these and many other comments received, ONC decided not to pursue a governance approach through rulemaking at this time.  Instead ONC is establishing a robust framework of leadership, guidance, engagement, listening and learning, and monitoring. 

  • We will identify and shine light on good practices that support robust, secure and interoperable exchange.
  • We will actively engage with entities currently serving in governance/oversight roles to promote emerging good governance practices. 
  • We will continue to use our existing authorities and convening powers to create consensus and provide guidance and tools to address specific barriers to interoperability and exchange. 
  • We will continue to evaluate how and what consumer protections can be appropriately applied to health information exchange through existing regulatory frameworks. 
  • We will continue to monitor and learn from the wide range of activities occurring. 

This FOA will enable ONC to work collaboratively through the cooperative agreement process with existing entities undertaking governance activities for the electronic exchange of health information to encourage them to develop and adopt scalable national policies, interoperability requirements and business practice requirements that reduce the cost and complexity of exchange, obviates the need for cumbersome legal agreements and reduces the cost and complexity of health information exchange, .  The FOA is focused on working with existing governance entities to expand their rules of the road (i.e. policies, interoperability requirements and business practice requirements) for participating organizations.  This work will support and advance the efforts of existing governance entities which will benefit consumers and providers by allowing health information to flow securely between unaffiliated healthcare organizations. 

The cooperative agreement will provide funding to selected governance organizations to collaborate with ONC to:

  • Develop and implement policies, interoperability requirements and business practice requirements that will facilitate directed “push” and/or query-based exchange[1] and address operational challenges that are slowing adoption and use of either model of exchange
  • Identify potential opportunities to incorporate these solutions in national policy through certification of electronic health records, nationally adopted standards, incorporation into federal policy or additional governance activities

B.        Project Structure and Scope of Services
1.         Approach

ONC will enter into cooperative agreements with up to four awardees whose primary role is providing governance for participants’ directed “push” and/or query-based exchange.  Applicants may address one or both of the exchange models.  ONC is interested in funding at least one applicant that will provide governance for each exchange model.  ONC will work with each awardee through the cooperative agreement process to determine the set of policies, interoperability requirements and business practice requirements that will be addressed under this cooperative agreement.  Once the Exemplar Health Information Exchange Governance Entities cooperative agreement(s) are awarded, ONC will encourage State HIE Cooperative Agreement grantees to participate in the Exemplar Health Information Exchange Governance Entities awardee activities, as appropriate.  Awardees will serve as key partners with ONC in demonstrating potential scalable national rules of the road for the electronic exchange of health information.

2.         General Funding Requirements

Applicants must:

  1. Have operational governance for the electronic exchange of health information. This means the applicant has established and implemented policies, interoperability requirements and business practice requirements for participants’ query-based exchange, directed “push” exchange or both. 
  2. Support the exchange of health information between unaffiliated healthcare organizations, health information organizations and across multiple vendors’ products. 
  3. Have broad representation of stakeholders (i.e. as relevant healthcare providers, health IT vendors, consumers, health information organizations, etc.) in decision-making bodies and processes.   
  4. Adhere to principles outlined in Section I.B.5, Principles

3.         National Priority Topics

ONC will work with awardees to develop and implement governance policies, interoperability requirements and business practice requirements addressing the national priority topics outlined below. Addressing these topics will support health information exchange in stages one and two of meaningful use and will facilitate implementation of innovative payment models.  In areas where ONC has existing recommendations from the HIT Policy Committee or the HIT Standards Committee that ONC has considered and decided to implement, or has Standards & Interoperability Framework activities, those will be used as the starting point to develop solutions.

  1. Directed “Push”  Exchange Model
    1. End user identity resolution and authentication
    2. Discovery and management of digital certificates
    3. Exchanging certificate trust bundles
    4. Querying provider directories
  2. Query-Based Exchange Model
    1. Improving patient matching for a patient record query
    2. Implementing meaningful patient choice to participate in HIE
    3. Determining a treatment relationship exists before a patient record query is executed
    4. Addressing liability concerns

Each applicant will work on national priority topics in their selected exchange model through this cooperative agreement and may also propose additional priority topics.  ONC will work with each awardee to determine the final set of topics each awardee will work on under this cooperative agreement.  If multiple awardees are working on the same or similar topics, ONC may instruct awardees to work together to establish a common solution.


