Meaningful Use — What it really means for you!: Oct 15 NY State HIMSS Fall Event

New York State HIMSS / Mini-HIMSS Fall Event:
Meaningful Use – What it really means for you!
Friday, October 15, 2010 
8:00am – 6:00pm
Location: New York’s Hotel Pennsylvania
(401 7th Ave. & 33rd St. – Midtown Manhattan)
http://himssnys.org/

Registration Information

Conference Agenda Now Available (PDF)!

With federal Meaningful Use compliance dates looming, provider and healthcare organization leaders must navigate the complex regulatory landscape to fully recognize stimulus incentives. Join colleagues and peers as Healthcare IT leaders from across the state participate in discussions on Meaningful Use requirements and implications as well as related state HIT strategies and initiatives.

Keynote speakers include:

  • David Whitlinger, Executive Director of New York eHeatlh Collaborative
  • Rachel Block, Deputy Commissioner, Office of HIT Transformation, NYS Department of Health
  • Dr. Amanda Parsons, Assistant Commissioner of the Primary Care Information Project, NYC Health Department
  • Dr. Holly Miller, CMIO MedAllies & HIMSS national Board of Directors Vice-Chair Elect
  • Dr. Steven Arnold, CMO of the Virginia Premier Health Plan & HIMSS national Board of Director

CIO panel discussion moderated by past HIMSS national Chair George “Buddy” Hickman, featuring:

  • Paul Conocenti, Senior Vice President, Vice Dean, and CIO, NYU Medical Center
  • Robert Diamond, Vice President and CIO, HealthQuest
  • Jerry Powell, CIO, University of Rochester/Strong Memorial Hospital
Click here to view the CIO panel biographies.

Physician panel discussion moderated by past HIMSS New York State Chapter Chair Dr. Ken Ong, featuring:

  • Alison Connelly, Clinical Systems Administrator and Physician Assistant at Urban Health Plan, Bronx, New York
  • Dr. Olive Osborne, ophthalmology physician, Bronx, New York
  • Dr. Urmilla Shivram, pulmonology and internal medicine physician, Oakland Gardens, New York

Raffles will be held throughout the day and conference to be followed by Vendor Exhibition and Cocktail Reception.

The CPHIMS certification exam will also be offered at the conference (Click here to register for CPHIMS exam).

To register for this important event, please click on the following link: Registration Information

New Health IT Fact Sheet on State & Regional Demonstration Projects Now Available: AHRQ

New Health IT Fact Sheet on State & Regional Demonstration Projects Now Available
Received notice shown immediately below via email on October 8, 2010.
A new AHRQ factsheet is now available. The factsheet, “Health Information Technology: State and Regional Demonstration Projects,” highlights the work of six states in improving health information exchange at a state or regional level. The new factsheet is available online, select to access.

Health Information Technology: State and Regional Demonstration Projects
Fact Sheet

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) awarded projects for supporting statewide data sharing and interoperability activities on a State or regional level aimed at improving the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for patients and populations.Select to download print version (PDF File, 265 KB). PDF Help.
 
Contents

Introduction
In 2004, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) awarded five “State and Regional Demonstrations (SRDs) in Health Information Technology” contracts to organizations in Colorado, Indiana, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Utah. A sixth contract, awarded to Delaware, was added in 2005. The 5-year, $5 million projects were aimed at developing data sharing at the regional or State level, with the overarching goal of improving the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for patients and populations.

Although the six SRDs each completed a common set of deliverables, over the course of the contracts, they also developed a variety of approaches with different technical, business, and governance models. The results of the SRDs’ work have informed the types of organizations that may serve as data sharing partners, the policies that pertain to this work, and the sustainability plans for health information exchange (HIE) in their States. The SRDs are involved with some aspect of the statewide HIE, Regional Extension Center, and/or Beacon Community cooperative agreements, which are supported by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, as funded under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. An overview of each project and its key achievements is provided here.

State and Regional HIE Projects

Colorado Regional Health Information Organization (CORHIO). CORHIO began as a nonprofit organization aimed at building a prototype federated data exchange among its four initial partners: Denver Health, Kaiser Permanente of Colorado, The Children’s Hospital, and University of Colorado Hospital. CORHIO and its partners went live with a 1-year data exchange demonstration on December 1, 2008. The system offered the authorized emergency department (ED) practitioners at three sites and call center employees at one site access to the most common radiology reports, laboratory results, prescribed and dispensed medication information, registration information, electrocardiogram images and/or reports, and problem lists aggregated from all sites. CORHIO’s achievements include the development of a useful enterprise Master Patient Index (MPI) and a robust set of policies that can be applied to future HIE efforts. Following the conclusion of its SRD contract, CORHIO has contracted with a new vendor and will be implementing a clinical messaging service. CORHIO is also developing a multiyear plan to bring services to multiple communities across the State.

Delaware Health Information Network (DHIN). DHIN was created by an act of the Delaware General Assembly, which was signed into law in 1997 to advance the creation of a statewide health information and electronic data interchange network for public and private use. In 2007, DHIN became the first operational statewide clinical HIE. Four of Delaware’s hospital systems currently provide data through the DHIN (a fifth will be added in fall 2010), along with LabCorp, Quest Diagnostics, and Doctors Pathology Services, a local pathology laboratory. Taken together, DHIN’s data senders provide more than 85 percent of laboratory tests and 81 percent of hospital admissions performed in the State of Delaware. Since going live, DHIN has worked to add value for Delaware’s health care community by providing new data types (e.g., transcribed reports) and new functions (e.g., medication history). As of July 2010, DHIN’s users include 65 percent of the State’s health care providers working at more than 230 practices around the State. DHIN is currently transitioning to a new nonprofit, public/private governance structure that will support ongoing operations and the expansion of services.

Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC). The INPC was created by Regenstrief Institute in 1994, with the goal of providing clinical information at the point of care for treating patients in the ED. For the SRD project, Regenstrief Institute expanded its activities by bringing on new data sharing partners, provided additional interfaces for laboratory and pathology data, and expanded its activities outside Indianapolis to other surrounding geographic areas. They are also seeking to resolve issues related to scalability and data normalization, given the huge volume of data and number of transactions (INPC processes an average of 2.5 million Health Level 7 messages per week). INPC captures data from a wide range of sources, including over 50 hospitals, physician practices, public health departments, laboratories, radiology centers, pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers (via SureScripts®), payers, convenience clinics (e.g., those attached to a pharmacy), and long-term care facilities. As of July 2010, the INPC included more than 3 billion coded results, 526 million encounters, and over 53 million text reports. As part of its evaluation, Regenstrief Institute is measuring the value of aggregated clinical data delivered by the INPC for quality improvement. The expected outcome is improved provider compliance with selected clinical quality measures.

Rhode Island: currentcare. The Rhode Island Department of Health (HEALTH) applied for and received the SRD contract from AHRQ on behalf of stakeholders across the State. Development of the statewide exchange, known as currentcare, has been a collaborative effort between HEALTH and the Rhode Island Quality Institute (RIQI). Project governance has been led by RIQI, which became the State-designated health information organization in 2008 and which received contractual and operational responsibility for currentcare in July 2010. The project’s goals are to design, develop, test, deploy, and evaluate an initial health information network to support the secure and reliable exchange of health information, beginning with laboratory results and medication history information. The system is envisioned to link longitudinal patient-level information from source data systems using an MPI, provide a Web-accessible viewer to authorized users in any setting, and interface with electronic health record systems. One of this project’s most important achievements is the development of a broad set of governance, management, and operating policies for currentcare. These policies are integral to ensuring compliance with the RI HIE Act of 2008, which stipulates privacy and confidentiality protections for currentcare that are stricter than some State and Federal health information privacy laws. The project’s evaluation will focus on the development of those policies.

Tennessee: MidSouth eHealth Alliance. The MidSouth eHealth Alliance was formed as a policy-setting body to govern the HIE in Memphis, TN, sponsored by the State of Tennessee and managed in its first 4 years under a sole subcontract to Vanderbilt University. During the initial years, all technical and administrative functions were provided by Vanderbilt. Complete control of the Exchange has been transferred from Vanderbilt and the State to the MidSouth eHealth Alliance. Data services have migrated from Vanderbilt Medical Center to an independent corporation—Informatics Corporation of America. The Exchange began serving clinicians in May 2006 and, as of March 2010, data from 14 hospitals (inpatient and outpatient), 14 primary care safety-net clinics, and the University of Tennessee Medical Group were available to several hundred clinicians working in 14 EDs, 14 primary care clinics, and in hospitals. The overall data are composed of admission, discharge, and transfer data (patient registration data), encounter codes, and clinical data. The latter include laboratory results, diagnostic imaging reports, cardiac study reports, discharge summaries, dictated ED notes, operative notes, history and physical exams, diagnostic codes, patient demographics and other identification, and encounter data. Clinical data, particularly hospital discharge summaries, are most widely used. In the EDs, data are accessed on approximately 7 percent of ED visits.

Utah Health Information Network (UHIN). UHIN is a nonprofit whose partners include physicians, hospitals, laboratories, payers, local health departments, and health centers. UHIN’s project initially involved enhancing the existing gateway for administrative exchange to build clinical information exchange. Ultimately, UHIN and its stakeholders decided to purchase a clinical platform to facilitate clinical exchange, which they call the Clinical Health Information Exchange (cHIE). The cHIE has a modest electronic medical record (EMR), commonly referred to as “EMR lite,” if needed by the clinician (most clinicians in Utah have an EMR); an MPI; results delivery; e-prescribing; and virtual health records query functionality. UHIN is enrolling key data sources and building support among health care providers for participation in the cHIE. As of June 2010, laboratory data is being supplied by two data sources and seven clinics are connected to the cHIE. UHIN has developed a patient consent policy for use with the cHIE. As part of its evaluation, UHIN is analyzing providers’ workflow before and after they implement use of the cHIE at their sites.

For More Information

For additional information on AHRQ projects on health information technology, please visit http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt or contact staff at the AHRQ National Resource Center (NRC) for Health IT at NRC-HealthIT@ahrq.hhs.gov.

Return to Contents

AHRQ Publication No. 10-P011
Replaces AHRQ Pub. No. 07-P005
Current as of August 2010


Internet Citation:

Health Information Technology: State and Regional Demonstration Projects. Fact Sheet. AHRQ Publication No. 10-P011, August 2010. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/hitdemoproj.htm



ONC Certified Health IT List (CHPL) of EHRs–Alpha Ordered

ONC Certified HIT List (CHPL) Published at Last
NOTE: The EHR and EHR module list below has been reordered alphabetically according to vendor name by e-Healthcare Marketing and taken from the ONC list officially dated October 5, 2010. ONC’s official list can be found at http://onc-chpl.force.com/ehrcert

The Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT at last published its official list of tested and certified EHRs and EHR modules on October 8, 2010. Possible delays of only a few days between CCHIT sending ONC its list of tested and certified products and having the list validated by ONC, and ONC’s using a new platform from its HITRC (Health IT Research Center) and Partners, led to those in Health IT being baffled for a few days as to the status of the official list of ONC-ATCB’s (Authorized Testing and Certification bodies) certified, approved and ONC-validated EHRs. The waiting of those watching too closely is over.

