Category Archives: States

Community Colleges Participating in Consortia to Educate Health IT Professionals

Posted on by
Reply
State-sorted List of the 85 ONC-funded Community College Consortia
to Educate Health IT Professionals
Go to Office of National Coordinator’s Web site to sort columns by heading.
Excerpted on June 18, 2010 

Community Colleges Participating in the Program
School City State
National Park CC – AR Hot Springs AR
Pima College Tucson AZ
Maricopa College Phoenix AZ
Los Rios Community College District Sacramento CA
Cosumnes River College Sacramento CA
Butte College Oroville CA
Mission College Santa Clara CA
Fresno City College Fresno CA
Santa Barbara City College Santa Barbara CA
Cypress College Cypress CA
East LA College Monterey Park CA
Santa Monica College Santa Monica CA
Orange Coast College Costa Mesa CA
San Diego Mesa College San Diego CA
Pueblo CC Pueblo CO
Capital Community College Hartford CT
Community College of DC Washington DC
Broward College – FL Coconut Creek FL
Indian River State College – FL Ft. Pierce FL
Santa Fe College – FL Gainesville FL
Atlanta Technical College Atlanta GA
U of Hawaii CC-Kapiolani Honolulu HI
Des Moines Area Community College Ankeny IA
Kirkwood Community College Cedar Rapids IA
North Idaho College Coeur d’Alene ID
Moraine Valley Community College Palos Hills IL
Johnson County Community College Overland Park KS
Kentucky Comm and Tech Coll System Versailles KY
Delgado CC – LA New Orleans LA
Bristol Community College Fall River MA
Community College of Baltimore County Baltimore City MD
Ocean County College Toms River MD
Kennebec Valley Community College Fairfield ME
Southern Maine Community College South Portland ME
Delta College University Center MI
Lansing Community College Lansing MI
Macomb Community College Warren MI
Wayne County Community College Detroit MI
Normandale Community College Bloomington MN
St. Louis Community College St. Louis MO
Hinds CC – MS Raymond MS
Itawamba CC – MS Tupelo MS
Montant Tech Butte MT
 Pitt Community College Winterville NC
Catawba Valley CC – NC Hickory NC
Central Piedmont CC – NC Charlotte NC
Pitt CC – NC Winterville NC
Lake Region College Devil’s Lake ND
Metropolitan Community College Omaha NE
Community College sytem of New Hamphsire Concord NH
Brookdale Community College Lincroft NJ
Burlington County College Pemberton NJ
Camden County College Blackwood NJ
Essex County College Newark NJ
Gloucester County College Sewall NJ
Passaic County Community College Paterson NJ
Raritan Valley Community College Branchburg NJ
San Juan College – NM Farrington NM
College of Southern Nev Las Vegas NV
 Bronx Community College Bronx NY
Suffolk County Community College Brentwood NY
 Westchester Community College Valhalla NY
Cuyahoga Community College Cleveland OH
Cincinnati State Technical & Community College Cincinnati OH
Columbus State Community College Columbus OH
Sinclair Community College Dayton OH
Tulsa CC – OK Tulsa OK
Community College of Allegheny County Pittsburgh PA
Florence/Darlington – SC Florence SC
Dakota State College Madison SD
Chattanooga State CC – TN Chaaannooga TN
Dyersburg State CC – TN Dyersburg TN
Walters State CC – TN Morristown TN
Dallas County Comm Coll District – TX Dallas TX
Houston CC – TX Houston TX
Midland College – TX Midland TX
Salt Lake CC Salt Lake City UT
Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach VA
Northern Virginia Community College Annadale VA
Community College of Vermont Waterbury VT
Bellevue College Bellevue WA
Portland C C Portland WA
Madison Area Technical College Madison WI
Milwaukee Area Technical College Milwaukee WI
West Virginia Northern Community College Wheeling WV
 

June 16 Webinar on HIE Multi-Party Legal Agreements/DURSA

Posted on by
Reply

Multi-Party Legal Agreements for Health Information Exchange
Produced by National eHealth Collaborative
June 16, 2010       2:30 – 4:00 pm ET
Excerpted from National eHealth Collaborative site on June 16, 2010 
“NeHC is offering a Special National Health IT Week Stakeholder Forum on Multi-Party Legal Agreements for Health Information Exchange as an opportunity for all stakeholders, especially state decision makers, to understand how multi-party legal agreements can be effective for data-sharing at the state level.