[1] We define “directed push” exchange as a message sent from one participant to another, often to support anticipated and planned care. Examples include information that is sent by a hospital to another provider when a patient is referred or discharged from the hospital, lab results delivery or alerts to a primary care provider when a patient is seen in the emergency department. We define “query-based” exchange as models allowing providers to query for a patient’s health information, for instance when the patient arrives at an emergency department or at a specialist’s office without any clinical information.

Meaningful Use Stage 2: A Giant Leap in Data Exchange

Health IT Buzz Blog: Meaningful Use Stage 2: A Giant Leap in Data Exchange
Originally published on ONC's Health IT Buzz Blog on August 28, 2012 and republished on e-HealthcareMarketing.com
By Dr. Farzad Mostashari / National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

photo of dr. farzad mostashariThe CMS and ONC Meaningful Use Stage 2 rules we just issued represent a massive step forward in advancing the secure exchange of information between providers and patients to support better care across the nation. Getting the right information to the right person at the right time can be a matter of life and death.  Unfortunately, anyone who has been a patient or cared for a patient understands that it’s simply not happening today.

Back in 2009 when we were drafting the initial set of meaningful use criteria and required standards, our hopes and expectations were subdued by the reality we faced. Different vendor products used different proprietary or local codes, there were strong disagreements about how laboratory results or patient summaries should be packaged, and there was simply no consensus on how the Internet could be used to securely send patient information. Over the past two years, thanks to the initial steps we took in Stage 1 and the relentless work of almost 1,000 volunteers in ONC’s standards and implementation activities, we can now leap towards interoperability and exchange in Stage 2.

Meaningful Use Stage 2 and Health Information Exchange Highlights

  • Common Standards and Implementation Specifications for Electronic Exchange of Information: The Meaningful Use Stage 2 final rules define a common dataset for all summary of care records, including an impressive array of structured and coded data to be formatted uniformly and sent securely during transitions of care, upon discharge, and to be shared with the patient themselves. These include:
    • Patient name and demographic information including preferred language (ISO 639-2 alpha-3), sex, race/ethnicity (OMB Ethnicity) and date of birth
    • Vital signs including height, weight, blood pressure, and smoking status (SNOMED CT)
    • Encounter diagnosis (SNOMED CT or ICD-10-CM)
    • Procedures (SNOMED CT)
    • Medications (RxNorm) and medication allergies (RxNorm)
    • Laboratory test results (LOINC)
    • Immunizations (CVX)
    • Functional status including activities of daily living, cognitive and disability status
    • Care plan field including goals and instructions
    • Care team including primary care provider of record
    • Reason for referral and referring provider’s name and office contact information (for providers)
    • Discharge instructions (for hospitals)

In addition, there are a host of detailed standards and implementation specifications for a number of other transactions including quality reporting, laboratory results, electronic prescribing, immunizations, cancer registries, and syndromic surveillance (see below for a detailed list).

What does this mean? It means that we are able to break down barriers to the electronic exchange of information and decrease the cost and complexity of building interfaces between different systems while ensuring providers with certified electronic health record (EHR) technology have the tools in place to share, understand, and incorporate critical patient information. It also means that providers can improve workflow and dig deeper into the data. Certified EHR technology must be able to support identity reconciliation—matching the right record to the right person—and will give doctors the tools to reconcile a new document with the information already on file, for instance by incorporating medications and problems identified by another provider into a patient’s record,  thus creating a single source of truth. The Stage 2 regulations also require developers to build systems that allow each segment of the patient summary, whether it is  procedures or lab results, to be retrievable by the end user, getting us closer to the goal of being able to efficiently search and assemble individual data elements through metadata tags.

  • Rigorous Testing of Exchange for Stage 2: To ensure certified EHR technology supports providers in exchanging health information with greater frequency and across vendor boundaries, ONC will work with NIST to develop an interoperability testing platform for Stage 2 that will rigorously test that EHR technology can send, receive, and incorporate standardized data using the specified standards and protocols. Any EHR technology that meets the demanding testing requirements should be able to send and receive standardized information with other certified EHRs. We will need your help over the coming months to develop and vet the Stage 2 certification test scripts. Check back to www.healthit.gov soon for additional information on this initiative.
  • Actual Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information: By 2014, providers will have to demonstrate, and vendors will have to support, the actual exchange of structured care summaries with other providers—including across vendor boundaries—and with patients. Whether through “push” or “query” methods, the requirements in the rule assure exchange is occurring while avoiding undue burden on providers and vendors to track and measure this exchange. As we stated unequivocally in the final rule (a dramatic reading of which is available Exit Disclaimer), we will pay close attention to whether the requirements in the rule are sufficient to make vendor-to-vendor exchange attainable for providers. If there is not sufficient progress or we continue to see barriers that create data silos or “walled gardens Exit Disclaimer,” we will revisit our meaningful use approach and consider other options to achieve our policy intent.