Excerpted from ONC on October 8, 2010:
The ONC Certified HIT Product List (CHPL) provides a comprehensive listing of Complete EHRs and EHR Modules that have been tested and certified under the Temporary Certification Program.

Each Complete EHR and EHR Module listed below has been tested and certified by an ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ATCB). The ONC-ATCB has reported certain required information about the Complete EHR or EHR Module to ONC and we have validated these reports. Certified EHR technologies are identified with the name of the certifying ATCB, the ONC certification number, vendor information, product information, and product version number.

Please note: The CHPL lists only those EHR technologies that have been tested, certified, and reported to ONC by an ONC-ATCB, with reports validated by ONC. Only those EHR technologies appearing on the ONC-Certified Health IT Product List may be granted the reporting number that will be accepted by CMS for purposes of attestation under the EHR (“meaningful use”) incentives programs.

Using the CHPL

The Products Overview table references two types of EHR product certification classifications, one for Complete EHRs and one for EHR Modules.

EHR technology classified as Complete EHRs are certified to meet all applicable certification criteria adopted by the Secretary in the Standards and Certification Criteria Final Rule (45 CFR Part 170 subpart C). In the Standards and Certification Criteria Final Rule, the Accounting for Disclosures certification criterion (§170.302(w)) is optional for EHR technologies and may not appear.

EHR Modules are those EHR technologies that have been tested and certified to at least one of the certification criteria adopted by the Secretary in the Standards and Certification Criteria Final Rule. Due to the regulatory requirement that EHR Modules be tested and certified to the security criteria, as elaborated in the Temporary Certification Program Final Rule, EHR Modules will typically be tested and certified to more than one of the adopted certification criteria.

The CHPL provides a snapshot of the current listing of certified EHR technologies, and is updated as newly certified EHR technologies are reported by ONC-ATCBs to ONC and validated.

To determine which criterion an EHR technology is certified to meet, select “Certification Status” below for a listed product. The link will take you to the Product Certification Matrix indicating which of the Certification Criteria the product has been tested, certified, and reported to meet.

Please note: This is Version 1.0 of the Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL). Version 2.0 is under development and is expected to provide additional information, such as a list of the Clinical Quality Measures to which a given product was tested; and additional functionality, such as different ways to query and sort the data for viewing. The later version will also provide the above-mentioned reporting number that will be accepted by CMS for purposes of attestation under the EHR (“meaningful use”) incentives programs. Please send suggestions and comments regarding the Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL) to ONC.certification@hhs.gov, with “CHPL” in the subject line.

Product Certification Overview — Alpha Ordered by Vendor

Vendor Product Product Class- ification Module Product Version # Certification Status Certifying ATCB ONC Certification #
ABEL Medical Software Inc. ABELMed EHR – EMR / PM Complete EHR N/A 11 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-621996-1
Allscripts Allscripts PeakPractice Modular N/A 5.5 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-216363-1
Allscripts Allscripts Professional EHR Complete EHR N/A 9.2 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-395691-1
Allscripts Allscripts ED Modular N/A 6.3 Servic View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-814405-1
Aprima Medical Software, Inc Aprima Complete EHR N/A 2011 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-607751-1
athenahealth, Inc athenaClinicals Complete EHR N/A 10.1 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-360400-1
Cerner Corporation Cerner Millennium Powerchart, Cerner Millennium FirstNet, Cerner Millennium ProF Modular N/A Version 20 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-657723-1
ChartLogic, Inc. ChartLogic EMR Complete Ambulatory NA 7 View Criteria Drummond Group Inc. 09232010-1945-1
Compulink Advantage/EHR Complete EHR N/A 10 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-380800-1
CureMD Corporation CureMD EHR Complete EHR N/A Version 10 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-789570-1
eClinicalWorks LLC eClinicalWorks Complete EHR N/A 8.0.48 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-955447-1
Epic Systems Corporation EpicCare Ambulatory – Core EMR Complete EHR N/A Spring 200 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-574355-2
Epic Systems Corporation EpicCare Inpatient – Core EMR Complete EHR N/A Spring 200 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-574355-1
GE Healthcare Centricity Advance Complete EHR N/A 10.1 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-470465-1
gloStream, Inc. gloEMR Complete EHR N/A 6 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-501340-1
Health Care Systems, Inc. HCS eMR Modular N/A 4 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-107740-1
ifa united i-tech Inc. ifa EMR Modular Ambulatory 6 View Criteria Drummond Group Inc. 09222010-2627-1
Intivia, Inc. InSync Complete Ambulatory N/A 5.4 View Criteria Drummond Group Inc. 09292010-2301-1
Intuitive Medical Software UroChartEHR Complete EHR N/A 4 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-115970-1
MCS – Medical Communication Systems, Inc. iPatientCare Complete EHR N/A 10.8 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-607019-1
Medical Informatics Engineering WebChart EHR Complete EHR N/A Version 5. View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-844134-1
Meditab Software, Inc. IMS Complete EHR N/A v. 14.0 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-372910-1
NeoDeck Software NeoMed EHR Complete EHR N/A 3 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-879100-1
NexTech Systems Inc. NexTech Practice 2011 Modular N/A 9.7 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-998990-1
nextEMR, LLC nextEMR, LLC Modular N/A 1.5 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-300090-1
NextGen Healthcare NextGen Ambulatory EHR Complete EHR N/A 5.6 SP1 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-345777-1
Nortec Software Inc Nortec EHR Complete EHR N/A 7 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-837410-1
PeriGen PeriBirth Modular N/A 4.3.51 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-586750-1
Prognosis Health Information Systems ChartAccess Complete EHR N/A 4 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-216590-1
Pulse Systems 2011 Pulse Complete EHR Complete EHR N/A 2011 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-946110-1
QRS, Inc. PARADIGM Modular Ambulatory 8.3 View Criteria Drummond Group Inc. 09202010-8775-1
Sammy Systems SammyEHR Modular N/A 5.1.1 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-789800-1
SuccessEHS SuccessEHS Complete EHR N/A 6 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-909422-1
The DocPatientNetwork.com Doctations Complete EHR N/A 2 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-371480-1
T-System Technologies, Ltd. T SystemEV Modular N/A 2.7 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-239140-2
T-System Technologies, Ltd. T SystemEV Modular N/A 2.7 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-239140-1
Universal EMR Solutions Physician’s Solution Modular N/A 5 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-681600-1
Vision Infonet Inc., MDCare EMR Modular N/A 4.2 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-516500-1
WellCentive WellCentive Patient Registry Modular N/A Version 2. View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-946650-1
Wellsoft Corporation Wellsoft EDIS Modular N/A v11 View Criteria CCHIT CC-1112-527400-1