Trust Framework

Trust Framework

 

“This session is intended to provide decision makers and others with a foundational legal concept for understanding potential applications of multi-party data-sharing agreements. The Data Use and Reciprocal Services Agreement (DURSA) used by the NHIN Exchange will be presented as a case study in the development of multi-party agreements and participants will learn about those aspects of the DURSA that may be applicable to state level agreements.

“Experts from the ONC Office of Policy and Planning and the ONC Office of State and Community Programs, as well as the State-Level HIE Project led by the AHIMA Foundation (technical assistance provider to state HIE grantees), will be on hand to answer questions from stakeholders and participate in the discussion.

“LEARNING OBJECTIVES: By participating in this Stakeholder Forum, participants will:

    Learn about the pros and cons of multi-party legal data-sharing agreements for health information exchange

  • Learn about aspects of the DURSA that may impact HIE development for states
  • Take away information that will inform state-level plans to consider participation in interstate HIE or the NHIN Exchange”

To register, please go to NeHC site.

Calling all HIEs–Nat’l, Reg’l, State, Community–eHi 2010 Survey Deadline Jun 24

Posted on by
Reply

June 24 Deadline for eHealth Initiative 2010 Annual Survey on Health Information Exchange
2010 Annual Survey Results Posted
eHealth Initiative survey deadlines June 24, 2010 and  is “designed to capture health information exchange activities across the country and the results will be used to identify trends, inform policy, and support the forward movement of HIE.” Results will be released at eHealth Initiative’s National Forum on Health Information Exchange on July 22, 2010 in Washington, DC.

Per eHi Web site: “Any groups engaged in health information exchange are invited to participate.”

Here’s eHI’s detailed listing of groups who should complete the survey.
“You should complete this survey,
– if your organization is planning for health information exchange at the national, regional, state, or community level; OR
– building or maintaining a technical infrastructure to support health information exchange; OR
– federally funded as a state designated entity; OR
– facilitating the exchange of data between at least two different stakeholders, such as a hospital and physician practice; OR —not directly involved in building a technical infrastructure, but coordinating or creating policy to facilitate health information exchange.”

SURVEY COMPLETED
See eHI Survey site for complete information.
Click here to complete the survey

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ehi2010hiesurvey

Results of 2009 eHi Survey

Thirty-two State Health Information Exchange Plans For ONC: New York Added to Directory

Posted on by
2

HIE Plans from Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin
Updated November 21, 2010. New York submitted its operational plan to ONC on October 26, 2010. Indiana and Kansas State HIE Strategic and Operational Plans were submitted to ONC on August 31, 2010.  Listed below are thirty-two State HIE Strategic and Operational Plans developed for submission to Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT. List includes New Mexico, Maryland, Maine, and Utah Strategic and Operational Plans that have already been approved by ONC. Reportedly two additional unnamed state plans have been approved by ONC but not yet officially announced. Some versions of the plans below are drafts, have not yet have been submitted to ONC, and may be under state review prior to submission. Some of the dates by each listing below and on the linked documents may refer to a date of expected submission to ONC and not to the date of the actual version. All the documents were compiled from publicly available Web sites. For a previous post on approved plans, see e-Healthcare Marketing. 

Please send links to additional published State HIE Strategic and Operational Plans to e-Healthcare Marketing for posting, using either the comments box or emailing to e-Healthcare Marketing producer listed in About me section.