While any rule-making includes some compromises between the aspirational goals we want to achieve and the reality of where the market is, we continue to make progress toward the ultimate goal of nationwide health information exchanges. By setting ambitious, but achievable targets for providers and vendors alike, I’m confident that we’ll see the same hockey stick progress we’ve seen for adoption of EHRs for information exchange. The push on standards-based information exchange and other Meaningful Use Stage 2 requirements will allow the country to make meaningful use of the meaningful use roadmap for more coordinated, safer, and better care.

For More Information

MU Stage 2 Chart
Meaningful Use Chart Stage 2Meaningful Use Stage 2 Chart
 

 

Meaningful Use Stage 2: CMS and ONC Release Final Rule for Meaningful Use and Certification

Meaningful Use Stage 2: CMS and ONC Release Final Rule for Meaningful Use and Certification
Excerpted from HealthIT.gov and CMS.gov on August 26, 2012

On August 23, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final rule which establishes Stage 2 of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs, updates Stage 1, and includes other program modifications. At the same time the Office of National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) released the 2014 Edition Standards and Certification Criteria (S&CC) final rule which completes ONC’s second full rulemaking cycle to adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for EHR technology.

The CMS  final rule specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAHs) must meet in order to continue to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. All providers must achieve meaningful use under the Stage 1 criteria before moving to Stage 2.

The 2014 Edition S&CC final rule reflects ONC’s commitment to reduce regulatory burden; promote patient safety and patient engagement; enhance EHR technology’s interoperability, electronic health information exchange capacity, public health reporting, and security; enable clinical quality measure data capture, calculation, and electronic submission to CMS or states; and introduce greater transparency and efficiency to the certification process.

CMS Final Rule

CMS Resources

ONC Final Rule

ONC Resources

Other Resources

Stage 2 Timeline
The earliest that the Stage 2 criteria will be effective is in fiscal year 2014 for eligible hospitals and CAHs or calendar year 2014 for EPs. The table below illustrates the progression of meaningful use stages from when a Medicare provider begins participation in the program.

1st Year

Stage of Meaningful Use

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2011

1

1

1

2

2

3

3

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

2012

1

1

2

2

3

3

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

2013

1

1

2

2

3

3

TBD

TBD

TBD

2014

1

1

2

2

3

3

TBD

TBD

2015

1

1

2

2

3

3

TBD

2016

1

1

2

2

3

3

2017

1

1

2

2

3

Note that providers who were early demonstrators of meaningful use in 2011 will meet three consecutive years of meaningful use under the Stage 1 criteria before advancing to the Stage 2 criteria in 2014. All other providers would meet two years of meaningful use under the Stage 1 criteria before advancing to the Stage 2 criteria in their third year.

In the first year of participation, providers must demonstrate meaningful use for a 90-day EHR reporting period; in subsequent years, providers will demonstrate meaningful use for a full year EHR reporting period (an entire fiscal year for hospitals or an entire calendar year for EPs) except in 2014, which is described below. Providers who participate in the Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs are not required to demonstrate meaningful use in consecutive years as described by the table above, but their progression through the stages of meaningful use would follow the same overall structure of two years meeting the criteria of each stage, with the first year of meaningful use participation consisting of a 90-day EHR reporting period.

For 2014 only, all providers regardless of their stage of meaningful use are only required to demonstrate meaningful use for a 3-month EHR reporting period. For Medicare providers, this 3-month reporting period is fixed to the quarter of either the fiscal (for eligible hospitals and CAHs) or calendar (for EPs) year in order to align with existing CMS quality measurement programs, such as the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR). The 3-month reporting period is not fixed for Medicaid EPs and hospitals that are only eligible to receive Medicaid EHR incentives, where providers do not have the same alignment needs. CMS is permitting this one-time 3-month reporting period in 2014 only so that all providers who must upgrade to 2014 Certified EHR Technology will have adequate time to implement their new Certified EHR systems.