Blumenthal Blogs on Health IT-based Patient Safety and Commissioned IOM report

Returning to the Source to Help Achieve Patient Safety Goals
Thursday, October 7th, 2010 | Posted by: Dr. David Blumenthal originally on ONC’s Health IT Buzz Blog and republished here by e-Healthcare Marketing blog.

Two landmark reports by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) changed Americans’ perception of their health care system and launched today’s drive to improve the quality and safety of medical care in America. The reports were To Err Is Human, published in 1999, and Crossing the Quality Chasm, released in 2001. 

Both these reports highlighted the important potential role that health information technology (HIT) could play in improving health care quality and reducing medical errors. In fact, Recommendation #9 in Crossing the Quality Chasm called for “renewed national commitment to building an information infrastructure” and said: “This commitment should lead to the elimination of most handwritten clinical data by the end of the decade.”

The end of that decade is now just three months away, and not to mince words, we’re behind the ambitious schedule that the IOM report envisioned. Nonetheless, we have at last made the substantial commitment that was called for in the report.  

Last year in the HITECH Act, Congress and the President authorized $27 billion in Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments for providers who adopt and make meaningful use of certified electronic health records (EHRs). At the same time, the Act created $2 billion in new programs to support the transition to HIT-assisted care. And this summer, the regulatory framework was completed for Stage 1 of the Meaningful Use path toward an EHR-based future in health care.

With the engines of change now in place, it is time to bring closer focus to other key issues for achieving the full potential benefits of HIT. One of these is the issue of improving patient safety. 

We know, both in theory and practice, that HIT-assisted care can reduce errors and improve patient safety. In particular:  

  • Reliable access to complete personal health information is the foundation of safe and effective care. EHRs are inherently superior to paper in delivering such access.    
  • Even more uniquely, EHRs can use their computing power to automatically cross-check personal information and other sources. With such backup, clinicians can be automatically alerted when drugs or other treatments may be contraindicated because of allergies, potential drug interactions, or other factors.

At the same time, however, it would be naïve to suppose that HIT-assisted care can deliver its full patient safety benefits in a single stroke – or that HIT will not present its own safety issues. Clinicians need to become familiar with new EHR systems, which will take time. EHR systems themselves need to evolve and improve. We need to ensure that the “decision support” information they provide is accurate and personalized. Their interfaces need to grow in user-friendliness. Even safety alerts need to find the right medium and avoid producing “alert fatigue.”

These challenges can be met – and indeed, the very “fix-ability” of HIT-based care can be one of its primary safety benefits. HIT systems tend to record and expose patient safety problems when they occur, while paper-based care too often hides them. And EHRs are amendable to rapid, systemic correction of problems – while corrections in a non-systemic, paper-based clinic can take years to accomplish, even when they are identified.

How can we maximize patient safety through HIT-based care? What roles and actions by government, the private sector, and health care providers themselves can help achieve the full potential benefits that were sought in those seminal IOM reports?

As we address these questions, there is no better source of guidance than the IOM itself, building on the same expertise and convening power that produced its initial reports 10 years ago. For that reason, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology has contracted with IOM for a follow-up one-year study. In this study, IOM will:  

  • Identify approaches to promote the safety-enhancing features of HIT while protecting patients from any safety problems associated with HIT and preventing HIT-related patient safety problems before they occur;
  • Identify approaches for surveillance and reporting activities to bring about rapid detection and correction of patient safety problems;
  • Address the potential roles of private sector entities such as accrediting and certification bodies as well as patient safety organizations and professional and trade associations; and
  • Examine existing authorities and potential roles for key federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

As this study is carried out, we will move where appropriate to improve surveillance, reporting, product safety, and clinician performance. But at the same time, we will anticipate a “deep dive” in knowledge synthesizing and a new round of productive recommendations from the IOM.

There is every reason to believe that HIT-assisted care will be transformative for American medicine, but no reason to think the change will be easy or instantaneous. We are returning to the IOM as a key partner in helping to refine the course that it first helped to chart a decade ago.
###
To post comments, please go to ONC’s Health IT Buzz blog.