Links to PDFs of State HIE Strategic and/or Operational Plans with Dates
Alabama Strategic Plan 5/7/2010
Arkansas Strategic Plan Draft 7/30/2010
California Strategic and Operational Plan 4/6/2010
          CA eHealth Operational Plan
          CA eHealth Strategic Plan
          Appendices 1-8
          Appendices 9-15
          Appendices 16-19
          Appendix 20
          Appendices 21-22

Connecticut Strategic Plan 6/10/2010
Florida Executive Summary Only (2 pages) 5/23/21010
Illinois Strategic Plan  (7/30/2010)
Illinois Strategic Plan Appendix (7/30/2010)
Indiana Strategic and Operational Plan 8/31/2010
Iowa Strategic and Operational Plan 5/2010
Kansas Strategic and Operational Plan 8/31/2010
Louisiana Strategic and Operational Plan 8/2010
Maine Strategic and Operational Plan 6/18/2010 Approved by ONC
Maine HIE Project Plan 2010-2014 3/29/2010
Maryland Strategic and Operational Plan 6/9/2010 Approved by ONC
Massachusetts Strategic Plan 4/15/2010 (unclear if this is ONC-submission)
Massachusetts Strategic and Operational Plan (8/30/2010) Subnitted to ONC.
Michigan Strategic Plan 4/30/2010
Michigan Operational Plan 4/30/2010
Minnesota Strategic Plan 5/17/2010
Minnesota Operational Plan 5/21/2010
Missouri Strategic Plan 3/17/2010
Missouri Operational Plan 6/8/2010
Nebraska Strategic Plan 4/20/2010
Nebraska Operational Plan 4/20/2010
New Hampshire Strategic and Operational Plan (Draft) 8/6/2010
New Jersey Operational Plan 8/13/2010
New Mexico Strategic and Operational Plan 3/24/2010 Approved by ONC
New York Operational Plan 10/26/2010 Submitted to ONC
North Carolina Strategic Plan  Updated and resubmitted to ONC 10/25/2010
North Carolina Operational Plan Submitted to ONC  8/31/2010; Revised 10/25/2010 re: structured lab results.
Oregon Strategic Plan Submitted to ONC 8/23/2010
Oregon Operational Plan Submitted to ONC 8/23/2010
Pennsylvania Strategic Plan 3/2010
Rhode Island Strategic Plan Executive Summary 5/28/2010
South Carolina Strategic Plan 4/20/2010
South Carolina Operational Plan 7/29/2010
Tennessee Strategic Plan 6/7/2010
Tennessee Operational Plan 6/7/2010
Texas Strategic and Operational Plans (Staff Draft) 8/25/2010
Utah Strategic Plan  3/2010 Approved by ONC
Utah Operational Plan 3/2010 Approved by ONC
Virginia Strategic Plan 7/30/2010
Washington State Strategic and Operational Plan 7/6/2010
Wisconsin Strategic and Operational Plan 7/16/2010
Wisconsin Strategic and Operational Plan Appendices 7/16/2010

ONC Shares Approved HIE Plans for Maryland, Utah, and New Mexico

Posted on by
Reply

State HIE Toolkit Posts Approved HIE Plans for Maryland, Utah, and New Mexico
On June 10, 2010 the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT posted the approved Strategic and Operational Plan for the Maryland Health Information Exchange (HIE) on the  State HIE Toolkit.  Maryland’s plan was added to ONC-approved plans already posted for Utah and New Mexico.

Maryland Strategic And Operational Plan (pdf)

Utah Strategic Plan (pdf)
Utah Operational Plan (pdf)
New Mexico Operational Plan (pdf)

iHealthBeat.org compiled a roundup of articles about the three state programs on June 11, 2010.

Jennifer Lubell, HITS staff writer for ModernHealthcare.com reported on the Maryland and New Mexico plans on June 11, 2010. 