Core and Menu Objectives
Stage 2 uses a core and menu structure for objectives that providers must to achieve in order to demonstrate meaningful use. Core objectives are objectives that all providers must meet. There is also a predetermined number of menu objectives that providers must select from a list and meet in order to demonstrate meaningful use.
To demonstrate meaningful use under Stage 2 criteria—

  • EPs must meet 17 core objectives and 3 menu objectives that they select from a total list of 6, or a total of 20 core objectives.
  • Eligible hospitals and CAHs must meet 16 core objectives and 3 menu objectives that they select from a total list of 6, or a total of 19 core objectives.

Download the Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet for a complete list of the Stage 2 core and menu objectives for both EPs and eligible hospitals and CAHs. Providers can also download a table of the Stage 2 core and menu objectives and measures by clicking on the links below:

  • Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Core and Menu Objectives for EPs
  • Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Core and Menu Objectives for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs

Clinical Quality Measures for 2014 and Beyond
All providers are required to report on CQMs in order to demonstrate meaningful use. Beginning in 2014, all providers regardless of their stage of meaningful use will report on CQMs in the same way.

  • EPs must report on 9 out of 64 total CQMs.
  • Eligible hospitals and CAHs must report on 16 out of 29 total CQMs.

In addition, all providers must select CQMs from at least 3 of the 6 key health care policy domains recommended by the Department of Health and Human Sevices’ National Quality Strategy:

  • Patient and Family Engagement
  • Patient Safety
  • Care Coordination
  • Population and Public Health
  • Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources
  • Clinical Processes/Effectiveness

A complete list of 2014 CQMs and their associated National Quality Strategy domains will be posted on the Clinical Quality Measures tab in the future. CMS will also post a recommended core set of CQMs for EPs that focus on high-priority clinical conditions.
For more detailed information on 2014 CQMs and electronic reporting options, click to download our 2014 Clinical Quality Measures Tipsheet.

ONC and CMS @HIMSS12 Annual Conference & Exhibition — Las Vegas

Federals at HIMSS12 Annual Conference & Exhibition
February 20-24, 2012 · Las Vegas, NV
Accessed and excerpted from HealthIT.gov on Feb 18, 2012

Representatives from ONC, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR), and other Federal agencies will be at HIMSS to share information about their health IT initiatives. Below are highlights from the HIMSS schedule of events. For a complete list of participating Federal agencies and their educational sessions, visit the Federal section of the HIMSS12 website.