Blumenthal Blogs on Kaiser Permanente Gift of Translator: CMT–Convergent Medical Terminology

The Gift of Innovation from Within
Thursday, October 7th, 2010 | Posted by: Dr. David Blumenthal originally on ONC’s Health IT Buzz blog and republished here by e-Healthcare Marketing. 

The health information technology (health IT) sector received an important gift on Sept. 29.  In fact, we received two important gifts.  Both these gifts came from Kaiser Permanente.  And both stemmed from Kaiser’s long-time investment and innovation in health IT adoption and use.

At a ceremony at HHS headquarters last week, Kaiser donated its Convergent Medical Terminology (CMT) for open availability to any HIT developer.  The technology enables clinicians to use the terms that are familiar to them in diagnosis and treatment.  CMT acts like a simultaneous translator in several directions.  For clinicians, it translates clinical language they use to communicate with colleagues into the technical terms that electronic health records (EHRs) use to communicate with other records.  For patients, it takes those underlying technical terms and makes them understandable to lay persons.  And, it can translate clinicians’ terminology directly into lay language as well.  It also facilitates the usability of EHRs and the sharing of health information among clinicians and patients.

This will spur adoption and meaningful use of EHRs.  CMT also will reduce current duplicative efforts – by many vendors and health care organizations – to develop and link clinician and patient-friendly terminology to underlying standards. Finally, in support of future innovation, it gives smaller EHR vendors and clinician practices that lack the resources to support vocabulary development access to high-quality clinician- and patient-friendly terminology.

CMT is a product of life in the real-world.  Kaiser recognized the barriers new EHRs represented for clinicians.  So it drew from its own substantial pool of talent to work with experts and develop a translation structure for its EHR.  Kaiser identified a high importance of clinician usability for successful EHR integration and invested in a solution.

This is precisely the kind of private sector innovation that holds the key to unlocking the potential of health IT.

As we move forward toward national and international adoption of health IT, we all each learn valuable lessons that can be shared with others.  This includes vendors and hospitals, but it also includes medical practices and care providers large and small.  I hope sharing will become another important “standard” as we innovate.  We’ll compete on costs, efficiency and quality, and usability.  But we can share important lessons as we go forward.

HHS Secretary Sebelius, White House Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, IHTSDO Chair Martin Severs, and I, were all on hand to acknowledge the hand-over of CMT.  We at ONC join them in offering our thanks to Kaiser Permanente – for CMT, and even more, for leadership in exemplifying the spirit of innovation!
###
Please post comments directly on the ONC’s Health IT Buzz blog.

ONC’s Yu Blogs on Innovation Communities in Health Technology

Innovation Communities in Health Technology
Tuesday, October 5th, 2010 | Posted by: Wil Yu, Special Assistant Innovations, ONC Office of the Chief Scientist  on Health IT Buzz Blog and republished here by e-Healthcare Marketing.
As the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) carries out its mission toward a goal of nationwide achievement of meaningful use, I am mindful that we are also working toward a greater vision of improved individual and population health outcomes – a vision of a high performance learning health care system that leverages health information and technology, while protecting privacy and confidentiality, and encourages an infrastructure for robust care delivery and technology innovation.   Over the coming weeks, a number of events are being held in support of health care and technology innovation. These events are just a glimpse of the excitement and passion I am seeing take place across country, as multiple, disparate and powerful forces in the environment converge in support of improving and transforming health care.  

Through my role in leading innovation programs and initiatives at ONC, I’m extremely pleased to see the steady growth of innovation communities – an essential requirement to creating sustained pathways for health technology innovation, especially in emerging fields such as data analytics and remote care management. These communities will hopefully bring together a diverse set of perspectives and backgrounds – beyond solely technologists – to include the full spectrum of stakeholders required for honest and practical discussion on the challenges of developing and adopting health technology. 

In the spirit of community building around health technology innovation, ONC has launched several high-profile programs and initiatives. The Beacon Communities program will help to demonstrate the potential of advanced health IT to help achieve measurable improvement in the quality and efficiency of health services at a population level. SHARP – Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects – is an applied research program focused on achieving breakthrough advances to address well-documented problems that have impeded adoption of health IT. At a department level (HHS) and under the leadership of Todd Park, Chief Technology Officer of HHS, we are taking action to improve health by making available a broad range of data sources under the Community Health Data Initiative (CHDI). These programs, along with a host of other initiatives (clinical decision support, personal health records, mHealth, and other areas) all seek to drive community building and will help to support private sector technology development. 

Sustained health IT innovation will inevitably lead to improved clinical outcomes and system efficiencies. While improving the health of the nation, innovation has the potential to lead to improved quality of life and increased patient engagement in care delivery. It represents the promise of breakthroughs in medical research. Importantly, it has the potential to create new markets, jobs, and entrepreneurial opportunities. I believe that no matter what stakeholder lens you view health innovation through, drawing from a diverse community to calibrate the focus will allow for a clearer vision of the future and pathway to success.

Wil Yu, Special Assistant, Innovations (wil.yu@hhs.gov)
ONC, Office of the Chief Scientist
###
Go to the ONC Health IT Buzz Blog to post comments directly on the original post on ONC site.

Eight State Strategic & Operational Plans Approved by ONC So Far: Tennessee Latest

ONC posts South Carolina, Tennessee Strategic and Operational Plans in October plus Tennessee Gap Analysis
Plans Approved for California, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, South Carolina, Tennessee and Utah
These plans and dates were excerpted on October 5, 2010 from Office of National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT’s “State HIE Toolkit.” These are from section called “Planning Examples & Case Studies.”