Evaluation of State HIE Coop Programs: Leadership Webinar

Posted on by
Reply

Webinar (Slides) with State HIE Participants May 20, 2010:
Evaluation of State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreements Program
NORC (National Opinion Research Center) at the University of Chicago made a presentation to State HIE Leaders on May 20, 2010 on the evaluation project that Office of National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT has hired them to perform. NORC will seek best practices and evaluate progress of state programs against those best practices and goals of the State HIE Cooperative Agreement Program.

Excerpted from State HIE Leadership Forum
Slide set PDF

Webinar with State HIE Participants
May 20, 2010

Agenda
• Introduce the evaluation team
• Provide an overview of the evaluation approach
• Discuss the evaluation technical assistance that the evaluation team will provide
• Provide an overview of the work that is being done to identify measure to track progress towards state goals

NORC Key Staff
• Prashila Dullabh (Project Director)
• Alana Knudson (Co-Project Director)
Other listed as well as sub-contractors

Overview of the Evaluation
• ONC awarded NORC contract in March 2010 to:
          Evaluation of the State Health Information Exchange (HIE)
          Cooperative Agreement Program focusing on systematic and timely feedback
          Identify best practices that successful states are taking to enable or facilitate exchange
         Analyze issues and challenges
         Assess the effectiveness of the Program in furthering information exchange capability within states

• Convene a Technical Advisory Group (TAG)
• Provide evaluation-related Technical Assistance (TA)

Research Domains
 The evaluation team will explore the following key research questions:
1. What are the various approaches that states are taking to enable or facilitate health information exchange?
2. What progress have states made in supporting health information exchange?
3. How does the approach relate to the level of implementation progress?

Evaluation Activities
• Review of state plans
• Conduct initial case studies
• Conduct structured interviews
• Review and analysis of data from states
• Collect additional data

Case Studies
• Objective: Identify lessons learned and strategies for overcoming barriers to HIE
• After reviewing the state plans, the evaluation team will propose a selection of possible candidates for the TAG’s review and approval.
• Selection criteria include:
          Stage of development
          Best practices for rapid implementation
         Overall model, scope and level of stakeholder participation
         Innovative or different technical approach
         Services provided
         Geographic diversity/Approaches to interstate exchange
• A case study report of key findings will be produced and shared with the program managers

Case Studies Approach
• Case studies to involve:
         Site visits
         Analysis of background materials and developing profiles of selected states
         One-on-one discussions with HIE leadership and stakeholders
         Focus group discussions with users and non-users

Evaluation Technical Assistance
• The evaluation team will provide technical assistance to the
states in their evaluation efforts by:
          Conducting webinars and teleconferences related to specific components of evaluation
          Holding evaluation seminars/workshops for state evaluation personnel to share ideas and listen to best practices
         Collating available tools and resources on evaluation
• What other approaches to technical assistance would be helpful?

Background on Performance Measures
• Reporting on performance measures is a program requirement and stipulated as part of the funding received by all states
• Purpose is to provide assessments on the overall progress and success of the Cooperative Agreement Program
• Focus is to develop measures that allow ONC to gain a deeper understanding of the current level of exchange within each state program and monitor changes over time
• Evaluation team to collaborate with ONC to develop baseline performance measures that relate to the development of HIE and compliments the overall evaluation

Selection and Design
Factors considered:
• Relevance of the measure across or within each of the phases of HIE maturity
• Relevance of the measures to the proposed meaningful use criteria
• Availability of data sources which could populate each measure
• Feasibility of states to get access to data sources

Approach
• Assist ONC in the development of a draft set of process-based and outcome-based measures
• Refine the draft set of measures with input from states and ONC
What are optimum approaches to involve the states in the development of the measures?