HIMSS Schedule of Events

Time Location Event
Monday, February 20, 2012
8:45-9:30 a.m. Lando 4204 HIE Symposium – Opening Keynote HIE: The Next Generation and Beyond
Doug Fridsma, Director, Office of Standards and Interoperability
9:30-10:30 a.m. Lando 4204 HIE Symposium – Inter Agency Collaboration: A Federal Update
John Allison, Health Insurance Specialist
Claudia Williams, Director, State HIE Program
10:45-11:45 a.m. Lando 4204 HIE Symposium – State Collaborations: Current Trends and Future Directions
Lee Stevens, Program Manager, State HIE Program
11 a.m.-12 p.m. San Paolo 3504 Physicians’ IT Symposium – Optimizing Your EHR Value Through Patient Engagement
Judy Murphy, RN, Deputy National Coordinator
12:45-1:45 p.m. Lando 4204 HIE Symposium – SLHIE: Moving from Planning to Implementation
Jessica Kahn, Technical Director for Health IT
Claudia Williams, Director, State HIE Program
1-2 p.m. Veronese 2506 Achieving Meaningful Use Symposium – CMS and ONC Present Stage 2 Essential Knowledge
Robert Anthony, Policy Analyst, CMS
Steven Posnack, Director, Federal Policy Division, ONC
1:30-2:30 p.m. Veronese 2406 Performance Measurement and CDS Symposium: Leveraging CDS at the Point of Care to Optimize Quality Measure Outcomes
Jacob Reider, MD, ONC Senior Policy Advisor
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
9:45-10:45 a.m. Casanova 503 Health IT Update from HRSA
Yael Harris, PhD, MHS, Director, Office of Health IT & Quality
9:45-10:45 a.m. Lando 4303 Stage 2 Meaningful Use
Elizabeth Holland, Director, HIT Initiatives Group
Jessica Kahn, Technical Director for Health IT
9:45-10:45 a.m. Galileo 1001 Direct Project Panel Discussion
Moderator: Doug Fridsma, Director, Office of Standards and Interoperability
9:45-10:45 a.m. TBD HIE National Landscape, Monitoring States Momentum
Moderator: Lee Stevens, Program Manager, State HIE Program
11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Casanova 503 CDC and Meaningful Use: Strengthening the Link Between Healthcare Providers and Public Health
Seth Foldy, MD, MPH, FAAFP, Senior Advisor, Public Health Surveillance & Informatics Program Office
11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Lando 4303 ONC Consumer Outreach/Pledge Initiative
Lygeia Ricciardi, Senior Policy Advisor for Consumer e-Health
11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. San Polo 3503 Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs: Meaningful Use Stage 1 Overview
Travis Broome, Policy Analyst
Elizabeth Holland, Director, HIT Initiatives Group
Jessica Kahn, Technical Director for Health IT
Robert Anthony, Policy Analyst
12:15-1:15 p.m. San Polo 3503 Redefining Health Care: Advancing Patient-Centered Care Through Health IT
Carolyn Clancy, MD, Director of AHRQ
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
8:30-9:30 a.m. San Polo 3503 ONC Certification Programs – Update and Next Steps
Doug Fridsma, Director, Office of Standards and Interoperability
Steve Posnack, Director, Federal Policy Division
Carol Bean, Director, Certification Division
9:45-10:45 a.m. San Polo 3503 Stage 2 Meaningful Use: An Introduction
Travis Broome, Policy Analyst, CMS
Elizabeth Holland, Director, HIT Initiatives Group, CMS
Steve Posnack, Director, Federal Policy Division, ONC
Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
1-2 p.m. Casanova 503 Update on HIPAA Initiatives
David Sayen, Regional Administrator, CMS
Elizabeth Reed, Health Insurance Specialist, CMS
2:15-3:45 p.m. San Polo 3503 ONC Townhall: Advancing Health IT Into the Future
Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
Thursday, February 23, 2012
8:30-9:30 a.m. Palazzo Ballroom Keynote speaker
Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
9:45-10:45 a.m. San Polo 3503 Privacy and Security – You Can Do It and Here’s How
Joy Pritts, Chief Privacy Officer, ONC
9:45-10:45 a.m. Venetian Showroom Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs: Stage 2 NPRM Overview
Travis Broome, Policy Analyst, CMS
Elizabeth Holland, Director, HIT Initiatives Group, CMS
Jessica Kahn, Technical Director for Health IT, CMS
Robert Anthony, Policy Analyst, CMS
1-2 p.m. TBD RECs: Accelerating Meaningful Use
Kimberly Lynch, Director of the REC Program
1-2 p.m. Lido 3106 Stage 2: Exchange of Information and Public Health Objectives
Jessica Kahn, Technical Director for Health IT, CMS
Robert Anthony, Policy Analyst, CMS
Steven Posnack, Director, Federal Policy Division, ONC
1-2 p.m. Murano 3306 Consumer E-Technology in Action: Four Implementation Examples from Beacon Communities
Korey Capozza, Utah Beacon
Drew McNicol, Western New York Beacon
Alan Snell, MD, Indiana Beacon
Barbara Sorondo, Maine Beacon
2:15-3:15 p.m. Marco Polo 705 IOM Study-Patient Safety
Jacob Reider, MD, ONC Senior Policy Advisor
2:15-4:15 p.m. San Polo 3503 Stage 2: Clinical Quality Measures
Travis Broome, Policy Analyst, CMS
Steve Posnack, Director, Federal Policy Division, ONC
Friday, February 24, 2012
10:00-11:00 a.m. San Polo 3503 HIPAA Privacy and Security Regulations
Leon Rodriguez, Director of OCR
11:15 a.m.-12:15 p.m. Venetian Showroom Stage 2: Payment Adjustments and Changes from Stage 1
Travis Broome, Policy Analyst, CMS
Robert Anthony, Policy Analyst, CMS
Theater Booth Sessions – Exhibit Hall, Booths 14624/14824

CMS and ONC will be presenting on special topics in health IT and meaningful use at the theater booth in the HIMSS exhibit hall.

Time Presentation Topic
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
1:30-2:15 p.m. Workforce: The Use of Immersive Learning Environments in Online HIT Technology
3:00-3:30 p.m. Medicaid Patient Volume
4:00-5:45 p.m. Beacon Communities: Bringing HITECH to Life – Beacon Project Highlights – IT-Enabled Care Coordination, HIT Infrastructure to Support Pioneer ACOs, and Mobile Technology in Support of Better Diabetes Management
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
9:45-10:30 a.m. Query Health: Demonstrating How to Send Questions to the Data
11:00-11:30 a.m. Overview and Timeline for Incentives and Payment Adjustments
12:00-12:45 p.m. NwHN Exchange Opportunities and the Path Forward
2:45-3:30 p.m. AHRQ: Model Children’s EHR Format
4:00-4:30 p.m. FAQs on Stage 1 Meaningful Use
5:00-5:45 p.m. The popHealth Challenge Demonstration: Patient Engagement Reminders for popHealth Measures
Thursday, February 23, 2012
10:00-10:30 a.m. How States Are Auditing the Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
11:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Overview of Stage 2 Meaningful Use
3:00-3:45 p.m. Privacy & Security: Privacy Protection for Substance Abuse Treatment Information
4:00-4:45 p.m. Workforce: Using the ONC-HIT Teaching Materials
ONC “Talk to the Expert” Sessions – Exhibit Booth #14824