“The State HIE Toolkit is a compilation of resources provided under the auspices of the State HIE Program sponsored by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC).”

Examples of ONC approved Strategic and Operational Plans:

  1. New Mexico Strategic and Operational Plan V2 (update posted 5/18/10) 
  2. Utah Strategic and Operational Plan (posted 5/18/10)
  3. Maryland Strategic and Operational Plan (posted 6/10/10)
  4. Tennessee Gap Analysis and Strategic and Operational Plans (posted 10/1/10) New!
  5. South Carolina Strategic and Operational Plans (posted 10/5/10) New!   

    States/SDEs with Approved Strategic and Operational Plans
    Updated 10/5/10

       
State Date Approved Date Posted Documents
California 6/16/2010 Will be posted soon  
Delaware 5/17/2010 Will be posted soon  
Maine 8/16/2010 Will be posted soon  
Maryland 5/14/2010 6/10/2010 S&O Plan
New Mexico 1/25/2010 5/18/2010 S&O Plan V2
South Carolina 8/30/2010 10/5/2010 Strategic Plan
Operational Plan
Tennessee 9/17/2010 10/1/2010 Strategic Plan
Operational Plan
Gap Analysis
Utah 5/12/2010 5/18/2010 S&O Plan

See e-Healthcare Marketing post on 31 State Health Information Exchange Plans, last updated on September 1, 2010.

InfoGard Laboratories: Third ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Body

InfoGard Laboratories Approved to Certify EHR: Third ONC-ATCB
Press Release issued on September 20, 2010, San Luis Obispo, California.
InfoGard Laboratories, the nation’s first accredited IT security testing laboratory, is approved by the Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT as an ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ONC-ATCB) for the certification of Complete EHRs and EHR Modules for both ambulatory and inpatient settings. Eligible professionals and hospitals may collect incentive payments through meaningful use of EHR technology capable of meeting the criteria to support meaningful use under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).

“We are pleased to be among the first IT laboratories to be authorized by ONC to certify EHRs” said Maclynn Brinton, President of InfoGard Laboratories. “Subsequent to accreditation by NIST in 1995 as the nation’s first IT security testing laboratory, InfoGard has developed and participated in numerous government and private sector certification testing programs. We have successfully adapted our processes to support the ONC meaningful use EHR certification requirements for stage one and we will work with both ONC and NIST as requirements are developed for the stage two program. InfoGard will be the source of many healthcare IT compliance services, including HIT certification to current and future regulatory requirements.

Recent polls confirm that preventing healthcare breaches is the number one concern of health IT decision-makers (http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/survey-data-breach-prevention-top-mind-it-decision-makers). In addition, surveys indicate that providers will not fully embrace e-prescriptions until applications can accommodate controlled substances. Both breach safe harbor and e-prescription of controlled substances require the implementation of NIST privacy and security standards. InfoGard is the only ATCB that is also NIST accredited to assist EHR vendors with achieving compliance with these NIST standards. 

About InfoGard Laboratories 
InfoGard has been instrumental in developing a number of government and private sector test and certification programs, including NIST’s Cryptographic Module Validation Program, programs for postage metering systems in five western countries, and two programs for the payment card industry. InfoGard is also an accredited Common Criteria laboratory. This experienced has provided InfoGard the ability to collaborate successfully with many different organizations in the development of testing and certification programs. InfoGard is independent, self-funded, and employee owned. We offer no hardware, software, or system products and we do not provide contract hardware or software design services.     

In the early 1990s, InfoGard’s founders collaborated with NIST on FIPS 140-1 using a worked example to develop testing requirements. Then, when the USPS was experiencing $350 million per year of postal meter fraud, InfoGard developed validation testing requirements for the first cryptographically secure postage meters. In the late 1990s, InfoGard collaborated with Visa to develop and implement the first testing program for PIN Entry Devices (point-of-sale terminals and ATMs). More recently, InfoGard collaborated with the Payment Card Industry Council (a corporation owned by VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover Card, and JCB) to develop and implement a certification process for approving vendors that scan merchant networks for security flaws. 

InfoGard’s consistent success with these programs demonstrates our ability to apply IT security knowledge, project management, and most importantly, collaborative skills. This has enriched our interactions with key constituencies and propagated successful new testing and certification programs.  
#              #                  #

Initial 36 EHRs/EHR Modules Approved Under Temporary Certification Program

ONC Certified Health IT Product List and CCHIT Press Release
Two ambulatory EHR modules and one complete ambulatory EHR were tested and certified by The Drummond Group and were the first officially listed  on Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT’s Web site on the  Certified Health IT Product List on Ocotber 1, 2010.

CCHIT issued a press release on October 1, 2010 announcing testiing and certification of 33 EHR modules and complete systems. CCHIT certified 19 complete EHRs including one for a hospital and the rest for ambulatory clinician practices. Among 14 EHR systems certified by CCHIT as modules,  6 were for hospitals and remainder for ambulatory practices. CCHIT noted that many of the certified modules had been submitted as complete EHRs but had not yet been tested for a small number of tests since the federal agency, NIST, had not finalized some of the testing criteria, such as electronic prescribing.  

InfoGard Laboratories was only authorized by ONC to begin testing on September 24, 2010, while CCHIT and Drummond Group authorization began September 3, 2010. InfoGard is based in San Luis Obisop, CA; while CCHIT is based in Chicago, IL; and Drummond Group, Inc, is based in Austin, TX.