CMS Awards Add’l $9.1 Mil for Medicaid Health IT to New Jersey, Louisiana, Maryland, and Minnesota

Posted on by
Reply
Four New CMS Awards for Health IT Programs for Medicaid
Ups  Total to $67.6 Mil for 41 State/Territory Medicaid Agencies
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) announced its four latest federal matching fund awards on May 11, 2010 as part of the CMS Electronic Health Records Incentive Program with $9.2 million in this round divided between the Medicaid agencies for New Jersey with $4.93 million, Louisiana with $1.85 million, Maryland with $1.37 million, and Minnesota with $1.04 million.

Among the 41 State/Territory Medicaid agencies, New Jersey captured the second largest award, with New York maintaining its top spot at $5.91 million. The midpoint for award amounts remains about $1.4 million per agency. See complete chart below with states, amounts, and dates announced.

The press release for each state award continues to say “The Recovery Act provides a 90 percent federal match for state planning activities to administer the incentive payments to Medicaid providers, to ensure their proper payments through audits and to participate in statewide efforts to promote interoperability and meaningful use of EHR technology statewide and, eventually, across the nation.”

All award announcements  (May 11, 2010 and prior) can be viewed via a search of CMS press releases that this link launches. 

CMS Matching Funds for EHRs  

State Amount Date
Alabama $269,000 2/26/2010
Alaska $900,000 1/21/2010
Arizona $2,890,000 2/26/2010
Arkansas $815,000 2/26/2010
California $2,480,000 12/9/2009
Colorado $798,000 3/24/2010
Florida $1,690,000 2/26/2010
Georgia $3,170,000 12/9/2009
Idaho $142,000 12/9/2009
Illinois $2,180,000 2/26/2010
Iowa $1,160,000 11/23/2009
Kansas $1,700,000 2/26/2010
Kentucky $2,600,000 1/21/2010
Louisiana $1,850,000 5/11/2010
Maine $1,400,000 2/26/2010
Maryland $1,370,000 5/11/2010
Michigan $1,520,000 2/26/2010
Minnesota $1,040,000 5/11/2010
Mississippi $1,470,000 3/24/2010
Missouri $1,530,000 4/26/2010
Montana $239,000 12/9/2009
Nebraska $894,000 2/26/2010
Nevada $1,050,000 3/24/2010
New Jersey $4,930,000 5/11/2010
New Mexico $405,000 4/26/2010
New York $5,910,000 12/9/2009
North Carolina $2,290,000 3/24/2010
Oklahoma $587,000 2/26/2010
Oregon $3,530,000 4/26/2010
Pennsylvania $1,420,000 1/4/2010
Puerto Rico $1,800,000 4/26/2010
South Carolina $1,480,000 1/21/2010
Tennessee $2,700,000 1/4/2010
Texas $3,860,000 12/9/2009
US Virgin Islands $232,000 12/9/2009
Utah $396,000 3/24/2010
Vermont $294,000 2/26/2010
Virginia $1,660,000 2/26/2010
Washington $967,000 4/26/2010
Wisconsin $1,370,000 1/21/2010
Wyoming $596,000 3/24/2010
TOTAL $67,584,000  

For additional background information on CMS Awards, see these previous posts on e-Healthcare Marketing.
–March 29, 2010: “CMS Awards Total of $50 Million to 32 State Medicaid EHR Programs”
–April 26, 2010: “CMS Awards Add’l $8.2 mil for Medicaid Health IT to Oregon, Puerto Rico, New Mexico, Washington, and Missouri”

CMS Webinar Series on Health IT Starts May 13, 2010

Posted on by
Reply

CMS Webinar Series on Health IT Starts May 2010
Follow up to Feb 2010 CMS Conference on Health IT
Excerpted from CMS Webinar Series site on May 5, 2010. Updated May 22, 2010.

Webinar Series Starting May 13, 2010
CMS Webinar Series“CMS is pleased to announce that a series of Webinars is being conducted for individuals who were unable to participate in ”CMS Second Annual Multi-State Health IT Collaborative for E-Health Conference” that ran February 2010 in Washington, DC.