ONC will be hosting “Talk to the Expert” sessions at its exhibit booth. Stop by to learn about:

  • ONC resources
  • Certification and Standards/Interoperability
  • ONC’s Regional Extension Centers, Beacon, and Workforce programs.
Engage with ONC during the Conference Online

During HIMSS, ONC will be engaging people online through its social media properties by:

  • Hosting discussions on LinkedIn
  • Tweeting live from the event
  • Loading all of their handouts from the conference on Scribd

If you are not already a member of our LinkedIn group, or following us on Twitter (@ONC_HealthIT), sign up today to join the discussion!

Don’t forget to check out Scribd to download handouts from HIMSS!

For More Information

ONC Appoints Muntz and Murphy in Reorg

Experienced Health IT Execs Appointed to Lead in 2012
National Coordinator for Health IT Farzad Mostishari, MD, ScM,  appointed David Muntz, MBA, to the new position of Principal Deputy National Coordinator in the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT in January 2012, while Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN, was appointed Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy in late 2011. Both the positions and appointees have been posted recently on the ONC’s Web site.

David Muntz, MBA, FCHIME, CHCIO
Principal Deputy National Coordinator

David Muntz, FCHIME, CHCIO

David Muntz, FCHIME, CHCIO

Muntz was  Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for the Baylor Health Care System in Dallas and a 38-year veteran of medical information systems. According to the ONC Description of Organizational Structure and Offices, the “Principal Deputy National Coordinator works with and reports directly to the National Coordinator and is responsible for day-to-day operations, decision making, and staff management of ONC. The Principal Deputy will oversee the activities of four offices within ONC: Office of the Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy; Office of the Deputy National Coordinator for Operations; Office of Economic Analysis, Evaluation and Modeling; and, Office of the Chief Scientist. One of the current ONC offices, the Office of the Chief Privacy Officer, is a position mandated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and will continue to report to the National Coordinator.”

According to a press release issued in conjunction with 2010 National Health IT Week,  “David Muntz, a 37-year veteran of Medical Information Systems, is Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for the Baylor Health Care System in Dallas. As CIO, Mr. Muntz is responsible for more than 650 employees who care for a delivery system with more than 140 points of entry. Mr. Muntz works closely with hospitals, leadership, boards, physicians, nurses and clinicians system-wide toward improving information technology at Baylor. Since he joined Baylor in 2006, the hospital has received notoriety in healthcare IT, most notably as the #1 innovator in the healthcare sector on the 2007 Information Week 500 list.

“Mr. Muntz is a Fellow of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) and currently serves on the CHIME Board of Trustees, Advocacy Leadership Team, and Policy Steering Committee. Also an active member of the Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), he has been a speaker for  numerous local, state, and national organizations. He was recognized as CIO Innovator of the Year by CHIME in 2005 and was listed as one of the “Top 5 CIOs” in the June 1999 issue of Health Management.

“Prior to Baylor, Mr. Muntz most recently served as the Senior Vice President and CIO at Texas HealthResources, where he was responsible for all information system functions including Medical Records. While working for Texas Health Resources, Muntz’s information services organization received national recognition nine years in a row. Mr. Muntz also had a distinguished career with the Wadley Research Institute and Blood Bank, starting as a biostatistician and eventually becoming CEO of the Institute. During his tenure with Wadley, Mr. Muntz led the team that created a complete online record for the community’s blood bank. In addition, Wadley’s other divisions, the hospital, clinic,
and physician practices, shared a computer based patient record created by Mr. Muntz and his staff.

“Mr. Muntz holds an MBA from Southern Methodist University in Dallas and an AB degree in Premedicine and English from Columbia College in New York City.”

Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN
Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy

Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN

Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN

According to the ONC Web site,Judy Murphy is Deputy National Coordinator for Programs & Policy at the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, Department of Health and Human Services in Washington D.C.  She is a nurse, who came to the ONC in December of 2011 with more than 25 years of health informatics experience at Aurora Health Care in Wisconsin, an integrated delivery network with 15 hospitals, 120 ambulatory centers, home health agencies and over 30,000 employees.  She led the EHR program since 1995, when Aurora was one of the early adopters of health IT.  Most recently she was Vice President-EHR Applications, and managed the organization’s successful achievement of Stage 1 EHR Meaningful, with incentive payments beginning in September 2011.

“Her informatics interests lie in system implementation methodologies, health IT project management, automated clinical documentation, and the use of technology to support evidence-based practice; she has published and lectured nationally and internationally on these topics.  She has a long-standing reputation of patient advocacy and maintaining a “patient-centric” point of view, and approaches her work with unyielding energy as well as dedication, passion, and commitment to the healthcare transformation enabled by technology.

“Judy has been on the Health IT Standards Committee since its inception in May 2009.  On that committee, she co-chaired the Implementation Workgroup, and was a member of the Meaningful Use Workgroup.  She has also served on the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Board of Directors and the Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Board of Directors.  She is a Fellow in the American Academy of Nursing, the American College of Medical Informatics and HIMSS.  She received the 2006 HIMSS Nursing Informatics Leadership Award, was named one of the “20 People Who Make Healthcare Better” in 2007 by HealthLeaders magazine, and was selected as one of 33 Nursing Informatics’ Pioneers to participate in the Nursing Informatics History Project sponsored by AMIA, NLM, AAN, and RWJF.”

ONC Organization Chart
ONC Posts New Organizational Chart Dated Nov 16, 2011.

Description of Organizational Structure and Offices

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is directed by the National Coordinator and is assisted by the Chief Privacy Officer, Health Care Reform Coordinator, and Principal Deputy National Coordinator as well as the Deputy National Coordinator for Operations, Deputy National Coordinator for Programs & Policy, Chief Scientist, and the Office of Economic Analysis, Evaluation and Modeling.

The Office of the Chief Privacy Officer, a position mandated by the Recovery Act, advises on privacy, security, and data stewardship of electronic health information and coordinate ONC’s privacy and related efforts with similar privacy officers in other Federal agencies, State and regional agencies, and foreign countries.

Health Care Reform Coordinator is the principal advisor to the National Coordinator for all Health Reform issues. The coordinator ensures the programs to accelerate adoption of interoperable health IT lay the necessary foundation for health care reform including new payment policy that achieves better care, better health, and lower costs.

Principal Deputy National Coordinator works with and reports directly to the National Coordinator and is responsible for day-to-day operations, decision making, and staff management of ONC. The Principal Deputy will oversee the activities of four offices within ONC: Office of the Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy; Office of the Deputy National Coordinator for Operations; Office of Economic Analysis, Evaluation and Modeling; and, Office of the Chief Scientist. One of the current ONC offices, the Office of the Chief Privacy Officer, is a position mandated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and will continue to report to the National Coordinator.

The Office of Economic Analysis and Modeling provides analyses to the National Coordinator, including advanced modeling of the U.S. health care system for simulating the micro- and macroeconomic effects of investing in health IT.

The Office of the Chief Scientist is responsible for research and for identifying innovations in information technology that can be applied in health care settings, and which will be the ONC interface for international activities.

The Office of the Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy assumes functions previously performed by the Office of Health Information Technology Adoption, the Office of Interoperability and Standards, the Office of Adoption Provider Support, the Office of State and Community Programs, and the Office of Policy and Planning. The new office will lead ONC programs related to health information exchange, regional extension centers, training of the health IT workforce, and the development of technical standards for interoperability, security, and certification of health IT systems. The new office comprises:

  • The Office of Standards and Interoperability, with responsibility for standards, security, certification, the Nationwide Health Information Network, Federal Health Architecture and the CONNECT program;
  • The Office of Provider Adoption Support, which administers the Regional Extension Centers program and health IT workforce development;
  • The Office of State and Community Programs, which administers the state-level health information exchange program and the Beacon Communities Program; and
  • The Office of Policy and Planning, which is realigned to include all policy development, including privacy and security policy, and is liaison with legal affairs and legislative affairs, regulations development and externally focused strategic planning.