ONC’s Certified Health IT Product List
Accessed and excerpted as of 10/2/2010.
“The Certified HIT Product List (CHPL) provides a comprehensive listing of Complete EHRs and EHR Modules that have been tested and certified under the Temporary Certification Program maintained by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC).

“Each Complete EHR and EHR Module listed below has been certified by an ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ATCB), and reported to ONC, and approved by ONC after review. Certified products are identified with the name of the certifying ATCB, the ONC certification number, vendor information, product information, and product version number. Please note that only those products and versions included on the CHPL are deemed “certified EHR technology” under the ONC Temporary Certification Program. The CHPL provides a snapshot of the current listing of certified EHR products, and is updated as newly certified products are reported to and approved by ONC.”

Using the CHPL
“The Products Overview table references two types of EHR product certification classifications, one for Complete EHRs and one for EHR Modules.

“EHR products classified as Complete EHR are certified to meet all the mandatory certification criteria as identified in the Standards and Certification Criteria Final Rule (45 CFR Part 170 Part III). In the Final Rule, the certification criterion for Accounting for Disclosures (§170.302(w)) is optional for systems or technologies seeking certification and may not appear.

“EHR Modules are those technologies that are certified to at least one of the certification criteria as defined in the Standards and Certification Criteria Final Rule. Due to the regulatory requirement that EHR Module technologies be certified to the security criteria, as elaborated in the Final Rule, EHR Modules will typically be certified to more than one of the regulatory criteria.”

The data in the CHPL Products Overview table is current as of October 01, 2010.

Products Certification Overview 

Certifying ATCB ONC Cert # Vendor Products Products Class Module Product Ver #
Drummond Group Inc.
————–
09202010-8775-1
————–
QRS, Inc.
————–
PARADIGM
————–
Modular
—————
Ambu-
latory
————-
8.3
————
Drummond Group Inc.
————–
09222010-2627-1
————–
ifa united i-tech Inc.
————–
ifa EMR
————–
Modular
————–
Ambu-
latory
———–
6
————–
Drummond Group Inc. 09232010-1945-1 ChartLogic, Inc. ChartLogic EMR Complete Ambu-latory  NA 7

Additional details will be available next week. 

Commission Announces First ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 Certifications
Press Release Issued by CCHIT on October 1, 2010 produced in full below.

33 Electronic Health Record Products Meeting ARRA Requirements Are Available to Providers 
CHICAGO – Oct. 1, 2010 – The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®) announced today that it has tested and certified 33 Electronic Health Record (EHR) products under the Commission’s ONC-ATCB program, which certifies that the EHRs are capable of meeting the 2011/2012 criteria supporting Stage 1 meaningful use as approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Certification is required to qualify eligible providers and hospitals for funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).  The certifications include 19 Complete EHRs, which meet all of the 2011/2012 criteria for either eligible provider or hospital technology, and 14 EHR Modules, which meet one or more – but not all – of the criteria.
CCHIT was among the first organizations to be recognized by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) as an Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ONC-ATCB). ONC-ATCB certification aligns with Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology published in the Federal Register in July 2010 and strictly adheres to the test procedures published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) at the time of testing.  
“We are pleased to have quickly completed the certification process for these EHRs so that companies are now able to offer certified products to providers who wish to purchase and implement EHR technology and achieve meaningful use in time for the 2011-2012 incentives. This is a testament to the Commission’s long history in certifying EHRs and the skills and experience of our trained team who test the products we certify,” said Karen M. Bell, M.D., M.S.S., Chair, CCHIT. “We have ramped up our testing capacity to accommodate the demand for ONC-ATCB certification. Applications and testing dates are available for other EHR developers seeking this certification,” she said.

See the latest list of ONC-ATCB Certified 2011/2012 technology

EHR products that have received the Commission’s ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification are:

Complete EHRs
Company
Product
Version
Domain
ABELMed EHR – EMR / PM
11
Eligible Provider
Allscripts Professional EHR
9.2
Eligible Provider
Aprima
2011
Eligible Provider
athenaClinicals
10.10
Eligible Provider
CureMD EHR
10
Eligible Provider
Doctations
2.0
Eligible Provider
EpicCare Inpatient – Core EMR
Spring 2008
Hospital
EpicCare Ambulatory – Core EMR
Spring 2008
Eligible Provider
Centricity Advance
10.1
Eligible Provider
gloEMR
6.0
Eligible Provider
UroChartEHR
4.0
Eligible Provider
iPatientCare
10.8
Eligible Provider
WebChart EHR
5.1
Eligible Provider
IMS
v. 14.0
Eligible Provider
NeoMed EHR
3.0
Eligible Provider
NextGen Ambulatory EHR
5.6
Eligible Provider
Nortec EHR
7.0
Eligible Provider
2011 Pulse Complete EHR
2011
Eligible Provider
SuccessEHS
6.0
Eligible Provider
 
EHR Modules
Many companies offering ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certified EHR modules applied for certification of their products as certified complete EHRs but testing could not be completed on a small number of criteria (such as electronic prescribing) because planned updates to the test procedures by NIST were not available at the time of testing. These products are certified as EHR Modules in the interim but may return to become certified as complete EHRs in the near future. Providers interested in purchasing these products should follow CCHIT’s regular ONC-ATCB product certification updates available at http://www.cchit.org/ as they occur.  
Company
Product
Version
Domain
Allscripts ED
6.3 Service Release 4
Hospital
Allscripts PeakPractice
5.5
Eligible Provider
eClinicalWorks
8.0.48
Eligible Provider
HCS eMR
4.0
Hospital
NexTech Practice 2011
9.7
Eligible Provider
nextEMR, LLC
1.5.0.0
Eligible Provider
PeriBirth
4.3.50
Hospital
ChartAccess
4
Hospital
SammyEHR
1.1.248
Eligible Provider
T SystemEV
2.7
Hospital
Physician’s Solution
5.0
Eligible Provider
MDCare EMR
4.2
Eligible Provider
WellCentive Registry
Version 2.0
Eligible Provider
Wellsoft EDIS
v11
Hospital
 