Five sessions will be offered over the next several weeks, with two already scheduled for time and date.

Session Title and Session Date/Time
Promoting Electronic Records Adoption/ Communications/ Outreach
5/13/2010 1:00 pm ET     Register–click here.

Establishing Health Information Exchange Governance and HIT Exchange Planning
Week of May 18 specific date/time TBD

Lessons Learned and Best Practices for Medicaid Health Information Technology Promotion
5/27/2010 1:00 pm ET    Register, click here.

Health Information Exchange and Tribal Affairs
6/2/2010 1:00 pm ET      Register, click here.

Technical Assistance Resources for State Agencies
6/9/2010 2:00 pm ET      Register, click here.

Promoting Electronic Records
Adoption Communications/Outreach
TBD

You may register for as many Webinars as you like, and registration is free; however, you must be registered to attend.

Please note: A dry run will take place 24 hours prior to each Webinar session to ensure that you are able to participate through the computer system you will be using.

After you have registered, additional information on how to access both the dry run and the Webinar session will be emailed to you approximately 1 week prior to the session date.

For Additional Questions or Support, go to the CMS Webinar page for instructions.

“CMS Second Annual Multi-State Health IT Collaborative for E-Health Conference”
For e-Healthcare Marketing post about “CMS Second Annual Multi-State Health IT Collaborative for E-Health Conference” that ran in February in Washington, DC.

For direct link to materials and presentations from “CMS Second Annual Multi-State Health IT Collaborative for E-Health Conference.”

Boston Health IT/HIE Conferences meets goals center stage and off stage

Posted on by
Reply

Blumenthal, governor put health IT center stage in Boston;
Off stage state HIE, Medicaid and other officials network
Guided by the deft hand of Massacussetts Secretary of Health and Human  Services JudyAnn Bigby through a series

Blumenthal: Live, Projected, Streaming

Blumenthal: Live, Projected, Streaming

 of scheduling shifts, the Boston-based national conference on Health IT with 600 participants from 30 states on April 29-30, 2010, included inspirational keynotes from National Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal and Surgeon General Regina Benjamin, as well as an enthusiastic welcome from host Governor Deval Patrick who moderated a panel as well.

Off stage state HIE and Medicaid directors and leaders took the opportunity to network and compare notes, as well as take advantage of the smaller workshops where session leaders focused on encouraging discussion and bringing up issues that needed to be addressed in the accelerating Health IT federal-state initiative.

Bernie Monegain reported for Healthcare IT on April 30, 2010, “The government will announce ‘soon – it should be very, very soon’ which 15 communities of the 130 that applied will be awarded Beacon Community grants, National Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal, MD, said.” In addition to supporting improved electronic health record implementation and information exchange in communities that have already demonstrated great strengths in those capabilities, these Beacon communities will share lessons learned and best practices in achieving measurable outcomes in  health care quality, safety, efficiency, and population health with communities across the country, according to the Office of the National Coordinator site. 

CMIO.net story by  Jeff Byers  on April 29, 2010 was headlined “CMIO Blumenthal gets personal, calls for teamwork among health IT pros.” Seeing younger colleagues using electronic health records, Blumenthal noted, per Byers reporting, “I was not going to be the only one in my physician group of ten not using it.”  Blumenthal’s message is increasingly appealing to physicians’ sense of professionalism and focus on delivering the best patient care.

Byers futher reported April 29, 2010 in CMIO.net on a discussion of the role of consumers and patients in Health IT by a  ”Panel: How do HIEs, EMRs affect patient-physician experience?,” and provides the viewpoint of each of the panelists. 

ComputerWorld’s article by Lucas Mearian on April 30, 2010 reported “Health IT funding to create 50,000 jobs; Sixty regional IT help centers will help health care facilities implement electronic medical records.”