Deputy National Coordinator for Operations is responsible for activities that are vital to supporting ONC’s numerous programs and enhancing ONC’s ability to communication about health IT. This office comprises:

  • The Office of Communications, which is responsible for stakeholder communications and constituency relations; and
  • The Office of Mission Support, which supports day-to-day operations, including new grants processing, contracts management, budget execution and reporting, human resources, as well as internal strategic planning, special projects, and budget formulation; and
  • The Office of Oversight, which assures oversight of grants, internal and external performance reporting, and auditing; and
  • The Office of Grants Management, which is responsible for carrying out full lifecycle grants management functions and providing procedural and technical business support to ONC grant award recipients and program managers. The office is charged with awarding and managing ONC’s portfolio of grant programs. Through the execution of the grants lifecycle, the office ensures that federal grant funds are properly awarded and are managed effectively to ensure good stewardship of taxpayer dollars.

DIRECTORY as of 1/9/2012
Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM

National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

Office of the Chief Privacy Officer
Joy Pritts, JD
Principal Deputy National Coordinator
David Muntz, MBA
Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy
Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN

Deputy National Coordinator for Operations
Elisabeth A. Handley, MPA
  • Office of Oversight: Maruta Budetti
  • Office of Communications: Peter Garrett
  • Office of Grants Management: Lisa Lewis
  • Office of Mission Support: Sam Shellenberger
Office of the Chief Scientist
Doug Fridsma, M.D., Ph.D. (Acting)
Office of Economic Analysis and Modeling
Mike Furukawa, Ph.D. (Acting)
Health Care Reform Coordinator
Kelly Cronin

ONC’s Wil Yu: ‘Proof of Concept Testing through Innovation Exchanges for Health IT’

Quick Note: This is one of many blog posts that I will be writing in September that highlights how innovation leadership within the health IT and health care communities is changing the health IT landscape. I’ll cover efforts being championed within the White House, ONC/HHS, and the broader environment, that are helping to usher in a wave of new technologies and services that will lead to better health care, health, and cost savings through continuous quality improvement.

Proof of Concept Testing – Connecting Early Stage Innovators to Stakeholders

One of the more exciting initiatives taking place is a unique effort to unite early stage innovators with the broader ecosystem to shepherd and nurture new technological development.

One of the greatest challenges facing any health care innovator is to develop ideas with the broader environment – working with a myriad of stakeholders in an appropriate manner to obtain the crucial data needed to validate the effectiveness, value, and strategy tied to the innovation. I’m referring to getting to the critical stage known as the proof-of-concept.

New White House Startup America Initiative

Realizing that getting to this stage requires substantial time and resources, I’m pleased to report that the White House Startup America Initiative, in partnership with HHS, is promoting an effort called Innovation Exchanges for Health IT – a model that promotes facilitated forums that assemble a collection of early stage, near-proof-of-concept innovators with forward looking health care organizations.  The explicit goal of this program is to identify opportunities for testbeds to support innovative development.  This is a first-of-a-kind initiative that helps to cross stakeholder lines in the interest of innovation.

The benefits of these proof-of-concept exchanges are apparent:

  • Health care organizations that participate can identify potential future developers that they wish to collaborate with from a host of candidates in a single day, substantially lowering their search costs.
  • Innovators can find potential partners by presenting to a dozen organizations at once – saving precious time and accelerating their development timelines.

While not meant to be a commercial opportunity, participants are free to identify scope and duration of their collaborations.

More Innovation Events Scheduled

The first Innovation Exchange for Health IT took place in Philadelphia earlier this year, under the leadership of BluePrint Health IT.   We’ll see at least three more events taking place in Indianapolis (October), San Francisco (September), and in the New England area (October) sponsored by a variety of organizations.

As I’ve noted before, community building is an essential step in the innovation process.  These exchanges are an attempt to provide the opportunity to forge the relationships needed to sustain those communities.

Feel free to contact me if you would like to participate in a future exchange.

Wil Yu, Special Assistant, Innovations (wil.yu@hhs.gov)

###
To comment directly on the ONC Health IT Buzz Blog, click here.

Note: The first Innovation Exchange for Health IT took place on May 26, 2011 in Philadelphia as the BluePrint Health IT Innovation Summit.

This blog is produced by Mike Squires, Executive Director, BluePrint Health IT Innovation Exchange Summit, and Vice President, Strategic Development and Public Policy for BluePrint Healthcare IT.

You can learn more about participating in the Mid-West Summit in Indianapolis on October 12 or the West Coast Summit on December 8, 2011, where 10 hospitals and 10 health IT Innovators will be matched, by visiting www.blueprinthit.com/summit or contacting me directly at mike.squires@blueprinthit.com