The HHS Final Rule, Establishment of the Temporary Certification Program for Health Information Technology, requires EHR developers to provide complete information on the details of their ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification, including company and product name and version, date certified, unique product identification number, the criteria for which they are certified, and the clinical quality measures for which they were tested, and  any additional software a complete EHR or EHR module relied upon to demonstrate its compliance with a certification criteria. This information also will be available at http://www.cchit.org  next week for the products certified by CCHIT.
CCHIT and other ONC-ATCBs are required to provide ONC with a current list of Complete EHRs and  EHR Modules that have been tested and certified. That information will be published on ONC’s Certified HIT Products List (CHPL) Web page when it becomes available. 
Many products tested and certified by CCHIT in the ONC-ATCB program are also CCHIT Certified® in the Commission’s independently developed certification program designed for physician practices and hospitals looking for more robust, integrated EHR products to support the unique needs of their clinicians and patients.  Health IT companies certify their EHRs in both programs to provide greater assurance to their customers. Companies with products applying for the CCHIT Certified program may also apply for the ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 program at no additional cost. Detailed information about products with this dual certification is available at http://www.cchit.org.
About CCHIT
The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®) is an independent, 501(c)3 nonprofit organization with the public mission of accelerating the adoption of robust, interoperable health information technology. The Commission has been certifying electronic health record technology since 2006 and is approved by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as an Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ONC-ATCB).  More information on CCHIT, CCHIT Certified® products and ONC-ATCB certified electronic health record technology is available at http://cchit.org.
 
About ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification
The ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification program tests and certifies that EHR technology is capable of meeting the 2011/2012 criteria approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). The certifications include Complete EHRs, which meet all of the 2011/2012 criteria for either eligible provider or hospital technology and EHR Modules, which meet one or more – but not all – of the criteria. ONC-ATCB certification aligns with Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology published in the Federal Register in July 2010 and strictly adheres to the test procedures published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) at the time of testing.   ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification conferred by the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT®) does not represent an endorsement of the certified EHR technology by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services nor does it guarantee the receipt of incentive payments.
 
“CCHIT®” and “CCHIT Certified®” are registered trademarks of the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology.
#                      #                    #

IOM: Study to Improve Health Care Safety with Health IT

Institute of Medicine will study best policies and practices for improving health care safety with health information technology
HHS Press Release on Wednesday, September 29, 2010                         

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) will conduct a 1-year study aimed at ensuring that health information technology (HIT) will achieve its full potential for improving patient safety in health care.  The study will be carried out under a $989,000 contract announced today by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), which is charged with coordinating federal efforts regarding HIT adoption and meaningful use.

“Since 1999, when the IOM published its ground-breaking study To Err Is Human, the Institute has been a leader in the movement to improve patient safety,” said David Blumenthal, M.D., national coordinator for health information technology.  “This study will draw on IOM’s depth of knowledge in this area to help all of us ensure that HIT reaches the goals we are seeking for patient safety improvement.”

The study will examine a comprehensive range of patient safety-related issues, including prevention of HIT-related errors and rapid reporting of any HIT-related patient safety issues.  It will make recommendations concerning the potential effects of government policies and private sector actions in maximizing patient safety and avoiding medical errors through HIT.  Highlights of the study will include: 

* Summary of existing knowledge of the effects of HIT on patient safety;

* Identifying approaches to promote the safety-enhancing features of HIT while protecting patients from any safety problems associated with HIT;

* Identifying approaches for preventing HIT-related patient safety problems before they occur;

* Identifying approaches for surveillance and reporting activities to bring about rapid detection and correction of patient safety problems;

* Addressing the potential roles of private sector entities such as accrediting and certification bodies as well as patient safety organizations and professional and trade associations; and

* Discussion of existing authorities and potential roles for key federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). 

“The IOM is pleased to have the opportunity to add its expertise and convening power in helping to achieve the goals of improved safety through HIT-assisted care,” said IOM President Harvey Fineberg, M.D. 

Donald Berwick, M.D., CMS administrator and a national leader on patient safety, said, “Improving patient safety in health care depends on thoroughness in planning and execution, to find problems systematically and correct them decisively.  We have high expectations for patient safety improvement through HIT, but achieving those goals will require the same careful and vigorous approach that is needed to improve safety in any enterprise.  The IOM can help us identify a productive path to better patient safety with the help of HIT.” 

Substantial funding under the Health Information Technology Economic and Clinical Health Act, part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, will support the adoption and meaningful use of HIT, especially through incentives for the adoption and meaningful use of certified electronic health records. In July, CMS announced regulations outlining the initial requirements that eligible health care providers must meet to demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology for the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments program, which CMS will administer.  Also in July, ONC announced regulations completing the adoption of an initial set of standards, implementation specifications and certification criteria to enable the testing and certification of EHR technology for meaningful use Stage 1.  Earlier this month, ONC named initial testing and certifying bodies. 

More information about HIT and support for adoption and meaningful use can be found on the web at www.healthit.hhs.gov.