In addition to regional collaboration meetings among state officials grouped according to CMS regions, Workshops included “Achieving Sustainable Success,” Making a Difference–Health IT and Clinical Quality Improvement,” “State Initiatives in Healthcare Reform,” “Successful HIEs–How They Did It and How Ii Helps,” “Jobs, Jobs, Jobs–Health IT and State Economic Development Policy,” Creating Effective Public/Private Partnerships,” “EHR Early Adopters–How They Did It and How It Helps,” and “Health IT, HIE, and Public Health.”

One key panel, providing a sweeping overview of Health IT policies and standards, was moderated by Internet publisher pioneer Tim O’Reilly of O”Reilly Communications.

State HIE Directors are reportedly meeting with the ONC next week, and this conference acted as a bit of a warmup, with relatively new officials getting to connect, and others catch up.

See previous post on conference on e-Healthcare Marketing.

NOTE: As Jackie Slivko pointed out on LinkedIn on May 3, 2010, “Local and regional healthcare leaders as well as key vendors were also present and had an unprecedented opportunity to connect, learn from each other and network. Kudos to Mass Health Data Consortium http://www.mahealthdata.org/ , and the eHealth Initiative at the Mass Technology Collaborative http://www.maehi.org/ , both of whom continue to provide related forums and seminars. For live video and more from the conference, see http://mahit.us/ .”

State Health Information Exchange Web Sites Compiled

Posted on by
Reply

State HIE Web Sites Compiled
This list of State HIE Web sites is a work in progress
compiled in honor of the National Health IT Conference
hosted by Massacussetts Governor Deval L. Patrick and
all its participants. In some cases, the Web site listed
may be for the state entity that received the award from
the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, and
not the HIE body itself. Please let me know of any corrections
or updates. — Mike Squires

 

State/Ter    HIE Web Site
AK http://www.ak-ehealth.com/
AL http://tiny.cc/b2gqq
AR http://recovery.arkansas.gov/hie/
AZ http://az.gov/recovery/index.html
CA http://www.ehealth.ca.gov
CO http://www.corhio.org/
CT http://www.ct.gov/dph/cwp/view.asp?a=3755&Q=441982
DC To be added
DE http://www.dhin.org/
FL http://www.fhin.net/FHIN/workgroups/HIECC.shtml
GE http://tiny.cc/0zetj
HI http://www.hawaiihie.org/
ID http://www.idahohde.org/about.html
IL http://www.hie.illinois.gov/
IN http://www.ihie.org/
IA http://www.idph.state.ia.us/ehealth/default.asp
KS http://www.kanhit.org/
KY http://ehealth.ky.gov
LA http://www.lhcqf.org/
MA http://www.maehi.org/
MD http://mhcc.maryland.gov/
ME http://www.hinfonet.org/
MI http://www.michigan.gov/mihin
MN http://www.health.state.mn.us/
MO http://www.dss.mo.gov/mhd/cs/index.htm
MT http://www.healthsharemontana.org
NC http://www.nchica.org
ND http://www.nd.gov/itd/
NE http://www.nehii.org/
NH http://www.dhhs.state.nh.us/DHHS/DHHS_SITE/hie.htm
NJ http://www.nj.gov/health/bc/hitc.shtml
NM http://www.nmhic.org/
NV http://www.nehii.org/
NY http://www.nyehealth.org/
OH http://www.ohiponline.org/
OK http://okhca.org/okhitech
OR http://www.oregon.gov/OHPPR/
PA http://www.gohcr.state.pa.us/
RI http://www.riqi.org
SC http://www.schiex.org
SD http://doh.sd.gov/
TN http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/ehealth/
TX http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us
UT http://www.uhin.org/
VA http://www.hits.virginia.gov
VT http://www.vitl.net/
WA http://www.onehealthport.com/HIE/index.php
WI http://dhs.wi.gov/
WV http://www.wvhin.org/
WY http://www.wyhio.org/